Coal
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARLP vs SOC vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
ARLP vs SOC vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Coal | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $3.29B | $1.84T | $620.85B | $364.18B | $53.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.17B | $1M | $323.90B | $184.43B | $23.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $246M | $-498M | $28.84B | $12.30B | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | -8.7% | 21.7% | 30.4% | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | -367.6% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 7.5x | 14.8x | 15.0x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $480M | $0.00 | $43.54B | $46.74B | $23.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $71M | $98M | $10.68B | $6.47B | $1.99B |
ARLP vs SOC vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Resource P… (ARLP) | 100 | 466.2 | +366.2% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 255.9 | +155.9% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARLP vs SOC vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARLP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 10.3%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs XOM's 105.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 2.10x
- Beta 0.07, yield 10.3%, current ratio 2.10x
SOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 9.5% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 13.0x)
XOM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- +43.9% vs SOC's -36.8%
Among these 5 stocks, CVX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OXY is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 20.3% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, vs XOM's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 12.9% vs -44.6% |
ARLP vs SOC vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARLP vs SOC vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARLP leads in 3 of 6 categories
SOC leads 0 • XOM leads 0 • CVX leads 0 • OXY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ARLP and OXY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 254842.6x SOC's $1M. OXY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $1M | $323.9B | $184.4B | $23.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $626M | -$454M | $59.9B | $37.1B | $10.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $246M | -$498M | $28.8B | $12.3B | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $339M | -$611M | $23.6B | $16.2B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | -8.7% | +21.7% | +30.4% | +26.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | -367.6% | +10.5% | +9.0% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | -391.5% | +8.9% | +6.7% | +20.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | -480.4% | +7.3% | +8.8% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | — | -1.3% | -5.3% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.7% | -5.4% | -11.0% | -24.5% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ARLP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, ARLP trades at a 68% valuation discount to OXY's 33.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARLP's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $1.84T | $620.8B | $364.2B | $53.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $1.84T | $653.7B | $404.5B | $75.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.56x | -3.07x | 21.86x | 27.53x | 33.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.17x | 7.50x | 14.79x | 15.02x | 12.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.40x | — | 10.91x | 10.89x | 6.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.50x | — | 1.92x | 1.97x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 2359.43x | 2.37x | 1.76x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.48x | — | 26.29x | 21.95x | 13.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLP delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OXY's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVX scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | -113.8% | +10.7% | +7.2% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | -28.9% | +6.4% | +4.2% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.9% | -44.6% | +8.6% | +6.2% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.5% | -37.5% | +8.9% | +6.6% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | — | 0.16x | 0.24x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $409M | -$98M | $32.9B | $40.3B | $22.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $71M | $98M | $10.7B | $6.5B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $480M | $0 | $43.5B | $46.7B | $24.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.19x | -2.28x | 69.44x | 17.22x | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARLP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARLP five years ago would be worth $61,901 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARLP at 19.9% vs OXY's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | +9.5% | +20.3% | +18.2% | +27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | -36.8% | +43.9% | +39.5% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.4% | +26.5% | +44.9% | +26.7% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +519.0% | +32.6% | +164.6% | +94.0% | +109.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +195.5% | +32.4% | +105.0% | +135.8% | -7.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.9% | +8.2% | +13.2% | +8.2% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARLP and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARLP currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 1.51x | -0.15x | -0.05x | -0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.45 | $35.00 | $176.41 | $214.71 | $67.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.20 | $3.72 | $101.19 | $133.77 | $38.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +36.7% | +83.0% | +85.0% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 45.8 | 42.4 | 42.1 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 380K | 5.4M | 18.9M | 11.0M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ARLP and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARLP as "Hold", SOC as "Buy", XOM as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", OXY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 4.6% for CVX (target: $191). For income investors, ARLP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.28% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $27.00 | $160.43 | $190.93 | $56.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 4 | 55 | 53 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.3% | — | +2.7% | +3.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 26 | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.63 | — | $4.00 | $6.87 | $1.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
ARLP leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
ARLP vs SOC vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY?
On trailing P/E, Alliance Resource Partners, L.
P. (ARLP) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY?
Over the past 5 years, Alliance Resource Partners, L.
P. (ARLP) delivered a total return of +519. 0%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARLP returned +195. 5% versus OXY's -7. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately -1137% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 65% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -34. 0% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARLP leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY?
Alliance Resource Partners, L.
P. (ARLP) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 2% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARLP leads at 17. 6% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OXY leads at 33. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Chevron Corporation — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY?
In this comparison, ARLP (10.
3% yield), CVX (3. 8% yield), OXY (3. 0% yield), XOM (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARLP or SOC or XOM or CVX or OXY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARLP and SOC and XOM and CVX and OXY?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARLP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ARLP, XOM, CVX, OXY pay a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.