Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AL vs GE vs RTX vs HWM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Industrial - Machinery
AL vs GE vs RTX vs HWM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $7.26B | $316.20B | $238.07B | $109.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.02B | $48.35B | $90.37B | $8.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.09B | $8.66B | $7.26B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 38.4% | 34.8% | 20.2% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.5% | 18.5% | 10.4% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 40.0x | 25.5x | 58.7x |
| Total Debt | $19.73B | $20.49B | $39.51B | $3.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $466M | $12.39B | $7.43B | $742M |
AL vs GE vs RTX vs HWM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air Lease Corporati… (AL) | 100 | 215.9 | +115.9% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 867.5 | +767.5% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 299.0 | +199.0% |
| Howmet Aerospace In… (HWM) | 100 | 1761.9 | +1661.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AL vs GE vs RTX vs HWM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 1.3%
- PEG 0.79 vs GE's 3.39
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 58.7x), PEG 0.79 vs 1.16
- 36.1% margin vs RTX's 8.0%
GE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs RTX's 9.7%
RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.03x
- 1.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AL's 1.3%
HWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 12.4% 10Y total return vs RTX's 234.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 57.0%, current ratio 2.13x
- +73.8% vs AL's +22.5%
- 15.0% ROA vs AL's 3.3%, ROIC 21.1% vs 4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs RTX's 9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 58.7x), PEG 0.79 vs 1.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.1% margin vs RTX's 8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs GE's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.8% vs AL's +22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.0% ROA vs AL's 3.3%, ROIC 21.1% vs 4.2% |
AL vs GE vs RTX vs HWM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AL vs GE vs RTX vs HWM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories
HWM leads 2 • GE leads 0 • RTX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.4B annually — 30.0x AL's $3.0B. AL is the more profitable business, keeping 36.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RTX's 8.0%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $48.4B | $90.4B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $9.9B | $13.8B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $8.7B | $7.3B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.7B | $7.5B | $8.4B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.4% | +34.8% | +20.2% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +18.5% | +10.4% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | +17.9% | +8.0% | +20.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.4% | +15.4% | +9.2% | +16.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | +24.7% | +8.7% | +19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.9% | -1.1% | +32.5% | +71.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, AL trades at a 90% valuation discount to HWM's 73.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AL offers better value at 0.43x vs GE's 3.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $316.2B | $238.1B | $109.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.8B | $324.3B | $270.1B | $111.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.00x | 37.09x | 35.64x | 73.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.76x | 40.02x | 25.54x | 58.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 3.14x | — | 1.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.46x | 20.96x | 46.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 6.90x | 2.69x | 13.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 17.09x | 3.57x | 20.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.53x | 29.98x | 76.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $11 for RTX. HWM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AL's 2.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AL scores 8/9 vs GE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.2% | +45.8% | +10.9% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +6.8% | +4.3% | +15.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +24.7% | +6.7% | +21.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +9.6% | +7.9% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.33x | 1.08x | 0.59x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19.3B | $8.1B | $32.1B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $466M | $12.4B | $7.4B | $742M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.7B | $20.5B | $39.5B | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.32x | 11.69x | 5.58x | 15.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWM five years ago would be worth $81,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,633 for AL. Over the past 12 months, HWM leads with a +73.8% total return vs AL's +22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWM at 84.1% vs AL's 21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -5.5% | -5.2% | +28.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.5% | +44.9% | +40.8% | +73.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.9% | +280.0% | +93.0% | +524.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.3% | +362.5% | +120.1% | +715.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.9% | +121.0% | +234.7% | +1240.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | +56.0% | +24.5% | +84.1% |
Risk & Volatility
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AL is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GE's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs RTX's 82.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 1.14x | 0.51x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.00 | $348.48 | $214.50 | $287.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $51.66 | $208.22 | $126.03 | $154.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +86.8% | +82.4% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 56.4 | 37.3 | 60.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 5.7M | 5.3M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AL and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AL as "Buy", GE as "Buy", RTX as "Buy", HWM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for GE (target: $386) vs 0.0% for AL (target: $65). For income investors, RTX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs HWM's 0.16%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $65.00 | $386.20 | $224.89 | $274.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 34 | 26 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.4% | +1.5% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.87 | $1.36 | $2.63 | $0.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.0% | +0.7% |
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HWM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AL vs GE vs RTX vs HWM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AL or GE or RTX or HWM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). Air Lease Corporation (AL) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Air Lease Corporation (AL) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AL or GE or RTX or HWM?
On trailing P/E, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the cheapest at 7.
0x versus Howmet Aerospace Inc. at 73. 5x. On forward P/E, Air Lease Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Air Lease Corporation wins at 0. 79x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AL or GE or RTX or HWM?
Over the past 5 years, Howmet Aerospace Inc.
(HWM) delivered a total return of +715. 2%, compared to +56. 3% for Air Lease Corporation (AL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWM returned +1240% versus GE's +121. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AL or GE or RTX or HWM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus GE Aerospace's 1. 14β — meaning GE is approximately 284% more volatile than AL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 2% for Air Lease Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AL or GE or RTX or HWM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus 9. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Air Lease Corporation grew EPS 179. 0% year-over-year, compared to 32. 0% for Howmet Aerospace Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AL or GE or RTX or HWM?
Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 7. 6% for RTX Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AL leads at 50. 5% versus 10. 0% for RTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AL leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AL or GE or RTX or HWM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Air Lease Corporation (AL) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 58. 7x for Howmet Aerospace Inc. — 45. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 27. 6% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — AL or GE or RTX or HWM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM).
09Is AL or GE or RTX or HWM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 3% yield, +129. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AL: +129. 9%, GE: +121. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AL and GE and RTX and HWM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AL is a small-cap deep-value stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; HWM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. AL, RTX pay a dividend while GE, HWM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.