Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMS vs ARAY vs NNOX vs BLCO vs IART

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMS
American Shared Hospital Services

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$13M
5Y Perf.-13.5%
ARAY
Accuray Incorporated

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$35M
5Y Perf.-85.9%
NNOX
Nano-X Imaging Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$115M
5Y Perf.-82.8%
BLCO
Bausch + Lomb Corporation

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • CA
Market Cap$5.67B
5Y Perf.-6.5%
IART
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.06B
5Y Perf.-78.4%

AMS vs ARAY vs NNOX vs BLCO vs IART — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMS logoAMS
ARAY logoARAY
NNOX logoNNOX
BLCO logoBLCO
IART logoIART
IndustryMedical - Care FacilitiesMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$13M$35M$115M$5.67B$1.06B
Revenue (TTM)$29M$429M$12M$5.21B$1.64B
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-46M$-56M$-219M$-496M
Gross Margin25.0%26.8%-98.8%55.9%39.6%
Operating Margin-12.3%-5.1%-469.7%5.9%5.8%
Forward P/E6.1x20.1x5.8x
Total Debt$23M$176M$7M$5.37B$2.03B
Cash & Equiv.$11M$57M$39M$383M$235M

AMS vs ARAY vs NNOX vs BLCO vs IARTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMS
ARAY
NNOX
BLCO
IART
StockMay 22May 26Return
American Shared Hos… (AMS)10086.5-13.5%
Accuray Incorporated (ARAY)10014.1-85.9%
Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX)10017.2-82.8%
Bausch + Lomb Corpo… (BLCO)10093.5-6.5%
Integra LifeScience… (IART)10021.6-78.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMS vs ARAY vs NNOX vs BLCO vs IART

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BLCO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. American Shared Hospital Services is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. IART also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMS
American Shared Hospital Services
The Income Pick

AMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.02
  • Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth 245.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
  • -4.7% 10Y total return vs BLCO's -20.5%
  • 32.9% revenue growth vs IART's 1.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ARAY
Accuray Incorporated
The Healthcare Pick

ARAY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
NNOX
Nano-X Imaging Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

NNOX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.86, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 5.63x
  • Beta 1.86, current ratio 5.63x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BLCO
Bausch + Lomb Corporation
The Quality Compounder

BLCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.

  • -4.2% margin vs NNOX's -452.8%
  • Beta 1.39 vs ARAY's 2.42, lower leverage
  • +39.5% vs ARAY's -78.4%
  • -1.6% ROA vs NNOX's -31.6%, ROIC 1.2% vs -27.9%
Best for: quality and stability
IART
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
The Value Play

IART ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (5.8x vs 20.1x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMS logoAMS32.9% revenue growth vs IART's 1.5%
ValueIART logoIARTLower P/E (5.8x vs 20.1x)
Quality / MarginsBLCO logoBLCO-4.2% margin vs NNOX's -452.8%
Stability / SafetyBLCO logoBLCOBeta 1.39 vs ARAY's 2.42, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BLCO logoBLCO+39.5% vs ARAY's -78.4%
Efficiency (ROA)BLCO logoBLCO-1.6% ROA vs NNOX's -31.6%, ROIC 1.2% vs -27.9%

AMS vs ARAY vs NNOX vs BLCO vs IART — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMSAmerican Shared Hospital Services
FY 2024
Rental Income from Medical Services
55.1%$16M
Patient Income
44.3%$13M
Equipment Sales
0.5%$155,000
ARAYAccuray Incorporated
FY 2025
Product
51.8%$238M
Service
48.2%$221M
NNOXNano-X Imaging Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

BLCOBausch + Lomb Corporation
FY 2025
Device Products
37.7%$1.9B
Over the Counter Products
36.0%$1.8B
Pharmaceutical Products
21.2%$1.1B
Branded and Other Generic Products
4.8%$243M
Other Revenues
0.4%$21M
IARTIntegra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
FY 2025
Codman Specialty Surgical
73.4%$1.2B
Tissue Technologies
26.6%$435M

AMS vs ARAY vs NNOX vs BLCO vs IART — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBLCOLAGGINGIART

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BLCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 423.3x NNOX's $12M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.2% (BLCO) to -4.5% (NNOX). On growth, NNOX holds the edge at +13.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMS logoAMSAmerican Shared H…ARAY logoARAYAccuray Incorpora…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…BLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…IART logoIARTIntegra LifeScien…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$29M$429M$12M$5.2B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M-$15M-$46M$724M$209M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$46M-$56M-$219M-$496M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M-$28M-$47M$4M-$10M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.0%+26.8%-98.8%+55.9%+39.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.3%-5.1%-4.7%+5.9%+5.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.6%-10.8%-4.5%-4.2%-30.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-34.7%-6.5%-3.8%+0.1%-0.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.5%-7.4%+13.7%+9.4%+2.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-56.7%-6.1%+8.7%+66.7%+81.8%
BLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARAY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AMS's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BLCO's 17.5x.

MetricAMS logoAMSAmerican Shared H…ARAY logoARAYAccuray Incorpora…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…BLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…IART logoIARTIntegra LifeScien…
Market CapShares × price$13M$35M$115M$5.7B$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$25M$154M$83M$10.7B$2.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS6.09x-18.91x-1.93x-15.59x-2.01x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.10x5.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.51x10.99x17.50x13.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.46x0.08x10.20x1.11x0.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.45x0.37x0.55x0.86x1.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
ARAY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ARAY and NNOX and BLCO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

BLCO delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-77 for ARAY. NNOX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARAY's 2.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARAY scores 6/9 vs BLCO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAMS logoAMSAmerican Shared H…ARAY logoARAYAccuray Incorpora…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…BLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…IART logoIARTIntegra LifeScien…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-7.9%-77.5%-35.5%-3.4%-47.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.8%-10.1%-31.6%-1.6%-13.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.8%+3.0%-27.9%+1.2%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.4%+2.8%-28.4%+1.6%+2.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956435
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.77x2.17x0.04x0.82x1.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$12M$119M-$32M$5.0B$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$57M$39M$383M$235M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$23M$176M$7M$5.4B$2.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.35x-1.86x-379.29x0.71x-10.36x
Evenly matched — ARAY and NNOX and BLCO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BLCO five years ago would be worth $7,950 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $605 for NNOX. Over the past 12 months, BLCO leads with a +39.5% total return vs ARAY's -78.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLCO at -4.5% vs ARAY's -56.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMS logoAMSAmerican Shared H…ARAY logoARAYAccuray Incorpora…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…BLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…IART logoIARTIntegra LifeScien…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.3%-65.5%-37.8%-4.1%+12.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.4%-78.4%-64.4%+39.5%+6.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.0%-91.8%-89.2%-13.0%-73.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-41.1%-93.9%-93.9%-20.5%-81.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-4.7%-94.5%-96.1%-20.5%-63.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.4%-56.6%-52.4%-4.5%-35.4%
BLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMS and BLCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMS is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARAY's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLCO currently trades 84.0% from its 52-week high vs ARAY's 14.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMS logoAMSAmerican Shared H…ARAY logoARAYAccuray Incorpora…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…BLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…IART logoIARTIntegra LifeScien…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.02x2.42x1.86x1.39x2.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.11$2.10$5.86$18.92$16.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.25$0.28$1.66$10.85$8.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.6%+14.0%+30.0%+84.0%+82.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.858.438.546.975.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded138K1.4M1.4M412K858K
Evenly matched — AMS and BLCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NNOX as "Buy", BLCO as "Hold", IART as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 922.7% upside for NNOX (target: $18) vs -11.5% for IART (target: $12).

MetricAMS logoAMSAmerican Shared H…ARAY logoARAYAccuray Incorpora…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…BLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…IART logoIARTIntegra LifeScien…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$19.00$12.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts51626
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BLCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ARAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallBausch + Lomb Corporation (BLCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMS vs ARAY vs NNOX vs BLCO vs IART: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART a better buy right now?

For growth investors, American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is the stronger pick with 32.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART). American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART?

On forward P/E, Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 5.

8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART?

Over the past 5 years, Bausch + Lomb Corporation (BLCO) delivered a total return of -20.

5%, compared to -93. 9% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMS returned -4. 7% versus NNOX's -96. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

02β versus Accuray Incorporated's 2. 42β — meaning ARAY is approximately -15516% more volatile than AMS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Accuray Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is pulling ahead at 32.

9% versus 1. 5% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Shared Hospital Services grew EPS 245. 9% year-over-year, compared to -73. 6% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNOX leads at 105. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART?

American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

7% net margin versus -474. 3% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IART leads at 4. 2% versus -502. 9% for NNOX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLCO leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART) trades at 5.

8x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Bausch + Lomb Corporation — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNOX: 922. 7% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AMS or ARAY or NNOX or BLCO or IART better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

02)). Accuray Incorporated (ARAY) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMS: -4. 7%, ARAY: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMS and ARAY and NNOX and BLCO and IART?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNOX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IART is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARAY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NNOX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLCO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IART

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMS and ARAY and NNOX and BLCO and IART on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMS: 2.5% · ARAY: -7.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.