Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AJG vs WTW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
AJG vs WTW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $50.63B | $23.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.94B | $9.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.49B | $1.67B |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 22.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $14.00B | $6.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.40B | $3.13B |
AJG vs WTW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur J. Gallagher… (AJG) | 100 | 208.9 | +108.9% |
| Willis Towers Watso… (WTW) | 100 | 124.4 | +24.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AJG vs WTW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AJG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 20.7%, EPS growth -11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
- 361.3% 10Y total return vs WTW's 131.6%
WTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.79 vs AJG's 2.30
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.20x
- Lower P/E (12.9x vs 14.9x), PEG 0.79 vs 2.30
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.7% revenue growth vs WTW's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 14.9x), PEG 0.79 vs 2.30 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs AJG's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs WTW's 0.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WTW's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.7% vs AJG's -41.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.8% ROA vs AJG's 2.0%, ROIC 14.0% vs 7.0% |
AJG vs WTW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AJG vs WTW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AJG and WTW operate at a comparable scale, with $13.9B and $9.9B in trailing revenue. WTW is the more profitable business, keeping 16.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AJG's 10.7%. On growth, AJG holds the edge at +33.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.9B | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.7B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +22.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +16.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +15.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.6% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.2% | +33.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WTW leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, WTW trades at a 55% valuation discount to AJG's 34.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTW offers better value at 0.95x vs AJG's 5.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50.6B | $23.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $63.2B | $27.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.25x | 15.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.88x | 12.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.28x | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.22x | 10.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.63x | 2.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.20x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.36x | 15.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WTW leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTW delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $6 for AJG. AJG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTW's 0.86x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +20.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +14.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +14.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.6B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.0B | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.97x | 8.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AJG five years ago would be worth $13,994 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,113 for WTW. Over the past 12 months, WTW leads with a -16.7% total return vs AJG's -41.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTW at 4.7% vs AJG's -1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.8% | -22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -41.0% | -16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.1% | +14.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.9% | +1.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +361.3% | +131.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.7% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AJG and WTW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AJG is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTW's 0.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTW currently trades 71.5% from its 52-week high vs AJG's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $351.23 | $352.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $195.00 | $246.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.1% | +71.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.5 | 29.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 658K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AJG and WTW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AJG as "Buy" and WTW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.3% upside for AJG (target: $274) vs 34.1% for WTW (target: $338). For income investors, WTW offers the higher dividend yield at 1.43% vs AJG's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $274.38 | $338.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.56 | $3.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.9% |
WTW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
AJG vs WTW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AJG or WTW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is the stronger pick with 20. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW). Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AJG or WTW?
On trailing P/E, Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. at 34. 2x. On forward P/E, Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 12. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company wins at 0. 79x versus Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 's 2. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AJG or WTW?
Over the past 5 years, Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) delivered a total return of +39. 9%, compared to +1. 1% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AJG returned +361. 3% versus WTW's +131. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AJG or WTW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company's 0. 13β — meaning WTW is approximately 54% more volatile than AJG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 86% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AJG or WTW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is pulling ahead at 20. 7% versus -2. 2% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company grew EPS 1794% year-over-year, compared to -11. 9% for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AJG leads at 17. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AJG or WTW?
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
5% net margin versus 10. 7% for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTW leads at 23. 0% versus 18. 3% for AJG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AJG leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AJG or WTW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 's 2. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AJG: 39. 3% to $274. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — AJG or WTW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 1. 3% for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG).
09Is AJG or WTW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 1. 3% yield, +361. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AJG: +361. 3%, WTW: +131. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AJG and WTW?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AJG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WTW is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.