Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs BEAM vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs BEAM vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $652M | $6.91B | $9.63B | $3.23B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $263M | $51M | $-92K | $132M | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-81M | $-315M | $-327M | $-65M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 99.5% | 33.2% | — | -64.2% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -44.0% | -7.0% | — | -281.0% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $82M | $110K | $294M | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $143M | $357M | $357M | $295M | $214M |
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs BEAM vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) | 100 | 48.7 | -51.3% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 79.9 | -20.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs BEAM vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.15
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 2.0%, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 1.15 vs BEAM's 2.14, lower leverage
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 154.4% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
PRAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 2.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- +7.7% vs CRL's +32.8%
BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- 120.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -2.5% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 6.3% vs -65.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs BEAM's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs CRL's +32.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.5% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 6.3% vs -65.0% |
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs BEAM vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs BEAM vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRL leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ARVN leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.6% (CRL) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $263M | $51M | -$92,000 | $132M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$111M | -$352M | -$357M | -$355M | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$81M | -$315M | -$327M | -$65M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$276M | -$244M | -$283M | -$384M | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.5% | +33.2% | — | -64.2% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.0% | -7.0% | — | -2.8% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.8% | -6.1% | — | -49.2% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -105.0% | -4.7% | — | -2.9% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.0% | +55.5% | — | -100.0% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.1% | +13.4% | +2.7% | +26.6% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $652M | $6.9B | $9.6B | $3.2B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $517M | $6.6B | $9.3B | $3.2B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.96x | -22.93x | -24.72x | -38.85x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 176.26x | — | 23.14x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 4.52x | 8.54x | 2.51x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRL delivers a -5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARVN scores 4/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.3% | -25.0% | -43.0% | -5.9% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.3% | -22.3% | -40.2% | -4.6% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.4% | -24.9% | -65.0% | -31.1% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.0% | -27.2% | -49.3% | -33.3% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.05x | 0.00x | 0.24x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$134M | -$275M | -$357M | -$1M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $143M | $357M | $357M | $295M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $82M | $110,000 | $294M | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2119.53x | — | 1.08x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,601 for ARVN. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs CRL's +32.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ARVN's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | +16.3% | +16.4% | +16.0% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.8% | +190.7% | +775.0% | +93.9% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | +205.1% | +1976.5% | -5.6% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | +92.1% | -20.8% | -55.6% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +154.4% | -20.1% | +67.8% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.5% | +45.0% | +174.9% | -1.9% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARVN and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARVN is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.15x | 1.55x | 2.14x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.51 | $103.00 | $356.00 | $36.44 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.90 | $28.06 | $35.18 | $15.35 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +82.2% | +93.6% | +86.4% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 54.1 | 55.6 | 60.9 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 808K | 602K | 378K | 2.0M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARVN as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $117.06 | $544.40 | $40.83 | $205.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 26 | 16 | 27 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
CRL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ARVN vs KYMR vs PRAX vs BEAM vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or BEAM or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or BEAM or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -84. 0% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +154. 4% versus ARVN's -36. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or BEAM or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arvinas, Inc.
(ARVN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning BEAM is approximately 87% more volatile than ARVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or BEAM or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEAM leads at 31. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or BEAM or CRL?
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRL leads at 12. 6% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or BEAM or CRL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63.
3% to $544. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or BEAM or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ARVN or KYMR or PRAX or BEAM or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), +154. 4% 10Y return). Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +154. 4%, BEAM: +67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ARVN and KYMR and PRAX and BEAM and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.