Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALAR vs BCYC vs CGNT vs PEPG vs VRNS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALAR
Alarum Technologies Ltd.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$58M
5Y Perf.+37.8%
BCYC
Bicycle Therapeutics plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$339M
5Y Perf.-69.4%
CGNT
Cognyte Software Ltd.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$793M
5Y Perf.+55.4%
PEPG
PepGen Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$123M
5Y Perf.-84.0%
VRNS
Varonis Systems, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.37B
5Y Perf.-13.3%

ALAR vs BCYC vs CGNT vs PEPG vs VRNS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALAR logoALAR
BCYC logoBCYC
CGNT logoCGNT
PEPG logoPEPG
VRNS logoVRNS
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureBiotechnologySoftware - InfrastructureBiotechnologySoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$58M$339M$793M$123M$3.37B
Revenue (TTM)$36M$63M$377M$0.00$660M
Net Income (TTM)$1M$-219M$-5M$-90M$-137M
Gross Margin62.8%-13.3%70.9%78.1%
Operating Margin1.6%-381.6%0.9%-21.9%
Forward P/E9.4x46.9x242.2x
Total Debt$2M$18M$36M$17M$572M
Cash & Equiv.$15M$628M$113M$61M$202M

ALAR vs BCYC vs CGNT vs PEPG vs VRNSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALAR
BCYC
CGNT
PEPG
VRNS
StockMay 22May 26Return
Alarum Technologies… (ALAR)100137.8+37.8%
Bicycle Therapeutic… (BCYC)10030.6-69.4%
Cognyte Software Lt… (CGNT)100155.4+55.4%
PepGen Inc. (PEPG)10016.0-84.0%
Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS)10086.7-13.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALAR vs BCYC vs CGNT vs PEPG vs VRNS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ALAR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. PepGen Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. BCYC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ALAR
Alarum Technologies Ltd.
The Income Pick

ALAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.01
  • Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 160.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 45.9%
  • Lower P/E (9.4x vs 242.2x)
  • 3.3% margin vs BCYC's -345.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BCYC
Bicycle Therapeutics plc
The Growth Leader

BCYC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 105.8% revenue growth vs PEPG's -1.0%
Best for: growth
CGNT
Cognyte Software Ltd.
The Technology Pick

CGNT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
PEPG
PepGen Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PEPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 11.94x
  • Beta 0.17, current ratio 11.94x
  • Beta 0.17 vs ALAR's 2.01
  • +42.1% vs BCYC's -37.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
VRNS
Varonis Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

VRNS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 317.5% 10Y total return vs BCYC's -59.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBCYC logoBCYC105.8% revenue growth vs PEPG's -1.0%
ValueALAR logoALARLower P/E (9.4x vs 242.2x)
Quality / MarginsALAR logoALAR3.3% margin vs BCYC's -345.0%
Stability / SafetyPEPG logoPEPGBeta 0.17 vs ALAR's 2.01
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PEPG logoPEPG+42.1% vs BCYC's -37.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ALAR logoALAR3.2% ROA vs PEPG's -60.4%, ROIC 59.0% vs -73.2%

ALAR vs BCYC vs CGNT vs PEPG vs VRNS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ALARAlarum Technologies Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

BCYCBicycle Therapeutics plc

Segment breakdown not available.

CGNTCognyte Software Ltd.
FY 2025
Technology Service
51.6%$181M
Product
35.9%$126M
Professional Services And Other
12.5%$44M
PEPGPepGen Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

VRNSVaronis Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Software as a Service
74.2%$463M
Subscription and Circulation
17.6%$110M
Maintenance
8.2%$51M

ALAR vs BCYC vs CGNT vs PEPG vs VRNS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLALARLAGGINGVRNS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ALAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

VRNS and PEPG operate at a comparable scale, with $660M and $0 in trailing revenue. ALAR is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCYC's -3.4%. On growth, ALAR holds the edge at +80.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricALAR logoALARAlarum Technologi…BCYC logoBCYCBicycle Therapeut…CGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …PEPG logoPEPGPepGen Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$36M$63M$377M$0$660M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1M-$238M$16M-$90M-$135M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M-$219M-$5M-$90M-$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$229M$11M-$82M$120M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.8%-13.3%+70.9%+78.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.6%-3.8%+0.9%-21.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.3%-3.4%-1.2%-20.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+27.5%-3.6%+3.0%+18.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+80.3%-91.1%+15.5%+26.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-99.0%+1.1%+173.6%+60.3%0.0%
ALAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ALAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ALAR's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CGNT's 83.9x.

MetricALAR logoALARAlarum Technologi…BCYC logoBCYCBicycle Therapeut…CGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …PEPG logoPEPGPepGen Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …
Market CapShares × price$58M$339M$793M$123M$3.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$44M-$272M$715M$80M$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.40x-1.55x-64.71x-0.84x-25.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.46.93x242.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.82x83.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.81x4.67x2.26x5.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.07x0.56x3.64x0.51x6.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.58x23.59x24.99x
ALAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ALAR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALAR delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-76 for PEPG. BCYC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNS's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALAR scores 6/9 vs BCYC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricALAR logoALARAlarum Technologi…BCYC logoBCYCBicycle Therapeut…CGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …PEPG logoPEPGPepGen Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.2%-35.7%-2.0%-75.7%-27.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.2%-29.5%-0.9%-60.4%-8.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+59.0%-2.5%-73.2%-11.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+32.8%-32.0%-1.8%-63.4%-14.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–962545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.03x0.16x0.12x0.96x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$13M-$611M-$77M-$44M$369M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$628M$113M$61M$202M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$18M$36M$17M$572M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.18x-1465.53x21.71x-9.01x
ALAR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ALAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALAR five years ago would be worth $6,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,389 for PEPG. Over the past 12 months, PEPG leads with a +42.1% total return vs BCYC's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALAR at 60.6% vs PEPG's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALAR logoALARAlarum Technologi…BCYC logoBCYCBicycle Therapeut…CGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …PEPG logoPEPGPepGen Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.6%-26.8%+23.6%-75.0%-10.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.5%-37.1%+13.4%+42.1%-36.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+314.0%-77.4%+155.8%-88.1%+23.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.6%-84.6%-54.7%-86.1%-39.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-59.3%-60.7%-86.1%+317.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+60.6%-39.1%+36.8%-50.7%+7.3%
ALAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CGNT and PEPG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PEPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALAR's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGNT currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs PEPG's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALAR logoALARAlarum Technologi…BCYC logoBCYCBicycle Therapeut…CGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …PEPG logoPEPGPepGen Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.01x1.65x1.27x0.17x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.00$9.36$11.66$7.80$63.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.50$4.24$6.29$1.01$19.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.4%+52.2%+94.3%+22.9%+44.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.357.066.737.666.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded37K464K496K1.5M2.3M
Evenly matched — CGNT and PEPG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ALAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BCYC as "Buy", CGNT as "Hold", PEPG as "Buy", VRNS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 291.1% upside for PEPG (target: $7) vs -2.3% for CGNT (target: $11).

MetricALAR logoALARAlarum Technologi…BCYC logoBCYCBicycle Therapeut…CGNT logoCGNTCognyte Software …PEPG logoPEPGPepGen Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.67$10.75$7.00$36.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts215634
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.7%0.0%+3.4%
ALAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ALAR leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallAlarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALAR vs BCYC vs CGNT vs PEPG vs VRNS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) is the stronger pick with 105.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT). Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS?

On forward P/E, Cognyte Software Ltd.

is actually cheaper at 46. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS?

Over the past 5 years, Alarum Technologies Ltd.

(ALAR) delivered a total return of -36. 6%, compared to -86. 1% for PepGen Inc. (PEPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRNS returned +317. 5% versus ALAR's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PepGen Inc.

(PEPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Alarum Technologies Ltd. 's 2. 01β — meaning ALAR is approximately 1062% more volatile than PEPG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 96% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) is pulling ahead at 105.

8% versus 11. 9% for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alarum Technologies Ltd. grew EPS 160. 7% year-over-year, compared to -31. 4% for Varonis Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCYC leads at 71. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS?

Alarum Technologies Ltd.

(ALAR) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus -301. 7% for Bicycle Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALAR leads at 21. 1% versus -341. 3% for BCYC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCYC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Cognyte Software Ltd.

(CGNT) trades at 46. 9x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 195. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PEPG: 291. 1% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ALAR or BCYC or CGNT or PEPG or VRNS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, PepGen Inc.

(PEPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17)). Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEPG: -86. 1%, ALAR: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ALAR and BCYC and CGNT and PEPG and VRNS?

These companies operate in different sectors (ALAR (Technology) and BCYC (Healthcare) and CGNT (Technology) and PEPG (Healthcare) and VRNS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ALAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; BCYC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CGNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PEPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ALAR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 40%
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BCYC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CGNT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PEPG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VRNS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ALAR and BCYC and CGNT and PEPG and VRNS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ALAR: 80.3% · BCYC: -91.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.