Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AFBI vs BSVN vs KO vs PEP vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
AFBI vs BSVN vs KO vs PEP vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $146M | $446M | $355.61B | $197.17B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $137M | $49.28B | $93.92B | $826M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $43M | $13.70B | $8.24B | $254M |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 69.7% | 61.7% | 54.1% | 71.8% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 41.4% | 29.3% | 12.2% | 37.5% |
| Forward P/E | 27.1x | 10.5x | 25.3x | 16.7x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $60M | $0.00 | $45.49B | $49.90B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $245M | $10.27B | $9.16B | $1.08B |
AFBI vs BSVN vs KO vs PEP vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity Bancshares… (AFBI) | 100 | 270.3 | +170.3% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFBI vs BSVN vs KO vs PEP vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 0.06x
- PEG 0.37 vs PEP's 5.11
- PEG 0.37 vs 3.67
- Beta 0.22 vs FFIN's 0.78
BSVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 169.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- Beta 0.64, yield 2.1%, current ratio 502.78x
- NIM 4.5% vs FFIN's 3.3%
- 31.4% margin vs PEP's 8.8%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs AFBI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.0%
PEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 54 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 3.9%
- 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 13.5%
- 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.37 vs 3.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.4% margin vs PEP's 8.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs FFIN's 0.78 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.5% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs AFBI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.0% |
AFBI vs BSVN vs KO vs PEP vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AFBI vs BSVN vs KO vs PEP vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • AFBI leads 1 • PEP leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BSVN and FFIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $93.9B annually — 1811.7x AFBI's $52M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PEP's 8.8%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $137M | $49.3B | $93.9B | $826M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $58M | $15.5B | $14.3B | $320M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $43M | $13.7B | $8.2B | $254M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $36M | $12.6B | $7.7B | $283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +69.7% | +61.7% | +54.1% | +71.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +41.4% | +29.3% | +12.2% | +37.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +31.4% | +27.8% | +8.8% | +30.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +26.4% | +25.5% | +8.2% | +34.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | +5.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.8% | -3.4% | +18.2% | +66.7% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 62% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AFBI offers better value at 0.37x vs PEP's 7.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $446M | $355.6B | $197.2B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $165M | $202M | $390.8B | $237.9B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 10.33x | 27.18x | 24.05x | 19.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.46x | 25.27x | 16.68x | 16.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 0.61x | 2.43x | 7.37x | 4.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.37x | 3.48x | 26.39x | 16.63x | 11.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 3.25x | 7.42x | 2.10x | 5.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.77x | 10.40x | 9.63x | 2.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.92x | 10.78x | 67.15x | 25.70x | 15.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for AFBI. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PEP's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 8/9 vs AFBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +18.2% | +41.1% | +40.1% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +2.3% | +13.1% | +7.7% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +18.3% | +15.8% | +14.9% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +5.2% | +17.3% | +16.1% | +16.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | — | 1.33x | 2.43x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$245M | $35.2B | $40.7B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $245M | $10.3B | $9.2B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $0 | $45.5B | $49.9B | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 1.39x | 10.70x | 10.34x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AFBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, AFBI leads with a +23.5% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFBI at 25.8% vs PEP's -4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +13.0% | +20.3% | +3.5% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +20.3% | +17.2% | +13.4% | -5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +97.2% | +47.0% | -11.7% | +24.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +189.1% | +65.6% | +14.3% | -25.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.7% | +169.2% | +121.1% | +82.3% | +136.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | +25.4% | +13.7% | -4.1% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AFBI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFBI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs PEP's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.64x | -0.20x | -0.11x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.53 | $50.10 | $84.04 | $171.48 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.20 | $37.56 | $65.35 | $127.60 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +92.8% | +98.3% | +84.1% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 62.6 | 60.6 | 41.6 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 11K | 12.7M | 6.0M | 683K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSVN as "Buy", KO as "Buy", PEP as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, PEP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.86% vs BSVN's 2.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | $86.13 | $167.88 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 48 | 45 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +2.5% | +3.9% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 56 | 54 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 | $2.04 | $5.57 | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.2% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
BSVN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
AFBI vs BSVN vs KO vs PEP vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 61x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSVN returned +169. 2% versus AFBI's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 78β — meaning FFIN is approximately -491% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for PepsiCo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 3% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 8. 8% for PepsiCo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 12. 2% for PEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 22. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN?
In this comparison, PEP (3.
9% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield), BSVN (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AFBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AFBI or BSVN or KO or PEP or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, AFBI: +80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFBI and BSVN and KO and PEP and FFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AFBI (Financial Services) and BSVN (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and PEP (Consumer Defensive) and FFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AFBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BSVN, KO, PEP, FFIN pay a dividend while AFBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.