Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AREN vs IAC vs ZD vs FUBO vs NWSA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AREN
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$133M
5Y Perf.-70.5%
IAC
IAC InterActive Corp.

Internet Content & Information

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.21B
5Y Perf.-10.7%
ZD
Ziff Davis, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.64B
5Y Perf.-36.4%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.-92.2%
NWSA
News Corporation

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$15.27B
5Y Perf.+120.7%

AREN vs IAC vs ZD vs FUBO vs NWSA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AREN logoAREN
IAC logoIAC
ZD logoZD
FUBO logoFUBO
NWSA logoNWSA
IndustryInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & InformationAdvertising AgenciesBroadcastingEntertainment
Market Cap$133M$3.21B$1.64B$317M$15.27B
Revenue (TTM)$135M$2.25B$1.45B$2.72B$9.03B
Net Income (TTM)$125M$41M$47M$156M$1.69B
Gross Margin50.7%64.6%77.8%11.1%34.9%
Operating Margin30.3%1.5%13.2%-2.6%7.8%
Forward P/E4.7x109.7x7.1x25.8x
Total Debt$100M$1.43B$892M$670M$2.94B
Cash & Equiv.$10M$960M$607M$452M$2.40B

AREN vs IAC vs ZD vs FUBO vs NWSALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AREN
IAC
ZD
FUBO
NWSA
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Arena Group Hol… (AREN)10029.5-70.5%
IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC)10089.3-10.7%
Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD)10063.6-36.4%
fuboTV Inc. (FUBO)1007.8-92.2%
News Corporation (NWSA)100220.7+120.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AREN vs IAC vs ZD vs FUBO vs NWSA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AREN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. News Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. ZD and FUBO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AREN
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

AREN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (4.7x vs 25.8x)
  • 92.6% margin vs IAC's 1.8%
  • 104.8% ROA vs IAC's 0.6%, ROIC 82.8% vs -1.2%
Best for: value and quality
IAC
IAC InterActive Corp.
The Defensive Pick

IAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 29.8%, current ratio 2.75x
  • Beta 1.10, current ratio 2.75x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ZD
Ziff Davis, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ZD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +36.9% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Best for: momentum
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
The Growth Play

FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
  • 67.7% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
Best for: growth exposure
NWSA
News Corporation
The Income Pick

NWSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.2%
  • 136.5% 10Y total return vs IAC's 347.8%
  • Beta 0.60 vs FUBO's 1.77
  • 1.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUBO logoFUBO67.7% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
ValueAREN logoARENLower P/E (4.7x vs 25.8x)
Quality / MarginsAREN logoAREN92.6% margin vs IAC's 1.8%
Stability / SafetyNWSA logoNWSABeta 0.60 vs FUBO's 1.77
DividendsNWSA logoNWSA1.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ZD logoZD+36.9% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Efficiency (ROA)AREN logoAREN104.8% ROA vs IAC's 0.6%, ROIC 82.8% vs -1.2%

AREN vs IAC vs ZD vs FUBO vs NWSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ARENThe Arena Group Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Digital Revenue
53.7%$134M
Digital Advertising
34.9%$87M
Performance Marketing
7.9%$20M
Digital Subscriptions
2.3%$6M
Product and Service, Other
0.8%$2M
Print Revenue
0.4%$1M
IACIAC InterActive Corp.
FY 2025
People Inc.
73.6%$1.8B
Care.com
14.5%$347M
Search
8.9%$213M
Emerging & Other
3.0%$71M
Intersegment Eliminations
-0.0%$-145,000
ZDZiff Davis, Inc.
FY 2025
Health and Wellness
27.7%$402M
Technology and Shopping
24.6%$357M
Cybersecurity and Martech Segment
19.2%$278M
Connectivity
15.9%$231M
Gaming and Entertainment
12.6%$184M
FUBOfuboTV Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription and Circulation
92.4%$1.5B
Advertising
7.1%$115M
Service, Other
0.5%$7M
NWSANews Corporation
FY 2025
Dow Jones Segment
27.6%$2.3B
News And Information Services Segment
25.7%$2.2B
Book Publishing Segment
25.4%$2.1B
Digital Real Estate Services Segment
21.3%$1.8B

AREN vs IAC vs ZD vs FUBO vs NWSA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARENLAGGINGZD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NWSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.0B annually — 67.0x AREN's $135M. AREN is the more profitable business, keeping 92.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IAC's 1.8%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAREN logoARENThe Arena Group H…IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…ZD logoZDZiff Davis, Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$135M$2.2B$1.5B$2.7B$9.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$50M$129M$420M-$14M$469M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$125M$41M$47M$156M$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$30M$60M$288M-$81M$572M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.7%+64.6%+77.8%+11.1%+34.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+30.3%+1.5%+13.2%-2.6%+7.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+92.6%+1.8%+3.3%+5.7%+18.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.5%+2.7%+19.8%-3.0%+6.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-22.0%-25.9%-1.5%+2.5%+8.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.4%+64.8%-99.3%+81.8%+6.1%
AREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FUBO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 1.1x trailing earnings, AREN trades at a 97% valuation discount to ZD's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZD's 4.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IAC's 14.3x.

MetricAREN logoARENThe Arena Group H…IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…ZD logoZDZiff Davis, Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
Market CapShares × price$133M$3.2B$1.6B$317M$15.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$223M$3.7B$1.9B$534M$15.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.06x-32.42x37.66x-44.88x13.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.73x109.69x7.10x25.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.48x14.30x4.45x11.17x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.99x1.34x1.13x0.12x1.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x1.02x0.12x1.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.39x71.54x5.69x21.00x
FUBO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AREN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NWSA delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $1 for IAC. FUBO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZD's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AREN scores 7/9 vs FUBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAREN logoARENThe Arena Group H…IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…ZD logoZDZiff Davis, Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.9%+2.6%+16.2%+18.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+104.8%+0.6%+1.3%+8.1%+10.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+82.8%-1.2%+7.2%-3.3%+6.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+91.0%-1.3%+7.6%-4.1%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975547
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.51x0.25x0.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$90M$466M$285M$218M$537M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$960M$607M$452M$2.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$100M$1.4B$892M$670M$2.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.58x4.84x2.19x10.35x127.43x
AREN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NWSA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NWSA five years ago would be worth $10,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $521 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, ZD leads with a +36.9% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NWSA at 17.3% vs FUBO's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAREN logoARENThe Arena Group H…IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…ZD logoZDZiff Davis, Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-29.4%+10.5%+27.4%-65.3%+3.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-45.3%+22.1%+36.9%-65.6%-3.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.4%-2.9%-33.9%-51.7%+61.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.9%-67.3%-59.2%-94.8%+2.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.7%+347.8%-13.7%-90.3%+136.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.4%-1.0%-12.9%-21.6%+17.3%
NWSA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IAC and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NWSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUBO's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAREN logoARENThe Arena Group H…IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…ZD logoZDZiff Davis, Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.10x1.10x1.19x1.77x0.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.05$45.78$50.55$56.64$31.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.72$29.56$22.45$2.48$22.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.8%+94.2%+85.7%+19.0%+85.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.048.143.738.058.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded77K1.1M1.0M1.9M4.1M
Evenly matched — IAC and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AREN and NWSA each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AREN as "Buy", IAC as "Buy", ZD as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold", NWSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs -0.7% for ZD (target: $43). NWSA is the only dividend payer here at 1.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAREN logoARENThe Arena Group H…IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…ZD logoZDZiff Davis, Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$49.17$43.00$43.00$32.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts233131428
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises101
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.8%+10.6%0.0%+1.0%
Evenly matched — AREN and NWSA each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AREN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUBO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Arena Group Holdings, I… (AREN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AREN vs IAC vs ZD vs FUBO vs NWSA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E (4. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA?

On trailing P/E, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.

(AREN) is the cheapest at 1. 1x versus Ziff Davis, Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA?

Over the past 5 years, News Corporation (NWSA) delivered a total return of +2.

2%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), News Corporation (NWSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

60β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FUBO is approximately 195% more volatile than NWSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 51% for Ziff Davis, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for Ziff Davis, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA?

The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.

(AREN) is the more profitable company, earning 92. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 92. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AREN leads at 30. 3% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.

(AREN) trades at 4. 7x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 105. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA?

In this comparison, NWSA (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. AREN, IAC, ZD, FUBO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AREN or IAC or ZD or FUBO or NWSA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

60), 1. 2% yield, +136. 5% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWSA: +136. 5%, FUBO: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AREN and IAC and ZD and FUBO and NWSA?

These companies operate in different sectors (AREN (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology) and ZD (Communication Services) and FUBO (Communication Services) and NWSA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AREN is a small-cap deep-value stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. NWSA pays a dividend while AREN, IAC, ZD, FUBO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AREN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUBO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 124%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NWSA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AREN and IAC and ZD and FUBO and NWSA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AREN: -22.0% · IAC: -25.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.