Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALMU vs POET vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
ALMU vs POET vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $439M | $1.67B | $64.50B | $11.76B | $4.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $763K | $2.49B | $507M | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-51M | $440M | $-43M | $214M |
| Gross Margin | 50.2% | -17.0% | 37.7% | 29.6% | 73.5% |
| Operating Margin | -105.0% | -51.5% | 9.5% | -11.6% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 110.1x | 159.3x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $941K | $7M | $2.61B | $167M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $37M | $521M | $216M | $138M |
ALMU vs POET vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) | 100 | 1162.4 | +1062.4% |
| POET Technologies I… (POET) | 100 | 351.7 | +251.7% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1644.4 | +1544.4% |
| Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI) | 100 | 6770.0 | +6670.0% |
| Universal Display C… (OLED) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALMU vs POET vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALMU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 407.9% revenue growth vs POET's -91.1%
POET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LITE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +12.8% vs OLED's -34.2%
AAOI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 82.8%, EPS growth 85.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 13.5% 10Y total return vs LITE's 36.8%
OLED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.06x
- Beta 1.33, yield 2.0%, current ratio 10.06x
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 159.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 407.9% revenue growth vs POET's -91.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 159.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.1% margin vs POET's -66.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs AAOI's 4.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs OLED's -34.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs POET's -46.9% |
ALMU vs POET vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALMU vs POET vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OLED leads in 4 of 6 categories
AAOI leads 1 • ALMU leads 0 • POET leads 0 • LITE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 3262.6x POET's $762,695. OLED is the more profitable business, keeping 34.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POET's -66.3%. On growth, POET holds the edge at +80.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $762,695 | $2.5B | $507M | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$36M | $425M | -$37M | $259M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$51M | $440M | -$43M | $214M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$772,780 | -$35M | $399M | -$239M | $237M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.2% | -17.0% | +37.7% | +29.6% | +73.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -105.0% | -51.5% | +9.5% | -11.6% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -52.5% | -66.3% | +17.7% | -8.5% | +34.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.8% | -46.2% | +16.0% | -47.1% | +37.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.1% | +80.0% | +90.1% | +51.4% | -14.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.2% | +50.0% | +3.3% | -5.6% | -43.7% |
Valuation Metrics
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, OLED trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2441.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OLED's 14.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 869.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $439M | $1.7B | $64.5B | $11.8B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $437M | $1.6B | $66.6B | $11.7B | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -106.13x | -11.63x | 2441.70x | -232.72x | 18.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 110.06x | 159.35x | 21.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 869.35x | — | 14.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 94.20x | 9999.00x | 39.21x | 25.80x | 6.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.96x | 31.85x | 55.41x | 12.21x | 2.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 27.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OLED leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-76 for POET. OLED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs POET's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.7% | -76.1% | +30.7% | -6.1% | +12.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | -46.9% | +8.5% | -3.8% | +11.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.6% | — | -4.3% | -7.9% | +11.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.5% | -2.3% | -4.8% | -8.5% | +14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.35x | 2.30x | 0.23x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$30M | $2.1B | -$49M | -$95M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $37M | $521M | $216M | $138M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $941,000 | $7M | $2.6B | $167M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.00x | -396.56x | 9.62x | -38.76x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $197,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,832 for OLED. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1275.9% total return vs OLED's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.4% vs OLED's -11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.1% | +52.7% | +134.0% | +276.1% | -24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.2% | +147.4% | +1275.9% | +909.1% | -34.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +510.3% | +147.4% | +1786.5% | +8314.7% | -30.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1120.5% | +42.0% | +1018.5% | +1878.0% | -51.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1120.5% | +12.8% | +3680.0% | +1351.7% | +84.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +82.7% | +35.3% | +166.2% | +3.4% | -11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LITE and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OLED is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LITE currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs OLED's 56.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.89x | 3.15x | 2.66x | 4.10x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.73 | $15.50 | $1021.00 | $191.87 | $163.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.20 | $3.87 | $63.98 | $12.56 | $83.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.0% | +70.6% | +88.5% | +77.6% | +56.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 55.3 | 53.3 | 54.0 | 44.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 27.4M | 6.5M | 12.7M | 823K |
Analyst Outlook
OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALMU as "Buy", POET as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", AAOI as "Buy", OLED as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.7% upside for OLED (target: $141) vs -50.0% for AAOI (target: $75). OLED is the only dividend payer here at 1.96% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $8.00 | $918.67 | $74.50 | $141.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 25 | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
OLED leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AAOI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ALMU vs POET vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aeluma, Inc.
(ALMU) is the stronger pick with 407. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -91. 1% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). Universal Display Corporation (OLED) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED?
On trailing P/E, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the cheapest at 18.
1x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2441. 7x. On forward P/E, Universal Display Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1878%, compared to -51. 7% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 8% versus POET's +12. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 10β — meaning AAOI is approximately 208% more volatile than OLED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aeluma, Inc.
(ALMU) is pulling ahead at 407. 9% versus -91. 1% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -84. 3% for POET Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAOI leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED?
Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
2% net margin versus -1368. 6% for POET Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus -725. 7% for POET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POET leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) trades at 21.
7x forward P/E versus 159. 3x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 137. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OLED: 53. 7% to $141. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED?
In this comparison, OLED (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. ALMU, POET, LITE, AAOI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALMU or POET or LITE or AAOI or OLED better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.
0% yield). POET Technologies Inc. (POET) carries a higher beta of 3. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +84. 8%, POET: +12. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALMU and POET and LITE and AAOI and OLED?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALMU is a small-cap high-growth stock; POET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OLED is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OLED pays a dividend while ALMU, POET, LITE, AAOI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.