Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMKR vs TFII vs ASX vs ODFL vs SAIA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
Semiconductors
Trucking
Trucking
AMKR vs TFII vs ASX vs ODFL vs SAIA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Trucking | Semiconductors | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $17.91B | $11.36B | $72.90B | $41.28B | $11.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.07B | $8.65B | $666.14B | $5.50B | $3.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $436M | $339M | $47.13B | $1.02B | $255M |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 12.2% | 18.3% | 32.2% | 18.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 7.0% | 8.8% | 24.8% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 34.4x | 26.7x | 1.0x | 37.7x | 42.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.57B | $3.69B | $264.10B | $141M | $418M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.38B | $210M | $92.47B | $120M | $20M |
AMKR vs TFII vs ASX vs ODFL vs SAIA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amkor Technology, I… (AMKR) | 100 | 683.1 | +583.1% |
| TFI International I… (TFII) | 100 | 456.6 | +356.6% |
| ASE Technology Hold… (ASX) | 100 | 817.2 | +717.2% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
| Saia, Inc. (SAIA) | 100 | 414.0 | +314.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMKR vs TFII vs ASX vs ODFL vs SAIA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +312.0% vs ODFL's +28.0%
TFII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 31.1%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.7%
- Beta 1.30, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.03x
- 31.1% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5%
ASX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.13 vs AMKR's 24.73
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 42.3x), PEG 0.13 vs 3.29
ODFL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 1.44x
- 18.6% margin vs TFII's 3.9%
- 18.5% ROA vs TFII's 4.7%, ROIC 23.6% vs 9.7%
SAIA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 15.7% 10Y total return vs AMKR's 12.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.1% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 42.3x), PEG 0.13 vs 3.29 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs TFII's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs AMKR's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ODFL's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +312.0% vs ODFL's +28.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs TFII's 4.7%, ROIC 23.6% vs 9.7% |
AMKR vs TFII vs ASX vs ODFL vs SAIA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMKR vs TFII vs ASX vs ODFL vs SAIA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
TFII leads 1 • ASX leads 1 • AMKR leads 0 • SAIA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASX is the larger business by revenue, generating $666.1B annually — 204.8x SAIA's $3.3B. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TFII's 3.9%. On growth, TFII holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.1B | $8.6B | $666.1B | $5.5B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $1.3B | $127.9B | $1.7B | $602M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $436M | $339M | $47.1B | $1.0B | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $392M | $778M | -$6.2B | $955M | $261M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +12.2% | +18.3% | +32.2% | +18.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +7.0% | +8.8% | +24.8% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +3.9% | +7.1% | +18.6% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +9.0% | -0.9% | +17.4% | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.5% | +28.4% | +17.4% | -5.7% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +23.5% | +95.1% | -11.4% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TFII leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, TFII trades at a 53% valuation discount to ASX's 56.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TFII offers better value at 2.59x vs AMKR's 34.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.9B | $11.4B | $72.9B | $41.3B | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.1B | $14.8B | $78.4B | $41.3B | $12.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.18x | 26.58x | 56.57x | 41.01x | 47.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.36x | 26.72x | 1.04x | 37.69x | 42.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 34.68x | 2.59x | 7.16x | 3.66x | 3.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.31x | 9.18x | 20.66x | 23.93x | 20.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.67x | 1.03x | 3.52x | 7.51x | 3.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.98x | 4.32x | 6.19x | 9.64x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 93.77x | 11.55x | — | 43.22x | 438.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $10 for AMKR. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TFII's 1.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASX scores 6/9 vs TFII's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +12.8% | +13.4% | +24.0% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +4.7% | +5.5% | +18.5% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +9.7% | +7.6% | +23.6% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +12.3% | +8.9% | +27.1% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 1.38x | 0.71x | 0.03x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $187M | $3.5B | $171.6B | $21M | $398M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $210M | $92.5B | $120M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $3.7B | $264.1B | $141M | $418M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.39x | 3.44x | 10.27x | 4601.85x | 23.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASX five years ago would be worth $43,154 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,002 for ODFL. Over the past 12 months, AMKR leads with a +312.0% total return vs ODFL's +28.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASX at 69.7% vs ODFL's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.6% | +30.1% | +97.7% | +24.6% | +33.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +312.0% | +72.2% | +270.3% | +28.0% | +72.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +244.3% | +35.2% | +388.3% | +29.1% | +56.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +266.1% | +64.2% | +331.5% | +50.0% | +83.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1221.7% | +708.1% | +684.8% | +841.8% | +1567.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.0% | +10.6% | +69.7% | +8.9% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TFII and SAIA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TFII is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMKR's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ODFL's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.87x | 1.30x | 1.61x | 1.38x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.23 | $149.09 | $34.22 | $233.79 | $457.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.18 | $80.56 | $8.89 | $126.01 | $248.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +92.7% | +97.4% | +84.7% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 62.9 | 80.5 | 45.2 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 382K | 6.9M | 2.1M | 523K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TFII and ODFL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMKR as "Hold", TFII as "Buy", ASX as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold", SAIA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.1% upside for ODFL (target: $208) vs -7.6% for AMKR (target: $67). For income investors, TFII offers the higher dividend yield at 1.83% vs AMKR's 0.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.75 | $137.00 | — | $208.19 | $422.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 19 | 5 | 36 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +1.8% | +1.0% | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.33 | $2.53 | $10.46 | $1.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +0.1% |
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TFII leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AMKR vs TFII vs ASX vs ODFL vs SAIA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is the stronger pick with 31. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). TFI International Inc. (TFII) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (26. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TFI International Inc. (TFII) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA?
On trailing P/E, TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. at 56. 6x. On forward P/E, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. wins at 0. 13x versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 24. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA?
Over the past 5 years, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) delivered a total return of +331. 5%, compared to +50. 0% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAIA returned +1568% versus ASX's +684. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning AMKR is approximately 121% more volatile than TFII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 138% for TFI International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is pulling ahead at 31. 1% versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 27. 7% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Saia, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TFII leads at 7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus 3. 9% for TFI International Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus 6. 9% for TFII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ODFL leads at 32. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 13x versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 24. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Saia, Inc. — 41. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ODFL: 5. 1% to $208. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA?
In this comparison, TFII (1.
8% yield), ASX (1. 0% yield), ODFL (0. 6% yield), AMKR (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SAIA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMKR or TFII or ASX or ODFL or SAIA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +841. 8% 10Y return). Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +841. 8%, AMKR: +1222%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMKR and TFII and ASX and ODFL and SAIA?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMKR (Technology) and TFII (Industrials) and ASX (Technology) and ODFL (Industrials) and SAIA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TFII is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ASX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ODFL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SAIA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TFII, ASX, ODFL pay a dividend while AMKR, SAIA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.