Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs V vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs V vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $146M | $446M | $896.00B | $618.49B | $79.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $137M | $280.33B | $43.03B | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $43M | $57.05B | $22.24B | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 69.7% | 60.0% | 81.3% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 41.4% | 25.9% | 61.1% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 27.1x | 10.5x | 14.4x | 24.5x | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $60M | $0.00 | $942.38B | $25.17B | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $245M | $343.34B | $20.15B | $837M |
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs V vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity Bancshares… (AFBI) | 100 | 270.3 | +170.3% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 166.9 | +66.9% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs V vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 0.06x
- PEG 0.37 vs ICE's 1.95
- PEG 0.37 vs 1.95
- Beta 0.22 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
BSVN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.64, yield 2.1%, current ratio 502.78x
- NIM 4.5% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 2.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BSVN's 169.2%
V is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AFBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AFBI's 0.5%
Among these 5 stocks, ICE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.37 vs 1.95 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AFBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.5% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AFBI's 0.5% |
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs V vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs V vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • AFBI leads 1 • BSVN leads 0 • ICE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5407.2x AFBI's $52M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFBI's 14.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $137M | $280.3B | $43.0B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $58M | $81.4B | $27.6B | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $43M | $57.0B | $22.2B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $36M | $100.9B | $21.2B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +69.7% | +60.0% | +81.3% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +41.4% | +25.9% | +61.1% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +31.4% | +20.4% | +51.7% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +26.4% | +36.0% | +49.2% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.8% | -3.4% | +16.0% | +35.3% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AFBI and BSVN each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 67% valuation discount to V's 31.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AFBI offers better value at 0.37x vs ICE's 2.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $446M | $896.0B | $618.5B | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $165M | $202M | $1.50T | $623.5B | $99.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 10.33x | 16.00x | 31.61x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.46x | 14.40x | 24.51x | 17.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 0.61x | 0.90x | 2.00x | 2.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.37x | 3.48x | 18.36x | 24.73x | 15.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 3.25x | 3.20x | 15.46x | 6.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.77x | 2.47x | 16.72x | 2.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.92x | 10.78x | 8.88x | 28.66x | 18.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $6 for AFBI. AFBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs AFBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +18.2% | +15.9% | +58.9% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +2.3% | +1.3% | +22.7% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +18.3% | +4.5% | +29.2% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +5.2% | +8.9% | +36.2% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | — | 2.60x | 0.66x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$245M | $599.0B | $5.0B | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $245M | $343.3B | $20.2B | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $0 | $942.4B | $25.2B | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 1.39x | 0.74x | 26.72x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,085 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, AFBI leads with a +23.5% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +13.0% | -0.5% | -6.6% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +20.3% | +21.8% | -12.5% | -20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +97.2% | +138.2% | +45.6% | +34.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +189.1% | +118.2% | +42.0% | +30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.7% | +169.2% | +465.8% | +330.2% | +195.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | +25.4% | +33.6% | +13.3% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AFBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AFBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFBI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.64x | 0.94x | 0.54x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.53 | $50.10 | $337.25 | $374.17 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.20 | $37.56 | $262.71 | $293.89 | $136.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +92.8% | +95.1% | +86.2% | +74.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 62.6 | 59.1 | 46.9 | 31.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 11K | 7.0M | 6.4M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BSVN and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSVN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", V as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BSVN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.10% vs V's 0.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | $339.75 | $368.91 | $194.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 61 | 61 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +1.9% | +0.7% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 15 | 18 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 | $5.95 | $2.36 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +3.9% | +2.2% | +1.7% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs V vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 6x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 61x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +30. 9% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus AFBI's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 329% more volatile than AFBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Affinity Bancshares, Inc. (AFBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to -15. 3% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 10. 9% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 14. 0% for AFBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Visa Inc. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE?
In this comparison, BSVN (2.
1% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), ICE (1. 4% yield), V (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. AFBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AFBI or BSVN or JPM or V or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, AFBI: +80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFBI and BSVN and JPM and V and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AFBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BSVN, JPM, V, ICE pay a dividend while AFBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.