Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
Computer Hardware
Specialty Retail
AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Computer Hardware | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $763K | $55M | $45M | $790M | $6.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $1.21B | $70M | $561M | $2.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-37M | $4M | $-127M | $285M |
| Gross Margin | 87.0% | 31.2% | 48.8% | 43.7% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | -458.8% | -1.3% | 6.0% | -10.9% | 14.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.4x | 78.7x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $432K | $455M | $9M | $32M | $742M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $156K | $3M | $17M | $70M | $1.40B |
AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 143.8 | +43.8% |
| NetSol Technologies… (NTWK) | 100 | 159.1 | +59.1% |
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
| Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) | 100 | 137.7 | +37.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMZE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SPWH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NTWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
- Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 316.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
- -44.8% 10Y total return vs ETSY's 6.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 2.35x
Among these 5 stocks, SSYS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ETSY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 9.9% margin vs AMZE's -5.6%
- 10.6% ROA vs AMZE's -12.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% revenue growth vs AMZE's -83.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 18.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs AMZE's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs AMZE's 2.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.8% vs AMZE's -98.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.6% ROA vs AMZE's -12.7% |
AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ETSY leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPWH leads 1 • NTWK leads 1 • AMZE leads 0 • SSYS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETSY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 1275.5x AMZE's $2M. ETSY is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMZE's -5.6%. On growth, AMZE holds the edge at +18.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $1.2B | $70M | $561M | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $24M | $5M | -$19M | $508M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$37M | $4M | -$127M | $285M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$55M | -$1M | -$3M | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.0% | +31.2% | +48.8% | +43.7% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | -1.3% | +6.0% | -10.9% | +14.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | -3.1% | +5.1% | -22.7% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | -4.5% | -1.5% | -0.6% | +23.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +1.8% | +21.1% | -2.2% | +3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.1% | -12.5% | +120.0% | -75.7% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, NTWK trades at a 67% valuation discount to ETSY's 46.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NTWK's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPWH's 22.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $762,878 | $55M | $45M | $790M | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $507M | $37M | $752M | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.70x | -1.64x | 15.40x | -5.44x | 46.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 78.72x | 18.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.60x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.79x | 7.51x | — | 11.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 0.05x | 0.69x | 1.38x | 2.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 0.23x | 1.05x | 0.83x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.80x | — | — | 9.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTWK delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SPWH. SSYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPWH's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTWK scores 6/9 vs SSYS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.6% | -17.9% | +8.5% | -15.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.7% | -3.9% | +5.7% | -11.9% | +10.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.8% | -1.9% | +8.5% | -8.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.6% | -3.2% | +8.4% | -9.4% | +22.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 1.93x | 0.22x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $276,458 | $452M | -$8M | -$38M | -$653M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $155,647 | $3M | $17M | $70M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $432,105 | $455M | $9M | $32M | $742M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.84x | -1.26x | 13.34x | -16.69x | 27.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTWK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTWK five years ago would be worth $9,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $101 for AMZE. Over the past 12 months, NTWK leads with a +61.8% total return vs AMZE's -98.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTWK at 16.1% vs AMZE's -78.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -71.1% | -2.1% | +32.8% | +2.7% | +13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.9% | -14.9% | +61.8% | -4.6% | +44.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -77.0% | +56.5% | -35.5% | -30.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -91.9% | -9.2% | -52.7% | -58.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -87.2% | -44.8% | -56.1% | +685.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.4% | -38.7% | +16.1% | -13.6% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTWK and ETSY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTWK is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZE's 2.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETSY currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs AMZE's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.98x | 1.80x | 0.94x | 1.79x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.76 | $4.33 | $5.75 | $12.81 | $76.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.11 | $1.08 | $2.34 | $7.34 | $44.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.0% | +33.0% | +67.0% | +72.2% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.6 | 42.0 | 51.8 | 59.4 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 829K | 27K | 797K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSYS as "Buy", ETSY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.9% upside for SSYS (target: $14) vs 7.8% for ETSY (target: $70).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $13.50 | $70.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 36 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +3.3% | +0.3% | +12.6% |
ETSY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the stronger pick with 7. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -83. 6% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?
On trailing P/E, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Etsy, Inc. at 46. 7x. On forward P/E, Etsy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?
Over the past 5 years, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) delivered a total return of -9. 2%, compared to -99. 0% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETSY returned +685. 6% versus AMZE's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Amaze Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 98β — meaning AMZE is approximately 218% more volatile than NTWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is pulling ahead at 7. 6% versus -83. 6% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NetSol Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 316. 7% year-over-year, compared to -40. 9% for Etsy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTWK leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?
Etsy, Inc.
(ETSY) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 7% net margin versus -842. 3% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETSY leads at 12. 8% versus -1044. 9% for AMZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETSY leads at 71. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Etsy, Inc.
(ETSY) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 78. 7x for Stratasys Ltd. — 59. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSYS: 45. 9% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Etsy, Inc.
(ETSY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), +685. 6% 10Y return). Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE) carries a higher beta of 2. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETSY: +685. 6%, AMZE: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMZE and SPWH and NTWK and SSYS and ETSY?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMZE (Technology) and SPWH (Consumer Cyclical) and NTWK (Technology) and SSYS (Technology) and ETSY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.