Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ANPA vs AIXI vs GFAI vs BBAI vs AI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
ANPA vs AIXI vs GFAI vs BBAI vs AI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $78M | $6M | $10M | $19.82B | $1.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $115M | $72M | $127M | $307M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $820K | $-53M | $-24M | $-289M | $-435M |
| Gross Margin | 43.5% | 64.3% | 15.1% | 25.8% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | -44.2% | -27.4% | -68.3% | -151.7% |
| Forward P/E | 94.5x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $46M | $3M | $24M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $320K | $847K | $22M | $87M | $164M |
ANPA vs AIXI vs GFAI vs BBAI vs AI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 6.5 | -93.5% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
| C3.ai, Inc. (AI) | 100 | 26.2 | -73.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANPA vs AIXI vs GFAI vs BBAI vs AI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANPA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 76.1% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.4%
- 13.9% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- +76.1% vs AIXI's -83.1%
- 14.9% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 25.7% vs -34.4%
AIXI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- Beta 0.71 vs BBAI's 3.31
GFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.36, current ratio 4.92x
Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.52, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 6.86x
- 25.3% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.1% vs AIXI's -83.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.9% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 25.7% vs -34.4% |
ANPA vs AIXI vs GFAI vs BBAI vs AI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ANPA vs AIXI vs GFAI vs BBAI vs AI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANPA leads in 3 of 6 categories
AIXI leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • AI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANPA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AI is the larger business by revenue, generating $307M annually — 52.2x ANPA's $6M. ANPA is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, GFAI holds the edge at +3.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $115M | $72M | $127M | $307M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$49M | -$12M | -$75M | -$455M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$53M | -$24M | -$289M | -$435M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M | -$6M | -$56M | -$127M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +64.3% | +15.1% | +25.8% | +43.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | -44.2% | -27.4% | -68.3% | -151.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | -45.9% | -32.9% | -2.3% | -141.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | -2.0% | -8.8% | -44.3% | -41.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -64.9% | +3.6% | -0.9% | -46.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -30.0% | +38.9% | +52.0% | -53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AIXI and GFAI and BBAI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $78M | $6M | $10M | $19.8B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78M | $51M | -$9M | $19.8B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 94.51x | -0.38x | -0.87x | -5.11x | -3.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.90x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.17x | 0.09x | 0.28x | 155.25x | 3.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 30.41x | — | 0.16x | 24.57x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 96.40x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANPA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANPA delivers a 38.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. AI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANPA's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs AI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.5% | — | -69.7% | -50.7% | -60.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.9% | -65.3% | -50.2% | -35.3% | -48.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.7% | -34.4% | -41.6% | -19.5% | -35.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +36.6% | -3.4% | -19.1% | -19.6% | -35.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | — | 0.08x | 0.04x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $856,315 | $45M | -$19M | -$63M | -$160M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $320,161 | $846,593 | $22M | $87M | $164M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $46M | $3M | $24M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.65x | -14.13x | -167.24x | -18.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANPA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANPA five years ago would be worth $17,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, ANPA leads with a +76.1% total return vs AIXI's -83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANPA at 20.8% vs AIXI's -77.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -72.7% | +39.3% | -28.2% | -28.3% | -36.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.1% | -83.1% | -58.2% | +28.9% | -63.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.1% | -98.8% | -91.1% | +76.1% | -54.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.1% | -98.9% | -99.5% | -56.8% | -83.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.1% | -98.9% | -99.5% | -57.4% | -83.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.8% | -77.0% | -55.4% | +20.7% | -23.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIXI and BBAI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BBAI currently trades 44.6% from its 52-week high vs ANPA's 3.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 0.71x | 2.36x | 3.31x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $180.64 | $77.80 | $1.50 | $9.39 | $30.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.80 | $0.27 | $0.38 | $3.01 | $7.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.4% | +15.4% | +30.7% | +44.6% | +29.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.4 | 44.4 | 45.9 | 60.4 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 13.2M | 305K | 34.4M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", AI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.2% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs -15.8% for AI (target: $7).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $6.00 | $7.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 4 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ANPA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
ANPA vs AIXI vs GFAI vs BBAI vs AI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANPA or AIXI or GFAI or BBAI or AI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, C3.
ai, Inc. (AI) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (ANPA) offers the better valuation at 94. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ANPA or AIXI or GFAI or BBAI or AI?
Over the past 5 years, Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (ANPA) delivered a total return of +76.
1%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANPA returned +76. 1% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ANPA or AIXI or GFAI or BBAI or AI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 367% more volatile than AIXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, C3. ai, Inc. (AI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 46% for Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ANPA or AIXI or GFAI or BBAI or AI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), C3.
ai, Inc. (AI) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 7% for Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ANPA or AIXI or GFAI or BBAI or AI?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (ANPA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANPA leads at 15. 5% versus -83. 4% for AI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ANPA or AIXI or GFAI or BBAI or AI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ANPA or AIXI or GFAI or BBAI or AI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71)). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIXI: -98. 9%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ANPA and AIXI and GFAI and BBAI and AI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANPA (Industrials) and AIXI (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and BBAI (Technology) and AI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANPA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.