Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALT vs NRXP vs AXSM vs VKTX vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ALT vs NRXP vs AXSM vs VKTX vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $343M | $85M | $11.19B | $3.63B | $8.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41K | $242K | $708M | $0.00 | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-88M | $-38M | $-188M | $-472M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | -364.5% | 59.5% | 92.6% | — | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | -2304.6% | -63.0% | -24.8% | — | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $34M | $631K | $241M | $137K | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $8M | $323M | $166M | $214M |
ALT vs NRXP vs AXSM vs VKTX vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) | 100 | 33.3 | -66.7% |
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
| Axsome Therapeutics… (AXSM) | 100 | 282.4 | +182.4% |
| Viking Therapeutics… (VKTX) | 100 | 438.2 | +338.2% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALT vs NRXP vs AXSM vs VKTX vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 18.55x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 18.55x
- 105.0% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1%
Among these 5 stocks, NRXP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AXSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.67
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 38.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 133.7%
- Beta 0.67 vs NRXP's 1.89
- +99.7% vs ALT's -46.7%
VKTX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 25.6% 10Y total return vs AXSM's 18.6%
- 4.7% margin vs ALT's -2.1K%
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -2.5% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 105.0% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs ALT's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs NRXP's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.7% vs ALT's -46.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.5% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9% |
ALT vs NRXP vs AXSM vs VKTX vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALT vs NRXP vs AXSM vs VKTX vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRL leads in 3 of 6 categories
AXSM leads 2 • ALT leads 0 • NRXP leads 0 • VKTX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL and VKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. CRL is the more profitable business, keeping -4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALT's -2148.6%. On growth, ALT holds the edge at +4.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41,000 | $242,000 | $708M | $0 | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$94M | -$31M | -$167M | -$502M | $824M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$88M | -$38M | -$188M | -$472M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$68M | -$12M | -$71M | -$340M | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -364.5% | +59.5% | +92.6% | — | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2304.6% | -63.0% | -24.8% | — | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2148.6% | -157.3% | -26.6% | — | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1654.7% | -49.0% | -10.0% | — | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | — | +57.4% | — | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | -80.0% | -3.3% | -2.3% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $343M | $85M | $11.2B | $3.6B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $333M | $78M | $11.1B | $3.5B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.09x | -2.30x | -59.07x | -9.82x | -61.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 16.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8356.77x | 69.60x | 17.52x | — | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | — | 122.48x | 5.52x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 16.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRL delivers a -5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AXSM. VKTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXSM's 2.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 5/9 vs VKTX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -49.4% | — | -2.6% | -71.3% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.7% | -4.9% | -27.8% | -65.3% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -46.7% | — | -19.1% | -44.4% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.0% | — | -52.1% | -51.8% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | — | 2.73x | 0.00x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$7M | -$82M | -$166M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $8M | $323M | $166M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $631,000 | $241M | $137,000 | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -54.74x | -24.18x | -34.13x | -15687.44x | 4.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VKTX five years ago would be worth $54,487 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $96 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, AXSM leads with a +99.7% total return vs ALT's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXSM at 40.9% vs NRXP's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.0% | +17.6% | +21.7% | -11.5% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.7% | +50.2% | +99.7% | +12.5% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.2% | -50.3% | +179.7% | +37.1% | -6.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.4% | -99.0% | +299.7% | +444.9% | -46.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1213.1% | -96.8% | +1861.9% | +2555.1% | +114.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | -20.8% | +40.9% | +11.1% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AXSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AXSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXSM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs ALT's 40.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.89x | 0.67x | 1.54x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.73 | $3.84 | $233.75 | $43.15 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.56 | $1.62 | $96.09 | $22.96 | $132.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.0% | +80.2% | +93.0% | +72.6% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 65.0 | 75.4 | 44.2 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 924K | 658K | 2.3M | 792K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALT as "Buy", AXSM as "Buy", VKTX as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 264.1% upside for ALT (target: $11) vs 16.2% for CRL (target: $206).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.25 | — | $255.81 | $100.75 | $206.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | — | 25 | 24 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
CRL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AXSM leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
ALT vs NRXP vs AXSM vs VKTX vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALT or NRXP or AXSM or VKTX or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Altimmune, Inc.
(ALT) is the stronger pick with 105. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Analysts rate Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ALT or NRXP or AXSM or VKTX or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
(VKTX) delivered a total return of +444. 9%, compared to -99. 0% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VKTX returned +25. 6% versus NRXP's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ALT or NRXP or AXSM or VKTX or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning NRXP is approximately 184% more volatile than AXSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ALT or NRXP or AXSM or VKTX or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Altimmune, Inc.
(ALT) is pulling ahead at 105. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 43. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXSM leads at 133. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ALT or NRXP or AXSM or VKTX or CRL?
Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
(VKTX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -2148. 6% for Altimmune, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRL leads at 12. 6% versus -2304. 6% for ALT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXSM leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ALT or NRXP or AXSM or VKTX or CRL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALT: 264.
1% to $11. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — ALT or NRXP or AXSM or VKTX or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ALT or NRXP or AXSM or VKTX or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), +1862% 10Y return). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXSM: +1862%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ALT and NRXP and AXSM and VKTX and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AXSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.