ALCO vs AVO

For growth investors, Mission Produce, Inc.

(AVO) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO). Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) offers the better valuation at 25. 7x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alico, Inc. (ALCO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Alico, Inc.

(ALCO) delivered a total return of +44. 5%, compared to -29. 6% for Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALCO returned +69. 3% versus AVO's -1. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mission Produce, Inc.

(AVO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Alico, Inc. 's 0. 34β — meaning ALCO is approximately 7% more volatile than AVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 79% for Alico, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mission Produce, Inc.

(AVO) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -5. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mission Produce, Inc. grew EPS 1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -22. 2% for Alico, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVO leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Mission Produce, Inc.

(AVO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 7% net margin versus -334. 3% for Alico, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVO leads at 5. 1% versus -450. 5% for ALCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVO leads at 11. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVO: 39.

6% to $19. 00.

In this comparison, ALCO (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. AVO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alico, Inc.

(ALCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALCO: +69. 3%, AVO: -1. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.