Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ALMU vs LITE vs AAOI vs POET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
ALMU vs LITE vs AAOI vs POET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $439M | $64.50B | $11.76B | $1.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $2.49B | $507M | $763K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $440M | $-43M | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 50.2% | 37.7% | 29.6% | -17.0% |
| Operating Margin | -105.0% | 9.5% | -11.6% | -51.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 110.1x | 159.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $941K | $2.61B | $167M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $521M | $216M | $37M |
ALMU vs LITE vs AAOI vs POET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) | 100 | 1162.4 | +1062.4% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1644.4 | +1544.4% |
| Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI) | 100 | 6770.0 | +6670.0% |
| POET Technologies I… (POET) | 100 | 351.7 | +251.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALMU vs LITE vs AAOI vs POET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALMU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.89, Low D/E 5.3%, current ratio 24.59x
- 407.9% revenue growth vs POET's -91.1%
LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.66
- Beta 2.66, current ratio 4.37x
- Better valuation composite
- 17.7% margin vs POET's -66.3%
AAOI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 82.8%, EPS growth 85.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 13.5% 10Y total return vs LITE's 36.8%
POET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 407.9% revenue growth vs POET's -91.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs POET's -66.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.66 vs AAOI's 4.10 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs ALMU's +94.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs POET's -46.9% |
ALMU vs LITE vs AAOI vs POET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALMU vs LITE vs AAOI vs POET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LITE leads in 3 of 6 categories
AAOI leads 2 • ALMU leads 0 • POET leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 3262.6x POET's $762,695. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POET's -66.3%. On growth, POET holds the edge at +80.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $2.5B | $507M | $762,695 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $425M | -$37M | -$36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $440M | -$43M | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$772,780 | $399M | -$239M | -$35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.2% | +37.7% | +29.6% | -17.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -105.0% | +9.5% | -11.6% | -51.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -52.5% | +17.7% | -8.5% | -66.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.8% | +16.0% | -47.1% | -46.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.1% | +90.1% | +51.4% | +80.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.2% | +3.3% | -5.6% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AAOI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $439M | $64.5B | $11.8B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $437M | $66.6B | $11.7B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -106.13x | 2441.70x | -232.72x | -11.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 110.06x | 159.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 869.35x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 94.20x | 39.21x | 25.80x | 9999.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.96x | 55.41x | 12.21x | 31.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-76 for POET. ALMU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs POET's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.7% | +30.7% | -6.1% | -76.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +8.5% | -3.8% | -46.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.6% | -4.3% | -7.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.5% | -4.8% | -8.5% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 2.30x | 0.23x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $2.1B | -$49M | -$30M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $521M | $216M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $941,000 | $2.6B | $167M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.00x | 9.62x | -38.76x | -396.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $197,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,204 for POET. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1275.9% total return vs ALMU's +94.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.4% vs POET's 35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.1% | +134.0% | +276.1% | +52.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.2% | +1275.9% | +909.1% | +147.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +510.3% | +1786.5% | +8314.7% | +147.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1120.5% | +1018.5% | +1878.0% | +42.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1120.5% | +3680.0% | +1351.7% | +12.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +82.7% | +166.2% | +3.4% | +35.3% |
Risk & Volatility
LITE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LITE is the less volatile stock with a 2.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LITE currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs POET's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.89x | 2.66x | 4.10x | 3.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.73 | $1021.00 | $191.87 | $15.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.20 | $63.98 | $12.56 | $3.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.0% | +88.5% | +77.6% | +70.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 53.3 | 54.0 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 6.5M | 12.7M | 27.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALMU as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", AAOI as "Buy", POET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.4% upside for ALMU (target: $25) vs -50.0% for AAOI (target: $75).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $918.67 | $74.50 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 25 | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LITE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AAOI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
ALMU vs LITE vs AAOI vs POET: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aeluma, Inc.
(ALMU) is the stronger pick with 407. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -91. 1% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) offers the better valuation at 2441. 7x trailing P/E (110. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET?
On forward P/E, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 110. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1878%, compared to +42. 0% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 8% versus POET's +12. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 66β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 10β — meaning AAOI is approximately 54% more volatile than LITE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aeluma, Inc.
(ALMU) is pulling ahead at 407. 9% versus -91. 1% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -84. 3% for POET Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAOI leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET?
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -1368. 6% for POET Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LITE leads at -10. 9% versus -725. 7% for POET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POET leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) trades at 110. 1x forward P/E versus 159. 3x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 49. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALMU: 2. 4% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ALMU or LITE or AAOI or POET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1352% 10Y return). POET Technologies Inc. (POET) carries a higher beta of 3. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAOI: +1352%, POET: +12. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALMU and LITE and AAOI and POET?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALMU is a small-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POET is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.