REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMH vs PLD vs INVH vs EGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Residential
REIT - Industrial
AMH vs PLD vs INVH vs EGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Residential | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $11.77B | $132.16B | $17.37B | $10.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.87B | $8.74B | $2.79B | $737M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $467M | $3.21B | $583M | $293M |
| Gross Margin | 30.2% | 67.7% | 45.0% | 36.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | 47.0% | 31.2% | 40.3% |
| Forward P/E | 44.7x | 41.4x | 40.0x | 36.1x |
| Total Debt | $5.13B | $31.49B | $8.38B | $1.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $109M | $1.32B | $130M | $1M |
AMH vs PLD vs INVH vs EGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Homes 4 Re… (AMH) | 100 | 128.4 | +28.4% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
| Invitation Homes In… (INVH) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
| EastGroup Propertie… (EGP) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMH vs PLD vs INVH vs EGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 66.5%, current ratio 62.90x
- PEG 1.34 vs PLD's 3.83
- Beta 0.17, yield 3.8%, current ratio 62.90x
- PEG 1.34 vs 1.79
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +39.4% vs INVH's -13.6%
INVH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 4.0%
- 4.0% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%
EGP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 283.1% 10Y total return vs PLD's 259.1%
- 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2%
- 39.7% margin vs INVH's 20.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | PEG 1.34 vs 1.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.7% margin vs INVH's 20.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs PLD's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs INVH's -13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.5% ROA vs INVH's 3.1%, ROIC 4.3% vs 3.1% |
AMH vs PLD vs INVH vs EGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMH vs PLD vs INVH vs EGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EGP leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMH leads 1 • PLD leads 0 • INVH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLD and EGP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 11.9x EGP's $737M. EGP is the more profitable business, keeping 39.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INVH's 20.9%. On growth, EGP holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $8.7B | $2.8B | $737M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $973M | $6.7B | $1.6B | $517M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $467M | $3.2B | $583M | $293M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $875M | $5.2B | $1.1B | $418M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +67.7% | +45.0% | +36.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +47.0% | +31.2% | +40.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +36.7% | +20.9% | +39.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.9% | +59.3% | +40.7% | +56.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +8.7% | +8.8% | +10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -24.1% | -3.7% | +55.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AMH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.5x trailing earnings, AMH trades at a 34% valuation discount to EGP's 41.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMH offers better value at 0.82x vs EGP's 3.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.8B | $132.2B | $17.4B | $11.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.8B | $162.3B | $25.6B | $12.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.47x | 35.49x | 30.19x | 41.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.67x | 41.39x | 40.02x | 36.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | 3.28x | 1.35x | 3.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.56x | 23.20x | 17.22x | 25.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.31x | 16.11x | 6.37x | 15.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 2.32x | 1.86x | 3.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.78x | 26.90x | 18.03x | 27.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EGP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EGP delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for PLD. EGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INVH's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INVH scores 7/9 vs PLD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +5.6% | +6.1% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +3.3% | +3.1% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +3.8% | +3.1% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +4.8% | +4.1% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.54x | 0.88x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.0B | $30.2B | $8.3B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109M | $1.3B | $130M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $31.5B | $8.4B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.77x | 5.27x | 2.05x | 8.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGP five years ago would be worth $14,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,789 for INVH. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +39.4% total return vs INVH's -13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EGP at 8.8% vs INVH's -1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +11.1% | +5.6% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.3% | +39.4% | -13.6% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.5% | +20.8% | -5.1% | +28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.4% | +37.7% | -2.1% | +46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.9% | +259.1% | +81.2% | +283.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | +6.5% | -1.7% | +8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMH and EGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMH is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGP currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs INVH's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 0.73x | 0.27x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.07 | $145.44 | $35.25 | $204.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.21 | $103.02 | $24.25 | $159.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.0% | +97.8% | +82.2% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.8 | 58.4 | 71.5 | 62.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 3.1M | 5.8M | 337K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PLD and INVH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMH as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", INVH as "Hold", EGP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.2% upside for INVH (target: $32) vs 0.4% for EGP (target: $205). For income investors, INVH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs PLD's 2.63%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $144.43 | $32.22 | $204.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 42 | 33 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +2.6% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 11 | 9 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $3.74 | $1.16 | $5.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
EGP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AMH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
AMH vs PLD vs INVH vs EGP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP?
On trailing P/E, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the cheapest at 27.
5x versus EastGroup Properties, Inc. at 41. 9x. On forward P/E, EastGroup Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 36. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Homes 4 Rent wins at 1. 34x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 83x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP?
Over the past 5 years, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) delivered a total return of +46. 8%, compared to -2. 1% for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGP returned +283. 1% versus INVH's +81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
17β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately 343% more volatile than AMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 88% for Invitation Homes Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Invitation Homes Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 5% for EastGroup Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 21. 5% for Invitation Homes Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 24. 2% for AMH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 34x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 83x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) trades at 36. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for American Homes 4 Rent — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVH: 11. 2% to $32. 22.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 6% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD).
09Is AMH or PLD or INVH or EGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
17), 3. 8% yield, +116. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMH: +116. 9%, PLD: +259. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMH and PLD and INVH and EGP?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMH is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; INVH is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.