Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AGX vs MYRG vs PWR vs MTZ vs PRIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
AGX vs MYRG vs PWR vs MTZ vs PRIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $9.57B | $6.65B | $112.65B | $32.50B | $5.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $915M | $3.82B | $29.99B | $15.28B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $120M | $142M | $1.12B | $459M | $248M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 11.9% | 13.6% | 12.1% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 5.1% | 5.8% | 5.6% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 62.5x | 44.0x | 57.4x | 48.6x | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $104M | $1.19B | $2.80B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $145M | $150M | $440M | $396M | $541M |
AGX vs MYRG vs PWR vs MTZ vs PRIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argan, Inc. (AGX) | 100 | 1865.4 | +1765.4% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1483.4 | +1383.4% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2032.8 | +1932.8% |
| MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) | 100 | 1053.1 | +953.1% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGX vs MYRG vs PWR vs MTZ vs PRIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 52.5%, EPS growth 157.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 1.40, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.63x
- 52.5% revenue growth vs MYRG's 8.8%
MYRG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 0.1%
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs AGX's 19.9%
- Beta 1.30 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage
- 0.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PRIM's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, MTZ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRIM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs MTZ's 16.37
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 48.6x), PEG 0.98 vs 16.37
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 52.5% revenue growth vs MYRG's 8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 48.6x), PEG 0.98 vs 16.37 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.1% margin vs MTZ's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PRIM's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +312.1% vs PRIM's +62.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs MTZ's 4.7%, ROIC 43.2% vs 8.9% |
AGX vs MYRG vs PWR vs MTZ vs PRIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AGX vs MYRG vs PWR vs MTZ vs PRIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGX leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • MYRG leads 0 • MTZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 32.8x AGX's $915M. AGX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTZ's 3.0%. On growth, MTZ holds the edge at +34.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $915M | $3.8B | $30.0B | $15.3B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $123M | $261M | $2.4B | $1.2B | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $120M | $142M | $1.1B | $459M | $248M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $283M | $231M | $1.7B | $179M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +11.9% | +13.6% | +12.1% | +10.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +5.6% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +3.7% | +3.7% | +3.0% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +6.0% | +5.6% | +1.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +20.0% | +26.3% | +34.5% | -5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.5% | +106.2% | +51.0% | +4.9% | -60.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 81% valuation discount to AGX's 112.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs MTZ's 27.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.6B | $6.7B | $112.7B | $32.5B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.4B | $6.6B | $113.4B | $34.9B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 112.20x | 56.76x | 110.40x | 81.32x | 21.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.52x | 44.03x | 57.40x | 48.62x | 18.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.40x | 6.40x | 27.39x | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 100.48x | 28.84x | 45.68x | 32.32x | 13.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.95x | 1.82x | 3.97x | 2.27x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.27x | 10.18x | 12.61x | 9.73x | 3.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.46x | 28.66x | 69.50x | 113.74x | 17.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGX delivers a 28.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $13 for PWR. AGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTZ's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.6% | +22.1% | +13.0% | +14.2% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +8.7% | +4.8% | +4.7% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +43.2% | +18.3% | +11.8% | +8.9% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.0% | +19.4% | +11.3% | +10.2% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.16x | 0.13x | 0.84x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$143M | -$47M | $748M | $2.4B | $735M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $145M | $150M | $440M | $396M | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $104M | $1.2B | $2.8B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.49x | 6.27x | 4.37x | 21.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGX five years ago would be worth $138,514 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33,445 for PRIM. Over the past 12 months, AGX leads with a +312.1% total return vs PRIM's +62.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGX at 158.5% vs MYRG's 47.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +112.0% | +88.5% | +70.8% | +81.1% | -17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +312.1% | +175.2% | +132.1% | +183.8% | +62.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1627.9% | +219.8% | +345.2% | +368.2% | +346.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1285.1% | +417.6% | +651.1% | +270.5% | +234.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1987.2% | +1680.8% | +3143.9% | +1752.9% | +402.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +158.5% | +47.3% | +64.5% | +67.3% | +64.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PWR is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRIM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.70x | 1.30x | 1.64x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $742.30 | $475.39 | $788.72 | $441.43 | $205.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $164.00 | $152.10 | $315.45 | $143.93 | $65.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +89.9% | +95.2% | +93.4% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.8 | 80.7 | 87.0 | 76.5 | 30.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 398K | 306K | 1.1M | 942K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PWR and PRIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGX as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", PWR as "Buy", MTZ as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -39.0% for AGX (target: $421). For income investors, PRIM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs AGX's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $420.67 | $362.00 | $647.23 | $330.25 | $160.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 21 | 35 | 36 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +0.1% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | — | $0.40 | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.2% | +0.1% | +0.2% | +0.2% |
AGX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AGX vs MYRG vs PWR vs MTZ vs PRIM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Argan, Inc.
(AGX) is the stronger pick with 52. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Argan, Inc. (AGX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 21.
5x versus Argan, Inc. at 112. 2x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM?
Over the past 5 years, Argan, Inc.
(AGX) delivered a total return of +1285%, compared to +234. 4% for Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus PRIM's +402. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning PRIM is approximately 41% more volatile than PWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Argan, Inc. (AGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 84% for MasTec, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Argan, Inc.
(AGX) is pulling ahead at 52. 5% versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGX leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM?
Argan, Inc.
(AGX) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 8% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGX leads at 10. 1% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGX leads at 16. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Argan, Inc. — 44. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield), AGX (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MYRG, PWR, MTZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AGX or MYRG or PWR or MTZ or PRIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Argan, Inc.
(AGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1987% 10Y return). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGX: +1987%, PRIM: +402. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGX and MYRG and PWR and MTZ and PRIM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AGX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MTZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.