Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AIFU vs CLPS vs RCON vs JFIN vs QFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Internet Content & Information
Financial - Credit Services
AIFU vs CLPS vs RCON vs JFIN vs QFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Information Technology Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Internet Content & Information | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $177M | $25M | $17M | $534M | $3.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.20B | $299M | $66M | $6.54B | $17.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $280M | $-4M | $-43M | $1.71B | $6.89B |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 22.8% | 23.0% | 80.9% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | -1.4% | -86.5% | 32.1% | 43.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | — | — | 0.5x | 0.5x |
| Total Debt | $206M | $34M | $34M | $52M | $1.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $192M | $28M | $99M | $541M | $4.45B |
AIFU vs CLPS vs RCON vs JFIN vs QFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU Inc. (AIFU) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 29.6 | -70.4% |
| Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) | 100 | 71.7 | -28.3% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 44.3 | -55.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIFU vs CLPS vs RCON vs JFIN vs QFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIFU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 246.9% 10Y total return vs QFIN's 16.1%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.5x)
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- 15.2% revenue growth vs AIFU's -43.4%
- Beta 0.27 vs QFIN's 1.20
RCON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
JFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth -18.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 48.2%
- 21.6% ROA vs RCON's -8.0%, ROIC 39.9% vs -10.6%
QFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.02 vs JFIN's 0.03
- 36.5% margin vs RCON's -64.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs AIFU's -43.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs RCON's -64.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs QFIN's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JFIN's 16.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.4% vs QFIN's -63.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.6% ROA vs RCON's -8.0%, ROIC 39.9% vs -10.6% |
AIFU vs CLPS vs RCON vs JFIN vs QFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AIFU vs CLPS vs RCON vs JFIN vs QFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
QFIN leads 1 • CLPS leads 1 • AIFU leads 0 • RCON leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 259.0x RCON's $66M. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCON's -64.3%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $299M | $66M | $6.5B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $175M | -$1M | -$54M | $2.1B | $8.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $280M | -$4M | -$43M | $1.7B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | $0 | -$44M | $0 | $10.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.9% | +22.8% | +23.0% | +80.9% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -1.4% | -86.5% | +32.1% | +43.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | -1.3% | -64.3% | +26.2% | +36.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | -2.3% | -65.9% | +11.8% | +53.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | +15.3% | +2.6% | +1.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +75.8% | +35.7% | +44.9% | -9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLPS and QFIN each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, JFIN trades at a 100% valuation discount to AIFU's 353.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.11x vs JFIN's 0.12x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $177M | $25M | $17M | $534M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $179M | $31M | $7M | $462M | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 353.14x | -3.48x | -1.22x | 1.69x | 2.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.02x | — | — | 0.49x | 0.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.12x | 0.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 2.48x | 2.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.15x | 1.72x | 0.63x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.42x | 0.43x | 0.11x | 0.57x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.97x | — | — | 5.29x | 2.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN delivers a 39.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-9 for RCON. JFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AIFU scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | -6.1% | -9.2% | +39.7% | +28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | -3.2% | -8.0% | +21.6% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.8% | -7.9% | -10.6% | +39.9% | +23.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.7% | -9.8% | -11.8% | +32.2% | +35.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.59x | 0.08x | 0.02x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $6M | -$64M | -$489M | -$2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $192M | $28M | $99M | $541M | $4.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $206M | $34M | $34M | $52M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.53x | — | -372.30x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JFIN five years ago would be worth $12,123 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs QFIN's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JFIN at 10.9% vs AIFU's -59.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.3% | -10.3% | -45.8% | -17.9% | -22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.7% | -5.4% | -49.1% | -54.2% | -63.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | +0.5% | -88.7% | +36.4% | +0.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | -69.3% | -99.4% | +21.2% | -19.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +246.9% | -78.5% | -99.3% | -56.7% | +16.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.2% | +0.2% | -51.6% | +10.9% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QFIN's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.27x | 0.47x | 1.19x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.40 | $1.88 | $7.16 | $19.23 | $47.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $0.80 | $0.75 | $3.71 | $12.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.1% | +48.2% | +11.7% | +25.7% | +28.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 49.8 | 42.5 | 54.0 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 15K | 90K | 63K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and JFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JFIN as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy". For income investors, JFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 16.87% vs QFIN's 9.26%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $28.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.6% | — | +16.9% | +9.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 | — | $5.67 | $8.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +11.6% |
JFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). QFIN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
AIFU vs CLPS vs RCON vs JFIN vs QFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 4% for AIFU Inc. (AIFU). Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN?
On trailing P/E, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus AIFU Inc. at 353. 1x. On forward P/E, AIFU Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qfin Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 02x versus Jiayin Group Inc. 's 0. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) delivered a total return of +21. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIFU returned +246. 9% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Qfin Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning QFIN is approximately 341% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.
2% versus -43. 4% for AIFU Inc. (AIFU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, JFIN leads at 48. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -86. 5% for RCON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JFIN leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Jiayin Group Inc. 's 0. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, AIFU Inc. (AIFU) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 5x for Jiayin Group Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN?
In this comparison, JFIN (16.
9% yield), CLPS (14. 6% yield), QFIN (9. 3% yield) pay a dividend. AIFU, RCON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AIFU or CLPS or RCON or JFIN or QFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, AIFU: +246. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIFU and CLPS and RCON and JFIN and QFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AIFU (Financial Services) and CLPS (Technology) and RCON (Energy) and JFIN (Communication Services) and QFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AIFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. CLPS, JFIN, QFIN pay a dividend while AIFU, RCON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 6.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.