REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AKR vs KRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
AKR vs KRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.90B | $5.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $409M | $827M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $154M | $286M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 52.3% |
| Operating Margin | 47.1% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | 79.0x | 80.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.92B | $3.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $37M |
AKR vs KRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
| Kite Realty Group T… (KRG) | 100 | 274.7 | +174.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AKR vs KRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AKR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.2%, EPS growth -50.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 14.2% FFO/revenue growth vs KRG's 0.7%
- Lower P/E (79.0x vs 80.9x)
KRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 4.1%
- 31.2% 10Y total return vs AKR's -14.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.44x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.2% FFO/revenue growth vs KRG's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (79.0x vs 80.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.7% margin vs KRG's 34.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs AKR's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs AKR's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.1% vs AKR's +19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs AKR's 3.2%, ROIC 2.3% vs 0.9% |
AKR vs KRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AKR vs KRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $827M annually — 2.0x AKR's $409M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 37.7% (AKR) to 34.6% (KRG). On growth, AKR holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $409M | $827M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $351M | $553M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $154M | $286M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $105M | $255M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +52.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +34.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +30.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.3% | -9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -45.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AKR and KRG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, KRG trades at a 92% valuation discount to AKR's 233.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KRG's 15.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AKR's 23.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $8.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 233.26x | 19.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 79.00x | 80.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.14x | 15.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.07x | 6.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 1.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.39x | 19.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRG delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $6 for AKR. AKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRG's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRG scores 6/9 vs AKR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.73x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.58x | 3.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRG five years ago would be worth $14,894 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,918 for AKR. Over the past 12 months, KRG leads with a +26.1% total return vs AKR's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AKR at 22.3% vs KRG's 13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.1% | +26.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.1% | +44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.2% | +48.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.4% | +31.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.3% | +13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
KRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRG is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AKR's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.36 | $26.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.04 | $20.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AKR as "Buy" and KRG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -5.0% upside for KRG (target: $25) vs -7.5% for AKR (target: $21). For income investors, KRG offers the higher dividend yield at 4.14% vs AKR's 3.49%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $25.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.77 | $1.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.6% |
KRG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AKR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
AKR vs KRG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AKR or KRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) is the stronger pick with 14.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG). Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (80. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AKR or KRG?
On trailing P/E, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus Acadia Realty Trust at 233. 3x. On forward P/E, Acadia Realty Trust is actually cheaper at 79. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AKR or KRG?
Over the past 5 years, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) delivered a total return of +48.
9%, compared to +19. 2% for Acadia Realty Trust (AKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRG returned +31. 2% versus AKR's -14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AKR or KRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Acadia Realty Trust's 0. 63β — meaning AKR is approximately 13% more volatile than KRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 106% for Kite Realty Group Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AKR or KRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) is pulling ahead at 14.
2% versus 0. 7% for Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kite Realty Group Trust grew EPS 73. 6% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Acadia Realty Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, AKR leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AKR or KRG?
Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) is the more profitable company, earning 35.
2% net margin versus 3. 3% for Acadia Realty Trust — meaning it keeps 35. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRG leads at 23. 1% versus 12. 0% for AKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRG leads at 53. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AKR or KRG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) trades at 79.
0x forward P/E versus 80. 9x for Kite Realty Group Trust — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRG: -5. 0% to $25. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AKR or KRG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 3. 5% for Acadia Realty Trust (AKR).
09Is AKR or KRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRG: +31. 2%, AKR: -14. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AKR and KRG?
Both stocks operate in the null sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.