Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ALDX vs KALA vs OCUL vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ALDX vs KALA vs OCUL vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $104M | $618K | $2.12B | $39.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $254K | $52M | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $-36M | $-290M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | — | -3.1% | 87.2% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -150.6% | -5.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 24.7x | — | — | 44.2x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $32M | $80M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55M | $51M | $737M | $1.66B |
ALDX vs KALA vs OCUL vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aldeyra Therapeutic… (ALDX) | 100 | 35.2 | -64.8% |
| KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Ocular Therapeutix,… (OCUL) | 100 | 137.5 | +37.5% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 218.8 | +118.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALDX vs KALA vs OCUL vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALDX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (24.7x vs 44.2x)
KALA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 262.9% revenue growth vs OCUL's -18.7%
OCUL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 12.2%, current ratio 15.39x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 15.39x
- +37.3% vs KALA's -97.6%
ALNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 411.9% 10Y total return vs OCUL's -10.6%
- 13.5% margin vs KALA's -141.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 262.9% revenue growth vs OCUL's -18.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.7x vs 44.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs KALA's -141.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs KALA's 2.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs KALA's -97.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs KALA's -143.2% |
ALDX vs KALA vs OCUL vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ALDX vs KALA vs OCUL vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALNY leads in 3 of 6 categories
OCUL leads 1 • ALDX leads 0 • KALA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY and ALDX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALNY is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KALA's -141.1%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $254,000 | $52M | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$45M | -$38M | -$295M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | -$36M | -$290M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$32M | -$241M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -3.1% | +87.2% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -150.6% | -5.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -141.1% | -5.6% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -126.3% | -4.6% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +0.8% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.0% | +44.6% | -5.3% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALDX and KALA and OCUL and ALNY each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104M | $617,676 | $2.1B | $39.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | -$18M | $1.5B | $39.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.84x | -0.01x | -6.82x | 127.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.71x | — | — | 44.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 70.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 40.90x | 10.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 0.04x | 2.77x | 50.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 84.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-4 for KALA. OCUL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALA's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs ALDX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.7% | -3.9% | -64.6% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -55.5% | -143.2% | -48.4% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | — | — | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.7% | -95.2% | -46.0% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 2.62x | 0.12x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | -$19M | -$657M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55M | $51M | $737M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $32M | $80M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.72x | -6.92x | -24.63x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OCUL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for KALA. Over the past 12 months, OCUL leads with a +37.3% total return vs KALA's -97.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCUL at 14.8% vs KALA's -82.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.0% | -86.6% | -18.1% | -26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.9% | -97.6% | +37.3% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.8% | -99.5% | +51.2% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -100.0% | -40.4% | +125.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | -100.0% | -10.6% | +411.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.5% | -82.6% | +14.8% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ALNY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KALA's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALNY currently trades 59.7% from its 52-week high vs KALA's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 2.09x | 1.27x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.18 | $20.60 | $16.44 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $0.08 | $6.23 | $245.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.0% | +0.4% | +58.9% | +59.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 30.1 | 58.3 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 9.2M | 4.0M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALDX as "Buy", KALA as "Buy", OCUL as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21861.5% upside for KALA (target: $18) vs 50.6% for ALNY (target: $446).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.67 | $18.25 | $25.50 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 9 | 18 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALNY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OCUL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ALDX vs KALA vs OCUL vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL). Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) offers the better valuation at 127. 0x trailing P/E (44. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (ALDX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY?
On forward P/E, Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +411. 9% versus KALA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus KALA BIO, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning KALA is approximately 197% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 3% for KALA BIO, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus -18. 7% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -46. 9% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY?
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -141. 1% for KALA BIO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALNY leads at 13. 5% versus -150. 6% for KALA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCUL leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) trades at 24. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 19. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KALA: 21861. 5% to $18. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ALDX or KALA or OCUL or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +411. 9% 10Y return). KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +411. 9%, KALA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALDX and KALA and OCUL and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALDX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KALA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OCUL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.