AOS vs HD vs LOW vs LII

For growth investors, The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 7% for Lennox International Inc. (LII). A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, A.

O. Smith Corporation (AOS) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus Lennox International Inc. at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, A. O. Smith Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lennox International Inc. wins at 1. 13x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Lennox International Inc.

(LII) delivered a total return of +57. 8%, compared to -6. 5% for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LII returned +309. 4% versus AOS's +81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), A.

O. Smith Corporation (AOS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Lennox International Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning LII is approximately 53% more volatile than AOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 177% for Lennox International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus -2. 7% for Lennox International Inc. (LII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: A. O. Smith Corporation grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for The Home Depot, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LII leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Lennox International Inc.

(LII) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 1% net margin versus 7. 7% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LII leads at 19. 5% versus 11. 8% for LOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AOS leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Lennox International Inc. (LII) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Lennox International Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HD: 26. 5% to $408. 08.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 9% for Lennox International Inc. (LII).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lowe's Companies, Inc.

(LOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 2. 0% yield, +244. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOW: +244. 9%, LII: +309. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AOS (Industrials) and HD (Consumer Cyclical) and LOW (Consumer Cyclical) and LII (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AOS is a small-cap deep-value stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LOW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LII is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.