REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs UDR vs CPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs UDR vs CPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $596M | $25.77B | $24.82B | $12.04B | $10.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $193M | $3.04B | $3.12B | $1.72B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $554M | $1.05B | $954M | $491M | $388M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 67.0% | 46.3% | 46.0% | 61.3% |
| Operating Margin | 66.3% | 30.1% | 28.5% | 27.4% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.1x | 37.6x | 50.9x | 66.1x | 68.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $9.33B | $8.78B | $6.19B | $3.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $395M | $187M | $56M | $37M | $25M |
AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs UDR vs CPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apartment Investmen… (AIV) | 100 | 86.6 | -13.4% |
| AvalonBay Communiti… (AVB) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 109.4 | +9.4% |
| UDR, Inc. (UDR) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
| Camden Property Tru… (CPT) | 100 | 114.4 | +14.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs UDR vs CPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 86.9% 10Y total return vs CPT's 71.7%
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 68.4x)
- 287.7% margin vs UDR's 28.6%
- 69.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UDR's 4.6%
AVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth -2.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 4.3% FFO/revenue growth vs AIV's -100.0%
EQR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
UDR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 4.6%
- PEG 1.60 vs EQR's 10.00
- Beta 0.39, yield 4.6%, current ratio 3.31x
CPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 87.9%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.36 vs AIV's 0.69
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% FFO/revenue growth vs AIV's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 68.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 287.7% margin vs UDR's 28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs AIV's 0.69 | |
| Dividends | 69.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UDR's 4.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.6% vs UDR's -10.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.6% ROA vs CPT's 4.3%, ROIC 4.2% vs 2.6% |
AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs UDR vs CPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs UDR vs CPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AIV leads in 2 of 6 categories
AVB leads 0 • EQR leads 0 • UDR leads 0 • CPT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 16.2x AIV's $193M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (AIV) to 28.6% (UDR). On growth, AVB holds the edge at +3.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $193M | $3.0B | $3.1B | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $186M | $1.8B | $1.9B | $1.1B | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $554M | $1.1B | $954M | $491M | $388M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$230M | $1.5B | $1.3B | $892M | $714M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +67.0% | +46.3% | +46.0% | +61.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +66.3% | +30.1% | +28.5% | +27.4% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +34.6% | +30.6% | +28.6% | +32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -119.5% | +49.7% | +42.7% | +52.0% | +60.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | +3.7% | +2.5% | +0.9% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.9% | -40.9% | -64.2% | +147.8% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AIV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, AIV trades at a 97% valuation discount to UDR's 32.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UDR offers better value at 0.79x vs AVB's 5.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $596M | $25.8B | $24.8B | $12.0B | $11.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $201M | $34.9B | $33.6B | $18.2B | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.10x | 25.07x | 22.77x | 32.69x | 29.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.61x | 50.91x | 66.06x | 68.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.36x | 4.47x | 0.79x | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.01x | 19.11x | 15.68x | 18.15x | 16.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.48x | 8.00x | 7.03x | 6.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 2.22x | 2.26x | 2.95x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.23x | 19.25x | 19.61x | 28.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AIV and EQR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AIV delivers a 162.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $163 in annual profit, vs $8 for EQR. EQR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UDR's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UDR scores 7/9 vs AIV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +162.9% | +8.8% | +8.4% | +12.4% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +29.6% | +4.8% | +4.6% | +4.7% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +3.3% | +4.2% | +2.3% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +4.4% | +5.7% | +3.1% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.79x | 0.77x | 1.49x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$395M | $9.1B | $8.7B | $6.2B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $395M | $187M | $56M | $37M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $9.3B | $8.8B | $6.2B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 5.07x | 5.58x | — | 3.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AIV and EQR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIV five years ago would be worth $12,915 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,016 for UDR. Over the past 12 months, AIV leads with a -1.6% total return vs UDR's -10.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQR at 5.5% vs UDR's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.4% | +3.6% | +9.1% | +3.0% | -4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.6% | -8.4% | -2.5% | -10.1% | -8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.8% | +14.5% | +17.4% | +1.8% | +6.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +16.3% | +10.4% | +0.2% | +5.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +33.1% | +32.0% | +41.5% | +71.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +4.6% | +5.5% | +0.6% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EQR and CPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIV's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQR currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs AIV's 47.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.48x | 0.38x | 0.39x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.87 | $211.65 | $71.80 | $43.62 | $121.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.94 | $160.09 | $57.58 | $32.94 | $96.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.9% | +87.5% | +92.3% | +84.7% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 66.3 | 66.9 | 59.9 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 931K | 2.3M | 3.2M | 986K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIV and UDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIV as "Hold", AVB as "Hold", EQR as "Hold", UDR as "Buy", CPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 135.3% upside for AIV (target: $10) vs 3.5% for AVB (target: $192). For income investors, AIV offers the higher dividend yield at 69.32% vs AVB's 3.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $191.70 | $70.15 | $40.25 | $112.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 42 | 46 | 38 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +69.3% | +3.8% | +4.1% | +4.6% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.95 | $6.99 | $2.69 | $1.72 | $4.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.9% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +2.5% |
AIV leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 4 categories are tied.
AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs UDR vs CPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
(AVB) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UDR, Inc. (UDR) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT?
On trailing P/E, Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the cheapest at 1.
1x versus UDR, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UDR, Inc. wins at 1. 60x versus Equity Residential's 10. 00x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT?
Over the past 5 years, Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) delivered a total return of +29.
2%, compared to +0. 2% for UDR, Inc. (UDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIV returned +86. 9% versus EQR's +32. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Camden Property Trust (CPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Apartment Investment and Management Company's 0. 69β — meaning AIV is approximately 90% more volatile than CPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equity Residential (EQR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 149% for UDR, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
(AVB) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apartment Investment and Management Company grew EPS 623. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 8% for AvalonBay Communities, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVB leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT?
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the more profitable company, earning 287.
7% net margin versus 22. 1% for UDR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 287. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIV leads at 66. 3% versus 18. 4% for CPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVB leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, UDR, Inc. (UDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 60x versus Equity Residential's 10. 00x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) trades at 37. 6x forward P/E versus 68. 4x for Camden Property Trust — 30. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIV: 135. 3% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the highest yield at 69. 3%, versus 3. 8% for AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB).
09Is AIV or AVB or EQR or UDR or CPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Camden Property Trust (CPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPT: +71. 7%, AIV: +86. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIV and AVB and EQR and UDR and CPT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AIV is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; UDR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CPT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.