Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARDX vs CHRS vs PTGX vs IMVT vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ARDX vs CHRS vs PTGX vs IMVT vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.71B | $213M | $6.36B | $5.53B | $2.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $428M | $42M | $18M | $0.00 | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $168M | $-115M | $-464M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | 91.9% | -37.3% | 100.0% | — | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | -429.5% | -8.1% | — | -83.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.2x | 30.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $212M | $1M | $10M | $98K | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $89M | $128M | $714M | $434M |
ARDX vs CHRS vs PTGX vs IMVT vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 381.4 | +281.4% |
| Coherus Oncology, I… (CHRS) | 100 | 9.4 | -90.6% |
| Protagonist Therape… (PTGX) | 100 | 598.0 | +498.0% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARDX vs CHRS vs PTGX vs IMVT vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARDX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4%
CHRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 398.4% margin vs PTGX's -6.5%
- 42.4% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%
PTGX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.25
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs ARDX's 263.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 12.71x
- Beta 0.25, current ratio 12.71x
IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 398.4% margin vs PTGX's -6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs CHRS's 2.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.4% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.4% ROA vs RARE's -45.8% |
ARDX vs CHRS vs PTGX vs IMVT vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARDX vs CHRS vs PTGX vs IMVT vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTGX leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARDX leads 1 • CHRS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARDX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue. CHRS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTGX's -6.5%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $428M | $42M | $18M | $0 | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$35M | -$184M | -$141M | -$487M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | $168M | -$115M | -$464M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$37M | -$139M | -$116M | -$423M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.9% | -37.3% | +100.0% | — | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | -4.3% | -8.1% | — | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | +4.0% | -6.5% | — | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | -3.3% | -6.6% | — | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.5% | -76.5% | -100.0% | — | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +29.5% | +126.3% | +19.7% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CHRS and PTGX and RARE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $213M | $6.4B | $5.5B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $126M | $6.2B | $4.8B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.85x | 1.23x | -48.22x | -9.97x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 30.60x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.20x | 5.06x | 138.15x | — | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.08x | 3.47x | 10.22x | 5.83x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 113.36x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ARDX and CHRS and IMVT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHRS delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARDX's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHRS scores 4/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -38.1% | +7.9% | -17.8% | -47.1% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.8% | +42.4% | -16.5% | -44.1% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.7% | — | -21.8% | — | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | -127.8% | -23.9% | -66.1% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 0.02x | 0.02x | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $144M | -$87M | -$118M | -$714M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $89M | $128M | $714M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $212M | $1M | $10M | $98,000 | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.28x | -28.88x | — | — | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARDX five years ago would be worth $41,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,229 for CHRS. Over the past 12 months, PTGX leads with a +129.4% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTGX at 58.3% vs CHRS's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | +28.5% | +13.4% | +5.1% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.6% | +86.0% | +129.4% | +96.1% | -21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.6% | -78.4% | +296.5% | +40.9% | -44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +313.0% | -87.7% | +238.8% | +62.4% | -77.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +263.5% | -90.8% | +744.9% | +173.6% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | -40.0% | +58.3% | +12.1% | -17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
PTGX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTGX is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHRS's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTGX currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 2.29x | 0.25x | 1.37x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.40 | $2.62 | $107.84 | $30.09 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.21 | $0.71 | $41.29 | $13.36 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +67.3% | +91.7% | +90.5% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.6 | 48.5 | 56.4 | 60.2 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 1.1M | 752K | 1.4M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARDX as "Buy", CHRS as "Buy", PTGX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 242.0% upside for CHRS (target: $6) vs 18.1% for PTGX (target: $117).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $6.02 | $116.75 | $45.50 | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 16 | 26 | 23 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PTGX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). ARDX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ARDX vs CHRS vs PTGX vs IMVT vs RARE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARDX or CHRS or PTGX or IMVT or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARDX or CHRS or PTGX or IMVT or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) delivered a total return of +313. 0%, compared to -87. 7% for Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTGX returned +744. 9% versus CHRS's -90. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARDX or CHRS or PTGX or IMVT or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Coherus Oncology, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning CHRS is approximately 814% more volatile than PTGX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 127% for Ardelyx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ARDX or CHRS or PTGX or IMVT or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coherus Oncology, Inc. grew EPS 472. 0% year-over-year, compared to -148. 5% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARDX or CHRS or PTGX or IMVT or RARE?
Coherus Oncology, Inc.
(CHRS) is the more profitable company, earning 398. 4% net margin versus -282. 8% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 398. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -429. 5% for CHRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTGX leads at 97. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ARDX or CHRS or PTGX or IMVT or RARE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHRS: 242.
0% to $6. 02.
07Which pays a better dividend — ARDX or CHRS or PTGX or IMVT or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ARDX or CHRS or PTGX or IMVT or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25), +744. 9% 10Y return). Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTGX: +744. 9%, CHRS: -90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ARDX and CHRS and PTGX and IMVT and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHRS is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.