Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ARDX vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ARDX vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.71B | $3.01B | $3.86B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $428M | $777M | $1.10B | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $-29M | $376M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 91.9% | 89.4% | 91.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | -5.5% | 7.4% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.1x | 50.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $212M | $41M | $52M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $128M | $178M | $357M |
ARDX vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 545.3 | +445.3% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 284.7 | +184.7% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARDX vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
- 263.5% 10Y total return vs SUPN's 228.4%
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 4.31x
- 22.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
SUPN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.78
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 1.90x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.78 vs PRAX's 1.55
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 34.3% margin vs ARDX's -13.6%
- 26.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs ACAD's +52.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs ARDX's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs ACAD's +52.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0% |
ARDX vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARDX vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ARDX leads 0 • SUPN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARDX's -13.6%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $428M | $777M | $1.1B | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$35M | $29M | $96M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | -$29M | $376M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$37M | $82M | $212M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.9% | +89.4% | +91.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | -5.5% | +7.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | -3.7% | +34.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +10.6% | +19.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.5% | +38.6% | +9.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +81.0% | -81.8% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SUPN and ACAD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 53.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $3.0B | $3.9B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $2.9B | $3.7B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.85x | -76.88x | 9.85x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.12x | 50.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 53.44x | 26.91x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.20x | 4.19x | 3.61x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.08x | 2.78x | 3.15x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.45x | 36.74x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARDX's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -38.1% | -2.7% | +35.6% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.8% | -2.0% | +26.2% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.7% | -2.8% | +10.0% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | -3.4% | +10.1% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 0.04x | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $144M | -$87M | -$126M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $128M | $178M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $212M | $41M | $52M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.28x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARDX five years ago would be worth $41,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs ACAD's +52.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ACAD's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | +5.7% | -13.7% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.6% | +69.0% | +52.4% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.6% | +42.1% | +4.7% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +313.0% | +78.0% | +7.1% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +263.5% | +228.4% | -22.9% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | +12.4% | +1.5% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SUPN and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUPN is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ACAD's 81.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.78x | 1.26x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.40 | $59.68 | $27.81 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.21 | $29.16 | $14.45 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +87.6% | +81.1% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.6 | 57.9 | 44.2 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 604K | 1.8M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARDX as "Buy", SUPN as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.6% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs 14.8% for SUPN (target: $60).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $60.00 | $34.78 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 14 | 37 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ARDX vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX?
On forward P/E, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) delivered a total return of +313. 0%, compared to -20. 8% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARDX returned +263. 5% versus ACAD's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 97% more volatile than SUPN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 127% for Ardelyx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -15. 1% for Ardelyx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -10. 1% for ARDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) trades at 24. 1x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 26. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARDX: 143. 6% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ARDX or SUPN or ACAD or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), +228. 4% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUPN: +228. 4%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARDX and SUPN and ACAD and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.