ARL vs CBRE vs JLL vs NMRK

For growth investors, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL). American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (0. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc.

(ARL) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus CBRE Group, Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Realty Investors, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, American Realty Investors, Inc.

(ARL) delivered a total return of +76. 9%, compared to +36. 1% for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +405. 3% versus NMRK's +30. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Realty Investors, Inc.

(ARL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Newmark Group, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning NMRK is approximately 59% more volatile than ARL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 114% for Newmark Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus 5. 7% for American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Realty Investors, Inc. grew EPS 206. 6% year-over-year, compared to 22. 6% for CBRE Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

American Realty Investors, Inc.

(ARL) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 2. 9% for CBRE Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMRK leads at 7. 0% versus -12. 9% for ARL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JLL leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for CBRE Group, Inc. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMRK: 24. 5% to $21. 00.

In this comparison, NMRK (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ARL, CBRE, JLL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +405. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBRE: +405. 3%, JLL: +191. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ARL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JLL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NMRK is a small-cap high-growth stock. NMRK pays a dividend while ARL, CBRE, JLL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.