Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AROW vs TRST vs NBTB vs FISI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
AROW vs TRST vs NBTB vs FISI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $612M | $858M | $2.35B | $697M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $278M | $867M | $378M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $44M | $61M | $169M | $75M |
| Gross Margin | 65.3% | 67.1% | 72.1% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 29.2% | 25.3% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 16.9x | 10.8x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $193M | $327M | $334M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $51M | $185M | $109M |
AROW vs TRST vs NBTB vs FISI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arrow Financial Cor… (AROW) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Financial Instituti… (FISI) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AROW vs TRST vs NBTB vs FISI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AROW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
TRST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 28.1%, current ratio 0.26x
- Beta 0.75 vs FISI's 1.01, lower leverage
- +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs AROW's 110.5%
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
FISI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 43.1%, EPS growth 231.3%
- PEG 0.94 vs AROW's 5.30
- NIM 3.2% vs TRST's 2.6%
- 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 16.9x), PEG 0.94 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs FISI's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AROW's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
AROW vs TRST vs NBTB vs FISI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AROW vs TRST vs NBTB vs FISI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FISI leads in 1 of 6 categories
AROW leads 1 • TRST leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRST and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 3.6x AROW's $243M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 22.0% (TRST) to 18.1% (AROW).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $278M | $867M | $378M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $60M | $90M | $241M | $97M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $44M | $61M | $169M | $75M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $46M | $225M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.3% | +67.1% | +72.1% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +29.2% | +25.3% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +22.0% | +19.5% | +19.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +16.4% | +25.2% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +44.1% | +39.5% | +118.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FISI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, FISI trades at a 34% valuation discount to TRST's 14.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISI offers better value at 1.04x vs AROW's 7.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $612M | $858M | $2.4B | $697M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $612M | $1000M | $2.5B | $923M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.99x | 14.90x | 13.53x | 9.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.16x | 16.87x | 10.80x | 8.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.30x | 4.11x | 1.92x | 1.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.05x | 11.14x | 10.35x | 10.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.52x | 3.08x | 2.71x | 1.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 1.29x | 1.21x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.91x | 18.75x | 10.75x | 51.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FISI delivers a 12.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for TRST. AROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISI's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AROW scores 7/9 vs FISI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +8.9% | +9.5% | +12.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +7.2% | +7.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +2.8% | +2.4% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $62,000 | $142M | $142M | $225M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $51M | $185M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $193M | $327M | $334M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.90x | 1.05x | 0.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AROW and TRST and FISI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,317 for AROW. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FISI at 35.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.4% | +18.2% | +9.3% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.8% | +60.3% | +9.0% | +42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.4% | +88.2% | +54.1% | +146.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | +46.5% | +29.9% | +26.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.5% | +97.2% | +102.2% | +67.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.5% | +23.5% | +15.5% | +35.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRST and FISI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRST is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISI's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FISI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs NBTB's 96.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.75x | 0.89x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.09 | $49.11 | $46.92 | $35.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.57 | $30.17 | $39.20 | $24.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +98.6% | +96.1% | +99.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 64.5 | 57.3 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 91K | 112K | 236K | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AROW and FISI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AROW as "Hold", TRST as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FISI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -19.1% for AROW (target: $30). For income investors, FISI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.44% vs AROW's 3.09%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | — | $46.00 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 3 | 10 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +3.1% | +3.2% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 8 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $1.51 | $1.43 | $1.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +4.4% | +0.4% | +1.6% |
FISI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AROW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
AROW vs TRST vs NBTB vs FISI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the stronger pick with 43. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI?
On trailing P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Financial Institutions, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus Arrow Financial Corporation's 5. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +46.
5%, compared to +23. 2% for Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AROW returned +110. 5% versus FISI's +67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus Financial Institutions, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning FISI is approximately 33% more volatile than TRST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 53% for Financial Institutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is pulling ahead at 43. 1% versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Financial Institutions, Inc. grew EPS 231. 3% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 18. 1% for Arrow Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 22. 8% for AROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus Arrow Financial Corporation's 5. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 3. 1% for Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW).
09Is AROW or TRST or NBTB or FISI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRST: +97. 2%, FISI: +67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AROW and TRST and NBTB and FISI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AROW is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.