Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALEC vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
ALEC vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $269M | $94M | $3.86B | $289M | $28.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $0.00 | $1.10B | $0.00 | $9.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-143M | $-106M | $376M | $-40M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 91.5% | — | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | — | 7.4% | — | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 50.9x | — | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $0.00 | $52M | $0.00 | $6.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $129M | $178M | $103M | $3.01B |
ALEC vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alector, Inc. (ALEC) | 100 | 7.5 | -92.5% |
| Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA) | 100 | 745.8 | +645.8% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| Anavex Life Science… (AVXL) | 100 | 75.9 | -24.1% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 62.3 | -37.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALEC vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +139.2% vs AVXL's -63.2%
SAVA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- -22.9% 10Y total return vs SAVA's -19.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- 11.9% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4%
AVXL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 11.60x
BIIB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.64 vs ALEC's 2.47, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs ALEC's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs ALEC's 2.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +139.2% vs AVXL's -63.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs SAVA's -75.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -6.3% |
ALEC vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ALEC vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories
BIIB leads 2 • SAVA leads 1 • ALEC leads 0 • AVXL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB and AVXL operate at a comparable scale, with $9.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALEC's -6.8%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $0 | $1.1B | $0 | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$156M | -$110M | $96M | -$30M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$143M | -$106M | $376M | -$40M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$184M | -$84M | $212M | -$34M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +91.5% | — | +69.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | — | +7.4% | — | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | — | +34.3% | — | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | — | +19.4% | — | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.5% | — | +9.7% | — | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | +62.1% | -81.8% | +54.4% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 55% valuation discount to BIIB's 21.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $269M | $94M | $3.9B | $289M | $28.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $240M | -$34M | $3.7B | $187M | $32.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.76x | -3.76x | 9.85x | -5.78x | 21.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 50.91x | — | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.91x | — | 11.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.80x | — | 3.61x | — | 2.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.20x | 0.63x | 3.15x | 2.81x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 36.74x | — | 13.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ALEC. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALEC's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs ALEC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | -95.8% | +35.6% | -31.5% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.7% | -75.3% | +26.2% | -30.0% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -170.3% | -6.3% | +10.0% | — | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.0% | -99.9% | +10.1% | -47.8% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | — | 0.04x | — | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$129M | -$126M | -$103M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $129M | $178M | $103M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $0 | $52M | $0 | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — | 6.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACAD five years ago would be worth $10,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,492 for ALEC. Over the past 12 months, ALEC leads with a +139.2% total return vs AVXL's -63.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACAD at 1.5% vs ALEC's -32.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.5% | -6.5% | -13.7% | -15.2% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +139.2% | +25.3% | +52.4% | -63.2% | +63.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | -40.8% | +4.7% | -62.9% | -39.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | -67.0% | +7.1% | -72.4% | -30.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -19.5% | -22.9% | -25.7% | -29.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.5% | -16.0% | +1.5% | -28.1% | -15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALEC's 2.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs AVXL's 22.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.47x | 2.02x | 1.26x | 1.51x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.40 | $4.98 | $27.81 | $13.99 | $202.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.97 | $1.51 | $14.45 | $2.61 | $115.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.8% | +39.3% | +81.1% | +22.3% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 46.8 | 44.2 | 47.0 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 684K | 712K | 1.8M | 1.4M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALEC as "Buy", SAVA as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", AVXL as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 252.6% upside for AVXL (target: $11) vs 10.5% for BIIB (target: $211).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | — | $34.78 | $11.00 | $211.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 12 | 37 | 13 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BIIB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
ALEC vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 1% for Alector, Inc. (ALEC). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alector, Inc. (ALEC) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Biogen Inc. at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, Biogen Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?
Over the past 5 years, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) delivered a total return of +7. 1%, compared to -85. 1% for Alector, Inc. (ALEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAVA returned -19. 5% versus ALEC's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Alector, Inc. 's 2. 47β — meaning ALEC is approximately 286% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 118% for Alector, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -79. 1% for Alector, Inc. (ALEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cassava Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 77. 6% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -679. 2% for Alector, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus -741. 3% for ALEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 37. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVXL: 252. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ALEC or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64)). Alector, Inc. (ALEC) carries a higher beta of 2. 47 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIIB: -29. 2%, ALEC: -86. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALEC and SAVA and ACAD and AVXL and BIIB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.