Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ANNX vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ANNX vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $624M | $5.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-207M | $-464M |
| Total Debt | $29M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $714M |
ANNX vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annexon, Inc. (ANNX) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANNX vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANNX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 42.9%
- +245.8% vs IMVT's +107.2%
IMVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.37
- 188.1% 10Y total return vs ANNX's -67.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -21.3% revenue growth vs ANNX's -77.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.37 vs ANNX's 2.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +245.8% vs IMVT's +107.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -44.1% ROA vs ANNX's -72.2% |
ANNX vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANNX and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$216M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$207M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$177M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.0% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ANNX and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $624M | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $603M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.65x | -10.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.67x | 6.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT delivers a -47.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-47 in annual profit, vs $-92 for ANNX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANNX's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANNX scores 3/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -92.3% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -72.2% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -70.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.4% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $17,386 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,875 for ANNX. Over the past 12 months, ANNX leads with a +245.8% total return vs IMVT's +107.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 14.1% vs ANNX's 2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.6% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +245.8% | +107.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.7% | +48.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.2% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.9% | +188.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
IMVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANNX's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs ANNX's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.18 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.5% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ANNX as "Buy" and IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 180.5% upside for ANNX (target: $16) vs 58.7% for IMVT (target: $46).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IMVT leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
ANNX vs IMVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANNX or IMVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Annexon, Inc.
(ANNX) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ANNX or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to -71. 2% for Annexon, Inc. (ANNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +188. 1% versus ANNX's -67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ANNX or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 37β versus Annexon, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning ANNX is approximately 64% more volatile than IMVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 10% for Annexon, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ANNX or IMVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Annexon, Inc.
grew EPS 42. 9% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ANNX or IMVT?
Annexon, Inc.
(ANNX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Immunovant, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANNX leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANNX leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ANNX or IMVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ANNX or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+188. 1% 10Y return). Annexon, Inc. (ANNX) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMVT: +188. 1%, ANNX: -67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ANNX and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.