Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AIIO vs BBAI vs PLTR vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Security & Protection Services
AIIO vs BBAI vs PLTR vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $13M | $19.77B | $315.76B | $11M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26M | $127M | $5.22B | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-165M | $-289M | $2.28B | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | -27.1% | 25.8% | 84.1% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | -477.0% | -68.3% | 38.1% | -27.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 96.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $27M | $24M | $229M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $87M | $1.42B | $22M |
AIIO vs BBAI vs PLTR vs GFAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robo.ai Inc. (AIIO) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 43.0 | -57.0% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 100 | 598.1 | +498.1% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIIO vs BBAI vs PLTR vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIIO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BBAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +28.6% vs AIIO's -94.0%
PLTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.69
- Rev growth 56.2%, EPS growth 231.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
- 13.5% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 7.11x
GFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.2% revenue growth vs AIIO's -92.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.7% margin vs AIIO's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs BBAI's 3.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.6% vs AIIO's -94.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.4% ROA vs AIIO's -88.5% |
AIIO vs BBAI vs PLTR vs GFAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AIIO vs BBAI vs PLTR vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLTR leads in 4 of 6 categories
GFAI leads 1 • AIIO leads 0 • BBAI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 202.6x AIIO's $26M. PLTR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIIO's -6.4%. On growth, AIIO holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26M | $127M | $5.2B | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$122M | -$75M | $2.0B | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$165M | -$289M | $2.3B | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$56M | $2.7B | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -27.1% | +25.8% | +84.1% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -68.3% | +38.1% | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | -2.3% | +43.7% | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.3% | -44.3% | +51.5% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | -0.9% | +84.7% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.1% | +52.0% | +3.1% | +38.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GFAI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $19.8B | $315.8B | $11M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $19.7B | $314.6B | -$8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -5.10x | 218.73x | -0.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 96.90x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 218.43x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.23x | 154.88x | 70.55x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 24.51x | 47.21x | 0.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 150.32x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR delivers a 31.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-196 for AIIO. PLTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GFAI's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLTR scores 8/9 vs AIIO's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -195.8% | -50.7% | +31.7% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -88.5% | -35.3% | +26.4% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -19.5% | +22.3% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -19.6% | +21.6% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.03x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | -$63M | -$1.2B | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $87M | $1.4B | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $24M | $229M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.27x | -18.17x | — | -167.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth $74,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for AIIO. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +28.6% total return vs AIIO's -94.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLTR at 161.1% vs AIIO's -84.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -86.1% | -28.4% | -17.9% | -20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.0% | +28.6% | +15.7% | -51.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +49.8% | +1680.4% | -93.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -57.0% | +646.1% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -57.5% | +1350.5% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.1% | +14.4% | +161.1% | -59.4% |
Risk & Volatility
PLTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLTR is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLTR currently trades 66.4% from its 52-week high vs AIIO's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 3.31x | 1.69x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.60 | $9.39 | $207.52 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $3.01 | $112.07 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +44.5% | +66.4% | +33.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.8 | 57.1 | 44.9 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 34.5M | 46.3M | 315K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", PLTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.5% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 39.2% for PLTR (target: $192).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $191.83 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 26 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
PLTR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GFAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AIIO vs BBAI vs PLTR vs GFAI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIIO or BBAI or PLTR or GFAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger pick with 56. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 1% for Robo. ai Inc. (AIIO). Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) offers the better valuation at 218. 7x trailing P/E (96. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIIO or BBAI or PLTR or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) delivered a total return of +646. 1%, compared to -99. 6% for Robo. ai Inc. (AIIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLTR returned +1351% versus AIIO's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIIO or BBAI or PLTR or GFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 95% more volatile than PLTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 8% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AIIO or BBAI or PLTR or GFAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is pulling ahead at 56. 2% versus -92. 1% for Robo. ai Inc. (AIIO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palantir Technologies Inc. grew EPS 231. 6% year-over-year, compared to 10. 3% for Robo. ai Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLTR leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AIIO or BBAI or PLTR or GFAI?
Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 3% net margin versus -176. 1% for Robo. ai Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLTR leads at 31. 6% versus -165. 7% for AIIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTR leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AIIO or BBAI or PLTR or GFAI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43.
5% to $6. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AIIO or BBAI or PLTR or GFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AIIO or BBAI or PLTR or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1351% 10Y return). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLTR: +1351%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AIIO and BBAI and PLTR and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AIIO (Consumer Cyclical) and BBAI (Technology) and PLTR (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AIIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PLTR is a large-cap high-growth stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.