Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ANGH vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
ANGH vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $24M | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | -30.8% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | -79.6% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $35.93B |
ANGH vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anghami Inc. (ANGH) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 222.7 | +122.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANGH vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANGH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.72
- Rev growth 88.7%, EPS growth -266.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 21.0%, current ratio 0.60x
AAPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs ANGH's -96.2%
- 27.2% margin vs ANGH's -81.4%
- 0.4% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 88.7% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.2% margin vs ANGH's -81.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs AAPL's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.0% vs ANGH's -28.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs ANGH's -6.3%, ROIC 67.4% vs -254.5% |
ANGH vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANGH vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL and ANGH operate at a comparable scale, with $451.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ANGH's -81.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$777,324 | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -30.8% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.6% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -81.4% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -60.7% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ANGH leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.33x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-7 for ANGH. ANGH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs ANGH's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.0% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.3% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -744.75x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAPL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $368 for ANGH. Over the past 12 months, AAPL leads with a +47.0% total return vs ANGH's -28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 18.7% vs ANGH's -31.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.4% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.7% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.4% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ANGH and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ANGH is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs ANGH's 51.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.05 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.25 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.8% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
AAPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% |
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ANGH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ANGH vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANGH or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Anghami Inc.
(ANGH) is the stronger pick with 88. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Apple Inc. (AAPL) offers the better valuation at 38. 5x trailing P/E (33. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apple Inc. (AAPL) a "Buy" — based on 110 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ANGH or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -96. 3% for Anghami Inc. (ANGH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus ANGH's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ANGH or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anghami Inc.
(ANGH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Apple Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning AAPL is approximately 36% more volatile than ANGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Anghami Inc. (ANGH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ANGH or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Anghami Inc.
(ANGH) is pulling ahead at 88. 7% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apple Inc. grew EPS 22. 7% year-over-year, compared to -266. 7% for Anghami Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANGH leads at 30. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ANGH or AAPL?
Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -81. 4% for Anghami Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus -79. 6% for ANGH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ANGH or AAPL?
In this comparison, AAPL (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. ANGH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ANGH or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1174% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1174%, ANGH: -96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ANGH and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANGH (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANGH is a small-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare AAPL vs MSFT
MSFT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to AAPL.
Compare ANGH vs SPOT
SPOT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ANGH.
Expand With SPOT + GOOGL
SPOT and GOOGL are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.