Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMTD vs IQ vs NFLX vs FUTU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Financial - Capital Markets
AMTD vs IQ vs NFLX vs FUTU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Entertainment | Entertainment | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $8M | $1.17B | $370.67B | $51.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $27.11B | $45.18B | $13.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $-390M | $10.98B | $7.91B |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 21.9% | 48.5% | 82.0% |
| Operating Margin | 48.2% | 1.7% | 29.5% | 48.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 4.9x | 24.5x | 1.5x |
| Total Debt | $283M | $14.19B | $14.46B | $8.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $3.53B | $9.03B | $11.69B |
AMTD vs IQ vs NFLX vs FUTU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 7.2 | -92.8% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 208.4 | +108.4% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 904.3 | +804.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTD vs IQ vs NFLX vs FUTU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 36.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 10.62x
- Beta 0.05, yield 36.4%, current ratio 10.62x
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 24.5x)
IQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 19.8% ROA vs IQ's -0.9%, ROIC 29.8% vs 5.8%
FUTU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.7%
- PEG 0.02 vs NFLX's 0.74
- 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
- +42.2% vs IQ's -37.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 24.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.4% margin vs IQ's -1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs FUTU's 2.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 36.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.2% vs IQ's -37.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs IQ's -0.9%, ROIC 29.8% vs 5.8% |
AMTD vs IQ vs NFLX vs FUTU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTD vs IQ vs NFLX vs FUTU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUTU leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMTD leads 1 • NFLX leads 1 • IQ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 835.7x AMTD's $54M. AMTD is the more profitable business, keeping 94.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQ's -1.4%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $27.1B | $45.2B | $13.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $263M | $6.3B | $30.1B | $10.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | -$390M | $11.0B | $7.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $466M | $9.5B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +21.9% | +48.5% | +82.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +1.7% | +29.5% | +48.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +94.4% | -1.4% | +24.3% | +40.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +1.7% | +20.9% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.8% | +17.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.3% | -2.1% | +31.1% | +112.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMTD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUTU offers better value at 0.30x vs NFLX's 1.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $1.2B | $370.7B | $51.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $228M | $2.7B | $376.1B | $51.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.25x | 10.60x | 34.58x | 29.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.88x | 24.52x | 1.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.05x | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.94x | 10.23x | 12.50x | 58.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.27x | 8.20x | 29.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.59x | 14.19x | 5.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.46x | 4.09x | 39.18x | 13.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for IQ. AMTD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs AMTD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | -2.9% | +41.3% | +26.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | -0.9% | +19.8% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +5.8% | +29.8% | +14.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +7.8% | +30.5% | +25.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 1.06x | 0.54x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $221M | $10.7B | $5.4B | -$3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $3.5B | $9.0B | $11.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $283M | $14.2B | $14.5B | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.18x | 0.77x | 17.33x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,974 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $254 for AMTD. Over the past 12 months, FUTU leads with a +42.2% total return vs IQ's -37.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 53.5% vs IQ's -41.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -40.9% | -3.9% | -17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | -37.5% | -23.6% | +42.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.6% | -79.7% | +164.1% | +261.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -90.9% | +79.7% | +24.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | -92.3% | +866.6% | +873.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.2% | -41.3% | +38.2% | +53.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMTD and FUTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMTD is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUTU's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUTU currently trades 71.4% from its 52-week high vs IQ's 42.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 1.40x | 0.35x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.65 | $2.84 | $134.12 | $202.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $1.07 | $75.01 | $100.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.2% | +42.3% | +65.2% | +71.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 43.8 | 35.3 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 10.7M | 42.9M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IQ as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", FUTU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.0% upside for IQ (target: $2) vs 32.1% for NFLX (target: $116). AMTD is the only dividend payer here at 36.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.16 | $115.59 | $222.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 99 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +36.4% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% |
FUTU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AMTD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMTD vs IQ vs NFLX vs FUTU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU?
On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 6x. On forward P/E, Futu Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Futu Holdings Limited wins at 0. 02x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +79. 7%, compared to -97. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +873. 5% versus IQ's -92. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Futu Holdings Limited's 2. 11β — meaning FUTU is approximately 3868% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU?
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.
4% net margin versus 2. 6% for iQIYI, Inc. — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus 6. 2% for IQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUTU leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Netflix, Inc. — 23. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQ: 80. 0% to $2. 16.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU?
In this comparison, AMTD (36.
4% yield) pays a dividend. IQ, NFLX, FUTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMTD or IQ or NFLX or FUTU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05), 36. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMTD: -91. 4%, IQ: -92. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTD and IQ and NFLX and FUTU?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMTD (Financial Services) and IQ (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and FUTU (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock; IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock. AMTD pays a dividend while IQ, NFLX, FUTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.