REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMH vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
AMH vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $11.78B | $132.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.85B | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $453M | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 31.4% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | 44.7x | 41.6x |
| Total Debt | $5.13B | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $109M | $1.32B |
AMH vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Homes 4 Re… (AMH) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMH vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 3.8%
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 9.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 66.5%, current ratio 62.90x
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 265.6% 10Y total return vs AMH's 121.9%
- 36.7% margin vs AMH's 24.4%
- +40.7% vs AMH's -13.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | PEG 1.49 vs 3.84 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs AMH's 24.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs PLD's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.7% vs AMH's -13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs PLD's 3.3%, ROIC 2.7% vs 3.8% |
AMH vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMH vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 4.7x AMH's $1.9B. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMH's 24.4%. On growth, PLD holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $453M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $864M | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMH leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.5x trailing earnings, AMH trades at a 23% valuation discount to PLD's 35.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMH offers better value at 0.82x vs PLD's 3.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.8B | $132.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.8B | $162.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.49x | 35.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.71x | 41.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | 3.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.57x | 23.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.31x | 16.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.79x | 27.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMH delivers a 5.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $6 for PLD. PLD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMH's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMH scores 6/9 vs PLD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.0B | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.77x | 5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLD five years ago would be worth $13,980 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,044 for AMH. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +40.7% total return vs AMH's -13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLD at 6.6% vs AMH's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.1% | +40.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | +21.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.4% | +39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.9% | +265.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | +6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMH and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMH is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLD currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs AMH's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.07 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.21 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.0% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMH and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMH as "Buy" and PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.9% upside for AMH (target: $35) vs 1.1% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, AMH offers the higher dividend yield at 3.82% vs PLD's 2.62%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.0% |
PLD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AMH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
AMH vs PLD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMH or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMH or PLD?
On trailing P/E, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the cheapest at 27.
5x versus Prologis, Inc. at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, Prologis, Inc. is actually cheaper at 41. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Homes 4 Rent wins at 1. 49x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 84x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMH or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) delivered a total return of +39. 8%, compared to +0. 4% for American Homes 4 Rent (AMH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +265. 6% versus AMH's +121. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMH or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
17β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately 343% more volatile than AMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 66% for American Homes 4 Rent — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMH or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prologis, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to 9. 3% for American Homes 4 Rent. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMH or PLD?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 24. 3% for American Homes 4 Rent — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 24. 2% for AMH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMH or PLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 49x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 84x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) trades at 41. 6x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for American Homes 4 Rent — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMH: 7. 9% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMH or PLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 6% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD).
09Is AMH or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
17), 3. 8% yield, +121. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMH: +121. 9%, PLD: +265. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMH and PLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMH is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.