Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $12.20B | $29.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.06B | $9.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-150M | $-327M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | 98.3% | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -33.3% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2.61B | $6.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $372M | $3.01B |
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amylyx Pharmaceutic… (AMLX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 86.7 | -13.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMLX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +156.6% vs BIIB's +50.3%
IONS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 243.8% 10Y total return vs AMLX's -17.4%
- 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
BIIB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.39
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 2.68x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs IONS's -30.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AMLX's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.6% vs BIIB's +50.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -132.2% |
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIIB leads in 3 of 6 categories
IONS leads 1 • AMLX leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IONS and BIIB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB and AMLX operate at a comparable scale, with $9.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. BIIB is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IONS's -30.9%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | $4.5B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$150M | -$327M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | -$971M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +98.3% | +69.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -33.3% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -30.9% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -91.8% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +87.0% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +39.8% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $12.2B | $29.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $936M | $14.4B | $33.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.09x | -31.02x | 22.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.92x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 24.15x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB delivers a 7.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-59 for IONS. AMLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIIB scores 5/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | -58.6% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.7% | -10.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -132.2% | -12.8% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.5% | -14.1% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 5.35x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$221M | $2.2B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $372M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2.6B | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.64x | 6.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,462 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,041 for BIIB. Over the past 12 months, AMLX leads with a +156.6% total return vs BIIB's +50.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 21.0% vs AMLX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | -7.3% | +12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.6% | +104.0% | +50.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | +77.3% | -36.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +94.6% | -49.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | +243.8% | -18.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.6% | +21.0% | -13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMLX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs AMLX's 74.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.41x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.61 | $86.74 | $205.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.80 | $34.78 | $121.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.8% | +85.1% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 44.2 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.6M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
AMLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMLX as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.1% upside for AMLX (target: $25) vs 6.2% for BIIB (target: $212).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.50 | $107.27 | $212.26 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 32 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BIIB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IONS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). Biogen Inc. (BIIB) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AMLX or IONS or BIIB?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +94. 6%, compared to -49. 6% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +243. 8% versus BIIB's -18. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AMLX or IONS or BIIB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning AMLX is approximately 280% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AMLX or IONS or BIIB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 65. 5% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IONS leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AMLX or IONS or BIIB?
Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -40. 4% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus -40. 5% for IONS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMLX: 76.
1% to $24. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — AMLX or IONS or BIIB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +243. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONS: +243. 8%, AMLX: -17. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AMLX and IONS and BIIB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.