Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMZE
Amaze Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$763K
5Y Perf.-99.0%
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$55M
5Y Perf.+43.8%
NTWK
NetSol Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$45M
5Y Perf.+59.1%
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$790M
5Y Perf.-5.5%
ETSY
Etsy, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.17B
5Y Perf.+37.7%

AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMZE logoAMZE
SPWH logoSPWH
NTWK logoNTWK
SSYS logoSSYS
ETSY logoETSY
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSpecialty RetailSoftware - ApplicationComputer HardwareSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$763K$55M$45M$790M$6.17B
Revenue (TTM)$2M$1.21B$70M$561M$2.86B
Net Income (TTM)$-13M$-37M$4M$-127M$285M
Gross Margin87.0%31.2%48.8%43.7%72.0%
Operating Margin-458.8%-1.3%6.0%-10.9%14.3%
Forward P/E15.4x78.7x18.8x
Total Debt$432K$455M$9M$32M$742M
Cash & Equiv.$156K$3M$17M$70M$1.40B

AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMZE
SPWH
NTWK
SSYS
ETSY
StockMar 25May 26Return
Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE)1001.0-99.0%
Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH)100143.8+43.8%
NetSol Technologies… (NTWK)100159.1+59.1%
Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS)10094.5-5.5%
Etsy, Inc. (ETSY)100137.7+37.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NTWK leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Etsy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMZE
Amaze Holdings, Inc.
The Technology Pick

AMZE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: technology exposure
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

SPWH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
NTWK
NetSol Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

NTWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
  • Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 316.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
  • -44.8% 10Y total return vs ETSY's 6.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 2.35x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SSYS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
ETSY
Etsy, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

ETSY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 9.9% margin vs AMZE's -5.6%
  • 10.6% ROA vs AMZE's -12.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTWK logoNTWK7.6% revenue growth vs AMZE's -83.6%
ValueNTWK logoNTWKLower P/E (15.4x vs 18.8x)
Quality / MarginsETSY logoETSY9.9% margin vs AMZE's -5.6%
Stability / SafetyNTWK logoNTWKBeta 0.94 vs AMZE's 2.98, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NTWK logoNTWK+61.8% vs AMZE's -98.9%
Efficiency (ROA)ETSY logoETSY10.6% ROA vs AMZE's -12.7%

AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMZEAmaze Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Wholesale Revenue
100.0%$45,546
SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NTWKNetSol Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Support
49.8%$33M
Service
49.3%$33M
License
0.9%$598,633
SSYSStratasys Ltd.
FY 2025
Product
69.0%$380M
Services Member
31.0%$171M
ETSYEtsy, Inc.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
69.6%$2.0B
Services Revenue
30.4%$876M

AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLETSYLAGGINGSSYS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ETSY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 1275.5x AMZE's $2M. ETSY is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMZE's -5.6%. On growth, AMZE holds the edge at +18.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMZE logoAMZEAmaze Holdings, I…SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…NTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.ETSY logoETSYEtsy, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2M$1.2B$70M$561M$2.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M$24M$5M-$19M$508M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$13M-$37M$4M-$127M$285M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M-$55M-$1M-$3M$673M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.0%+31.2%+48.8%+43.7%+72.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.6%-1.3%+6.0%-10.9%+14.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.6%-3.1%+5.1%-22.7%+9.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.6%-4.5%-1.5%-0.6%+23.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.8%+1.8%+21.1%-2.2%+3.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-36.1%-12.5%+120.0%-75.7%+2.2%
ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.4x trailing earnings, NTWK trades at a 67% valuation discount to ETSY's 46.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NTWK's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPWH's 22.8x.

MetricAMZE logoAMZEAmaze Holdings, I…SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…NTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.ETSY logoETSYEtsy, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$762,878$55M$45M$790M$6.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1M$507M$37M$752M$5.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.70x-1.64x15.40x-5.44x46.74x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.78.72x18.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.60x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.79x7.51x11.73x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.55x0.05x0.69x1.38x2.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.29x0.23x1.05x0.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF2.80x9.65x
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

NTWK delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SPWH. SSYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPWH's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTWK scores 6/9 vs SSYS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAMZE logoAMZEAmaze Holdings, I…SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…NTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.ETSY logoETSYEtsy, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-17.6%-17.9%+8.5%-15.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-12.7%-3.9%+5.7%-11.9%+10.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.8%-1.9%+8.5%-8.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-9.6%-3.2%+8.4%-9.4%+22.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955645
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x1.93x0.22x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$276,458$452M-$8M-$38M-$653M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$155,647$3M$17M$70M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$432,105$455M$9M$32M$742M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.84x-1.26x13.34x-16.69x27.47x
ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTWK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTWK five years ago would be worth $9,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $101 for AMZE. Over the past 12 months, NTWK leads with a +61.8% total return vs AMZE's -98.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTWK at 16.1% vs AMZE's -78.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMZE logoAMZEAmaze Holdings, I…SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…NTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.ETSY logoETSYEtsy, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-71.1%-2.1%+32.8%+2.7%+13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-98.9%-14.9%+61.8%-4.6%+44.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%-77.0%+56.5%-35.5%-30.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%-91.9%-9.2%-52.7%-58.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%-87.2%-44.8%-56.1%+685.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-78.4%-38.7%+16.1%-13.6%-11.2%
NTWK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NTWK and ETSY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NTWK is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZE's 2.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETSY currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs AMZE's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMZE logoAMZEAmaze Holdings, I…SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…NTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.ETSY logoETSYEtsy, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.98x1.80x0.94x1.79x1.22x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.76$4.33$5.75$12.81$76.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.11$1.08$2.34$7.34$44.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.0%+33.0%+67.0%+72.2%+84.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.642.051.859.455.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.6M829K27K797K2.8M
Evenly matched — NTWK and ETSY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SSYS as "Buy", ETSY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.9% upside for SSYS (target: $14) vs 7.8% for ETSY (target: $70).

MetricAMZE logoAMZEAmaze Holdings, I…SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…NTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.ETSY logoETSYEtsy, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$70.07
# AnalystsCovering analysts3645
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.6%+3.3%+0.3%+12.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ETSY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallEtsy, Inc. (ETSY)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMZE vs SPWH vs NTWK vs SSYS vs ETSY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is the stronger pick with 7. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -83. 6% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?

On trailing P/E, NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Etsy, Inc. at 46. 7x. On forward P/E, Etsy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?

Over the past 5 years, NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) delivered a total return of -9. 2%, compared to -99. 0% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETSY returned +685. 6% versus AMZE's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Amaze Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 98β — meaning AMZE is approximately 218% more volatile than NTWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is pulling ahead at 7. 6% versus -83. 6% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NetSol Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 316. 7% year-over-year, compared to -40. 9% for Etsy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTWK leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?

Etsy, Inc.

(ETSY) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 7% net margin versus -842. 3% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETSY leads at 12. 8% versus -1044. 9% for AMZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETSY leads at 71. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Etsy, Inc.

(ETSY) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 78. 7x for Stratasys Ltd. — 59. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSYS: 45. 9% to $13. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AMZE or SPWH or NTWK or SSYS or ETSY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Etsy, Inc.

(ETSY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), +685. 6% 10Y return). Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE) carries a higher beta of 2. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETSY: +685. 6%, AMZE: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMZE and SPWH and NTWK and SSYS and ETSY?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMZE (Technology) and SPWH (Consumer Cyclical) and NTWK (Technology) and SSYS (Technology) and ETSY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMZE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 942%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPWH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTWK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SSYS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ETSY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMZE and SPWH and NTWK and SSYS and ETSY on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMZE: 1884.3% · SPWH: 1.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.