REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AHH vs ELME vs NXRT vs EQR vs CPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
AHH vs ELME vs NXRT vs EQR vs CPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Office | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $515M | $188M | $756M | $24.68B | $10.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $325M | $0.00 | $252M | $3.12B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-154M | $-32M | $954M | $388M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | — | 91.1% | 46.3% | 61.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | — | 11.5% | 28.5% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 50.6x | 67.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.65B | $520M | $1.56B | $8.78B | $3.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $1.33B | $14M | $56M | $25M |
AHH vs ELME vs NXRT vs EQR vs CPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armada Hoffler Prop… (AHH) | 100 | 74.6 | -25.4% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
| Camden Property Tru… (CPT) | 100 | 113.7 | +13.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AHH vs ELME vs NXRT vs EQR vs CPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AHH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ELME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.47, yield 34.1%, current ratio 1.02x
- 34.1% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1%
- +8.1% vs NXRT's -15.2%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
EQR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 7.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 4.1% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 4.6% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 4.2% vs -15.3%
CPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 66.8% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 87.9%, current ratio 0.10x
- PEG 2.91 vs EQR's 9.94
- 32.8% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.8% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs AHH's 0.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 34.1% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.1% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 4.2% vs -15.3% |
AHH vs ELME vs NXRT vs EQR vs CPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AHH vs ELME vs NXRT vs EQR vs CPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EQR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CPT leads 1 • AHH leads 1 • ELME leads 0 • NXRT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $3.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. CPT is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, EQR holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $325M | $0 | $252M | $3.1B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $172M | -$44M | $125M | $1.9B | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$154M | -$32M | $954M | $388M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $62M | $79M | $1.3B | $714M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | — | +91.1% | +46.3% | +61.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | — | +11.5% | +28.5% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | — | -12.7% | +30.6% | +32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | — | +31.2% | +42.7% | +60.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.4% | -4.0% | +0.5% | +2.5% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | -6.6% | 0.0% | -64.2% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AHH leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, EQR trades at a 23% valuation discount to CPT's 29.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CPT offers better value at 1.26x vs EQR's 4.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $515M | $188M | $756M | $24.7B | $10.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | -$624M | $2.3B | $33.4B | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -49.46x | -1.21x | -23.65x | 22.63x | 29.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 50.61x | 67.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.44x | 1.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.22x | — | 18.60x | 15.61x | 16.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | — | 3.01x | 7.96x | 6.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 0.78x | 2.52x | 2.24x | 2.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.02x | 3.03x | 9.05x | 19.13x | 28.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPT delivers a 8.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. EQR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPT scores 7/9 vs NXRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | -18.9% | -10.1% | +8.4% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | -8.3% | -1.7% | +4.6% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | -15.3% | +1.1% | +4.2% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | -10.1% | +1.5% | +5.7% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.99x | 2.18x | 5.18x | 0.77x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | -$812M | $1.5B | $8.7B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $1.3B | $14M | $56M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $520M | $1.6B | $8.8B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.99x | -3.82x | 0.47x | 5.58x | 3.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EQR five years ago would be worth $10,667 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,343 for AHH. Over the past 12 months, ELME leads with a +8.1% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQR at 5.5% vs AHH's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | -4.2% | +2.6% | +8.4% | -4.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | +8.1% | -15.2% | -2.7% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.3% | +13.3% | -15.5% | +17.5% | +5.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.6% | -15.3% | -23.0% | +6.7% | +0.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | -11.6% | +211.1% | +29.3% | +66.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.3% | +4.2% | -5.5% | +5.5% | +1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EQR and CPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AHH's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQR currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.47x | 0.62x | 0.38x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.71 | $17.68 | $38.30 | $71.80 | $120.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.14 | $1.98 | $23.79 | $57.58 | $96.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +12.0% | +77.8% | +91.7% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 50.6 | 71.0 | 69.8 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 319K | 1.2M | 216K | 2.4M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ELME and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AHH as "Hold", ELME as "Hold", NXRT as "Hold", EQR as "Hold", CPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 796.2% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.11% vs CPT's 4.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.25 | $19.00 | $27.00 | $70.15 | $112.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 8 | 10 | 46 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.5% | +34.1% | +7.1% | +4.1% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 12 | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | $0.72 | $2.11 | $2.69 | $4.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +2.5% |
EQR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CPT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
AHH vs ELME vs NXRT vs EQR vs CPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Equity Residential (EQR) is the stronger pick with 4.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Equity Residential (EQR) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (50. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT?
On trailing P/E, Equity Residential (EQR) is the cheapest at 22.
6x versus Camden Property Trust at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, Equity Residential is actually cheaper at 50. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Camden Property Trust wins at 2. 91x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT?
Over the past 5 years, Equity Residential (EQR) delivered a total return of +6.
7%, compared to -26. 6% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus ELME's -11. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Camden Property Trust (CPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning AHH is approximately 95% more volatile than CPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equity Residential (EQR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Equity Residential (EQR) is pulling ahead at 4.
1% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Camden Property Trust grew EPS 136. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EQR leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT?
Equity Residential (EQR) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQR leads at 36. 3% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Camden Property Trust (CPT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 91x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Equity Residential (EQR) trades at 50. 6x forward P/E versus 67. 9x for Camden Property Trust — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 796. 2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Elme Communities (ELME) offers the highest yield at 34. 1%, versus 4. 1% for Camden Property Trust (CPT).
09Is AHH or ELME or NXRT or EQR or CPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Camden Property Trust (CPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPT: +66. 8%, AHH: +12. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AHH and ELME and NXRT and EQR and CPT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.