Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $991M | $2.41B | $4.41B | $706M | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $1.04B | $1.89B | $310M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $135M | $392M | $69M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 64.2% | 67.4% | 69.1% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 17.9% | 25.7% | 26.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 11.4x | 11.3x | 9.7x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $490M | $1.30B | $117M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $181M | $271M | $52M | $343.34B |
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| First Busey Corpora… (BUSE) | 100 | 151.4 | +51.4% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 231.0 | +131.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +44.5% vs IBCP's +16.5%
BUSE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and dividends.
- 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
- 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.81 vs IBCP's 1.83
- Lower P/E (11.3x vs 13.1x)
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.68, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.68 vs FULT's 0.94, lower leverage
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 186.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AMTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AMTB's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AMTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs FULT's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs IBCP's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AMTB's 0.5% |
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • AMTB leads 0 • BUSE leads 0 • FULT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMTB's 11.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $1.0B | $1.9B | $310M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $220M | $529M | $89M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $135M | $392M | $69M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $172M | $267M | $70M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +64.2% | +67.4% | +69.1% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +17.9% | +25.7% | +26.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +13.0% | +20.7% | +22.1% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +16.5% | +14.1% | +22.6% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +28.6% | +47.2% | +2.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 45% valuation discount to BUSE's 19.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.79x vs IBCP's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $2.4B | $4.4B | $706M | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $2.7B | $5.4B | $771M | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | 19.20x | 11.01x | 10.49x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 11.44x | 11.30x | 9.66x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.79x | 1.99x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | 13.30x | 10.26x | 9.48x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 2.31x | 2.33x | 2.24x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.02x | 1.20x | 1.42x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 13.89x | 15.50x | 10.07x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for BUSE. BUSE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +5.7% | +11.6% | +14.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +1.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +5.8% | +7.5% | +10.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.3% | +9.5% | +2.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.20x | 0.37x | 0.23x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $309M | $1.0B | $65M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $181M | $271M | $52M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $490M | $1.3B | $117M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.58x | 0.84x | 0.91x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,272 for AMTB. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs IBCP's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +20.3% | +18.6% | +8.3% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +30.1% | +38.2% | +16.5% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +52.1% | +98.3% | +112.6% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +33.8% | +70.1% | +85.3% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +74.2% | +112.4% | +186.7% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +15.0% | +25.6% | +28.6% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BUSE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUSE currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.74x | 0.94x | 0.68x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $29.10 | $23.66 | $39.16 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $21.63 | $16.60 | $29.63 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +97.0% | +96.8% | +87.6% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 57.0 | 58.3 | 49.3 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 558K | 1.7M | 139K | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BUSE and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", BUSE as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, BUSE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.62% vs AMTB's 1.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $29.00 | $23.50 | $38.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +3.6% | +3.4% | +3.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.02 | $0.77 | $1.03 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +2.9% | +1.5% | +1.8% | +3.8% |
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger pick with 57.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus First Busey Corporation at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +22. 7% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus AMTB's +40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning FULT is approximately 39% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is pulling ahead at 57.
6% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -25. 8% for First Busey Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 8. 0% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 10. 1% for AMTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 10. 8% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Busey Corporation (BUSE) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).
09Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and BUSE and FULT and IBCP and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BUSE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.