Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AIRJ vs MSEX vs XYL vs FELE vs AWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Regulated Water
AIRJ vs MSEX vs XYL vs FELE vs AWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Regulated Water | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $211M | $955M | $27.49B | $4.41B | $24.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $199M | $9.09B | $2.18B | $5.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-927K | $44M | $973M | $150M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.3% | 38.6% | 35.2% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.1% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.9x | 20.1x | 20.9x | 21.8x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $154K | $419M | $1.94B | $280M | $15.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $3M | $1.48B | $100M | $119M |
AIRJ vs MSEX vs XYL vs FELE vs AWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AirJoule Technologi… (AIRJ) | 100 | 35.6 | -64.4% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 118.2 | +18.2% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 83.5 | -16.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIRJ vs MSEX vs XYL vs FELE vs AWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIRJ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.9x vs 20.7x)
MSEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 22.1% margin vs AIRJ's 0.3%
- 2.7% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.91 vs MSEX's 12.58
FELE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.1%
- 231.4% 10Y total return vs XYL's 204.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
AWK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 5.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.7%
- 9.7% revenue growth vs AIRJ's -100.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs AIRJ's -100.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.9x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs AIRJ's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs AIRJ's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs AIRJ's -25.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs AIRJ's -0.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs -45.3% |
AIRJ vs MSEX vs XYL vs FELE vs AWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AIRJ vs MSEX vs XYL vs FELE vs AWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FELE leads in 3 of 6 categories
AIRJ leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • XYL leads 0 • AWK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MSEX and XYL and AWK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL and AIRJ operate at a comparable scale, with $9.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. MSEX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FELE's 6.9%. On growth, MSEX holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $199M | $9.1B | $2.2B | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $81M | $1.8B | $322M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$926,770 | $44M | $973M | $150M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$19M | $966M | $169M | -$1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +33.3% | +38.6% | +35.2% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +28.1% | +13.6% | +12.6% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +22.1% | +10.7% | +6.9% | +21.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -9.7% | +10.6% | +7.8% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.0% | +2.7% | +9.9% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -110.9% | -100.0% | +14.5% | +13.4% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FELE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, AIRJ trades at a 97% valuation discount to FELE's 30.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYL offers better value at 1.29x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $211M | $955M | $27.5B | $4.4B | $24.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $183M | $1.4B | $27.9B | $4.6B | $40.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.86x | 21.78x | 29.50x | 30.75x | 22.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.12x | 20.91x | 21.77x | 20.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.62x | 1.29x | 3.53x | 2.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.79x | 15.54x | 13.82x | 14.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.91x | 3.04x | 2.07x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 1.89x | 2.40x | 3.41x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 30.21x | 22.81x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-0 for AIRJ. AIRJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWK's 1.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XYL scores 6/9 vs MSEX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | +9.1% | +8.5% | +11.4% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +3.2% | +5.6% | +7.6% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -45.3% | +4.7% | +7.6% | +14.7% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.6% | +4.4% | +8.5% | +18.1% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.85x | 0.17x | 0.21x | 1.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $416M | $463M | $181M | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $3M | $1.5B | $100M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154,229 | $419M | $1.9B | $280M | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.33x | 49.32x | 24.75x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FELE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FELE five years ago would be worth $12,034 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,519 for AIRJ. Over the past 12 months, FELE leads with a +17.7% total return vs AIRJ's -25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XYL at 3.8% vs AIRJ's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.9% | +3.0% | -15.3% | +3.6% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.8% | -12.8% | -3.2% | +17.7% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | -25.2% | +11.9% | +10.0% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | -28.4% | +2.6% | +20.3% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | +62.9% | +204.7% | +231.4% | +100.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.4% | -9.2% | +3.8% | +3.2% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FELE and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIRJ's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FELE currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs AIRJ's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | -0.12x | 0.92x | 0.92x | -0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.75 | $62.18 | $154.27 | $111.53 | $150.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $44.17 | $114.15 | $83.42 | $121.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +82.7% | +75.0% | +89.6% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 44.1 | 45.4 | 54.8 | 33.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 351K | 160K | 2.1M | 281K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MSEX and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIRJ as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy", XYL as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", AWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 101.1% upside for AIRJ (target: $7) vs 0.1% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, MSEX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.67% vs FELE's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $53.50 | $151.57 | $100.00 | $134.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 4 | 40 | 11 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 21 | 15 | 32 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.37 | $1.60 | $1.11 | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +3.8% | 0.0% |
FELE leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
AIRJ vs MSEX vs XYL vs FELE vs AWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK?
On trailing P/E, AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) is the cheapest at 0.
9x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, Middlesex Water Company is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 91x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK?
Over the past 5 years, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) delivered a total return of +20. 3%, compared to -64. 8% for AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FELE returned +231. 4% versus AIRJ's -64. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus AirJoule Technologies Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning AIRJ is approximately -452% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 147% for American Water Works Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AirJoule Technologies Corporation grew EPS 117. 5% year-over-year, compared to -15. 8% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for AirJoule Technologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 0. 0% for AIRJ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWK leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIRJ: 101. 1% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK?
In this comparison, MSEX (2.
7% yield), AWK (2. 6% yield), XYL (1. 4% yield), FELE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AIRJ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AIRJ or MSEX or XYL or FELE or AWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, AIRJ: -64. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIRJ and MSEX and XYL and FELE and AWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (AIRJ (Industrials) and MSEX (Utilities) and XYL (Industrials) and FELE (Industrials) and AWK (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AIRJ is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XYL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSEX, XYL, FELE, AWK pay a dividend while AIRJ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.