Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AMLX logo
AMLX
BIIB logo
BIIB
IONS logo
IONS
ACAD logo
ACAD
RARE logo
RARE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMLX vs BIIB vs IONS vs ACAD vs RARE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMLX
Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.21B
5Y Perf.-37.1%
BIIB
Biogen Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$29.53B
5Y Perf.-11.5%
IONS
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.11B
5Y Perf.+130.4%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.61B
5Y Perf.-6.2%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.39B
5Y Perf.-65.2%

AMLX vs BIIB vs IONS vs ACAD vs RARE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMLX logoAMLX
BIIB logoBIIB
IONS logoIONS
ACAD logoACAD
RARE logoRARE
IndustryBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$1.21B$29.53B$12.11B$3.61B$2.39B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$9.86B$1.06B$1.10B$669M
Net Income (TTM)$-150M$1.37B$-327M$376M$-609M
Gross Margin69.8%98.3%91.5%83.6%
Operating Margin15.6%-33.3%7.4%-83.9%
Forward P/E13.7x54.2x
Total Debt$6M$6.95B$2.61B$52M$1.28B
Cash & Equiv.$227M$3.01B$372M$178M$434M

AMLX vs BIIB vs IONS vs ACAD vs RARELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMLX
BIIB
IONS
ACAD
RARE
StockJan 22Jun 26Return
Amylyx Pharmaceutic… (AMLX)10062.9-37.1%
Biogen Inc. (BIIB)10088.5-11.5%
Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS)100230.4+130.4%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10093.8-6.2%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10034.8-65.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMLX vs BIIB vs IONS vs ACAD vs RARE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BIIB and ACAD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AMLX and IONS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMLX
Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Income Pick

AMLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.40
  • +164.3% vs RARE's -38.0%
Best for: income & stability
BIIB
Biogen Inc.
The Defensive Pick

BIIB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
  • Beta 0.40, current ratio 2.68x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.40 vs RARE's 1.43
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
IONS
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IONS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 241.3% 10Y total return vs AMLX's -13.6%
  • 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Growth Play

ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
  • 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
  • 26.2% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 10.0% vs -132.2%
Best for: growth exposure
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIONS logoIONS33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
ValueBIIB logoBIIBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyBIIB logoBIIBBeta 0.40 vs RARE's 1.43
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMLX logoAMLX+164.3% vs RARE's -38.0%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 10.0% vs -132.2%

AMLX vs BIIB vs IONS vs ACAD vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
AMLXAmylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BIIBBiogen Inc.
FY 2025
MS Product Revenues
42.0%$4.0B
TYSABRI product
17.3%$1.7B
SPINRAZA
16.1%$1.5B
Fumarate
14.8%$1.4B
Interferon
9.8%$946M
IONSIonis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Commercial Member
52.1%$436M
Royalty
34.1%$286M
Product
13.8%$115M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M

AMLX vs BIIB vs IONS vs ACAD vs RARE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBIIBLAGGINGRARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IONS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BIIB and AMLX operate at a comparable scale, with $9.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMLX logoAMLXAmylyx Pharmaceut…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.IONS logoIONSIonis Pharmaceuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$9.9B$1.1B$1.1B$669M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$159M$2.4B$4.5B$96M-$536M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$150M$1.4B-$327M$376M-$609M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$121M$2.6B-$971M$212M-$487M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.8%+98.3%+91.5%+83.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.6%-33.3%+7.4%-83.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.9%-30.9%+34.3%-91.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.6%-91.8%+19.4%-72.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.9%+87.0%+9.7%-2.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%+31.1%+39.8%-81.8%-17.2%
IONS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BIIB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 59% valuation discount to BIIB's 22.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 25.1x.

MetricAMLX logoAMLXAmylyx Pharmaceut…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.IONS logoIONSIonis Pharmaceuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$29.5B$12.1B$3.6B$2.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$992M$33.5B$14.4B$3.5B$3.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.54x22.66x-30.79x9.21x-4.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.69x54.20x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.90x25.09x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.01x12.83x3.37x3.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.52x1.61x23.97x2.94x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.40x34.34x
BIIB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. AMLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAMLX logoAMLXAmylyx Pharmaceut…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.IONS logoIONSIonis Pharmaceuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-55.7%+7.5%-58.6%+35.6%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-50.7%+4.7%-10.1%+26.2%-45.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-132.2%+6.5%-12.8%+10.0%-89.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-64.5%+7.7%-14.1%+10.1%-46.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935364
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.38x5.35x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$221M$3.9B$2.2B-$126M$842M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$227M$3.0B$372M$178M$434M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$6.9B$2.6B$52M$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.91x-3.64x-14.49x
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,367 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, AMLX leads with a +164.3% total return vs RARE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 20.7% vs RARE's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMLX logoAMLXAmylyx Pharmaceut…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.IONS logoIONSIonis Pharmaceuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.8%+12.5%-8.0%-19.3%+3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+164.3%+51.2%+105.7%-3.0%-38.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-41.2%-36.2%+76.0%-14.3%-52.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.3%-50.7%+93.9%-22.6%-76.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-13.6%-18.1%+241.3%-44.6%-59.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-16.2%-13.9%+20.7%-5.0%-22.0%
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 57.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMLX logoAMLXAmylyx Pharmaceut…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.IONS logoIONSIonis Pharmaceuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x0.40x0.42x1.10x1.43x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.61$205.97$86.74$27.81$42.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.80$121.05$34.78$19.69$18.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.4%+97.1%+84.5%+75.8%+57.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.257.546.247.953.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M1.1M1.6M1.4M1.5M
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AMLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AMLX as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.6% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 9.1% for BIIB (target: $218).

MetricAMLX logoAMLXAmylyx Pharmaceut…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.IONS logoIONSIonis Pharmaceuti…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.50$218.16$107.27$34.78$48.36
# AnalystsCovering analysts1148323733
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises201
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
AMLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

IONS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BIIB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallBiogen Inc. (BIIB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMLX vs BIIB vs IONS vs ACAD vs RARE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (54. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE?

On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Biogen Inc. at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, Biogen Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE?

Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(IONS) delivered a total return of +93. 9%, compared to -76. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +241. 3% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.

(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning RARE is approximately 254% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc.

(BIIB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 54. 2x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 98. 6% to $48. 36.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AMLX or BIIB or IONS or ACAD or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(IONS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), +241. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONS: +241. 3%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMLX and BIIB and IONS and ACAD and RARE?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.