Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AGM vs RITM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
AGM vs RITM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.95B | $5.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.32B | $5.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $681M |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 92.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 45.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $30.82B | $39.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $931M | $1.85B |
AGM vs RITM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Agricultura… (AGM) | 100 | 279.0 | +179.0% |
| Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGM vs RITM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 4.5%
- 409.4% 10Y total return vs RITM's 79.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 0.12x
RITM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth -37.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- Beta 0.86, yield 11.6%, current ratio 1.79x
- 20.0% FFO/revenue growth vs AGM's -18.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% FFO/revenue growth vs AGM's -18.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 9.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs RITM's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs RITM's 0.86 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs RITM's 11.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.8% vs RITM's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs AGM's 0.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 0.6% |
AGM vs RITM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AGM vs RITM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RITM is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 4.2x AGM's $1.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.7% (AGM) to 12.3% (RITM).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $5.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $681M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $222M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +92.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +45.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +52.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -82.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RITM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, RITM trades at a 12% valuation discount to AGM's 10.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RITM's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGM's 124.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.8B | $43.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.76x | 9.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.48x | 4.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 124.53x | 16.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.48x | 0.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.38x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RITM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGM delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for RITM. RITM carries lower financial leverage with a 4.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGM's 17.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGM scores 4/9 vs RITM's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +7.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 17.93x | 4.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.9B | $37.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $931M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30.8B | $39.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.17x | 2.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGM five years ago would be worth $18,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,221 for RITM. Over the past 12 months, AGM leads with a +5.8% total return vs RITM's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RITM at 17.3% vs AGM's 14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.8% | -3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.2% | +61.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.7% | +42.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +409.4% | +79.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.5% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
AGM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGM is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RITM's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AGM currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs RITM's 77.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.64 | $12.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $136.57 | $8.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +77.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 10.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AGM and RITM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AGM as "Buy" and RITM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for RITM (target: $14) vs 30.2% for AGM (target: $233). For income investors, RITM offers the higher dividend yield at 11.58% vs AGM's 4.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $233.00 | $13.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +11.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.11 | $1.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
AGM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RITM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AGM vs RITM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGM or RITM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rithm Capital Corp.
(RITM) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGM or RITM?
On trailing P/E, Rithm Capital Corp.
(RITM) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation at 10. 8x. On forward P/E, Rithm Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 4. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGM or RITM?
Over the past 5 years, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) delivered a total return of +81.
7%, compared to +42. 2% for Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGM returned +409. 4% versus RITM's +79. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGM or RITM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus Rithm Capital Corp. 's 0. 86β — meaning RITM is approximately 13% more volatile than AGM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 18% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGM or RITM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rithm Capital Corp.
(RITM) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -18. 9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation grew EPS 1. 1% year-over-year, compared to -37. 7% for Rithm Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGM or RITM?
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 12. 0% for Rithm Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RITM leads at 44. 6% versus 19. 4% for AGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RITM leads at 90. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGM or RITM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rithm Capital Corp.
(RITM) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 9. 5x for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RITM: 38. 5% to $13. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGM or RITM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) offers the highest yield at 11. 6%, versus 4. 5% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM).
09Is AGM or RITM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76), 4. 5% yield, +409. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGM: +409. 4%, RITM: +79. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGM and RITM?
These companies operate in different sectors (AGM (Financial Services) and RITM (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AGM is a small-cap deep-value stock; RITM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.