ALEX vs WHLR vs UE vs NXRT

For growth investors, Urban Edge Properties (UE) is the stronger pick with 6.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 7% for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX). Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (31. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Urban Edge Properties at 29. 8x. On forward P/E, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) delivered a total return of +35. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus UE's +6. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning WHLR is approximately 792% more volatile than ALEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Urban Edge Properties (UE) is pulling ahead at 6.

1% versus -12. 7% for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WHLR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 3% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHLR leads at 36. 4% versus 11. 1% for NXRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) trades at 31. 1x forward P/E versus 47. 5x for Urban Edge Properties — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALEX: 0. 5% to $20. 95.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 3. 4% for Urban Edge Properties (UE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 4. 3% yield). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALEX: +75. 5%, WHLR: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.