Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ARVN vs MDGL vs VKTX vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ARVN vs MDGL vs VKTX vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $652M | $12.27B | $3.66B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $263M | $1.13B | $0.00 | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-81M | $-309M | $-472M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 99.5% | 93.1% | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -44.0% | -27.7% | — | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $354M | $137K | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $143M | $199M | $166M | $1.98B |
ARVN vs MDGL vs VKTX vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 461.0 | +361.0% |
| Viking Therapeutics… (VKTX) | 100 | 441.7 | +341.7% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARVN vs MDGL vs VKTX vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARVN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 2.0%, current ratio 4.92x
MDGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- Rev growth 432.1%, EPS growth 41.3%
- 39.2% 10Y total return vs VKTX's 25.8%
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 4.01x
VKTX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IQV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 8.3% margin vs ARVN's -30.8%
- 4.7% ROA vs VKTX's -65.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs -44.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs ARVN's -30.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs VKTX's 1.61 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.0% vs VKTX's +14.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs VKTX's -65.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs -44.4% |
ARVN vs MDGL vs VKTX vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARVN vs MDGL vs VKTX vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories
MDGL leads 2 • ARVN leads 0 • VKTX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and VKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARVN's -30.8%. On growth, MDGL holds the edge at +126.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $263M | $1.1B | $0 | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$111M | -$312M | -$502M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$81M | -$309M | -$472M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$276M | -$272M | -$340M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.5% | +93.1% | — | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.0% | -27.7% | — | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.8% | -27.3% | — | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -105.0% | -24.1% | — | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.0% | +126.8% | — | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.1% | +2.1% | -2.3% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARVN and MDGL and IQV each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $652M | $12.3B | $3.7B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $517M | $12.4B | $3.5B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.96x | -41.62x | -9.90x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 12.80x | — | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 19.91x | 5.57x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-71 for VKTX. VKTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARVN scores 4/9 vs VKTX's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.3% | -50.2% | -71.3% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.3% | -25.4% | -65.3% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.4% | -29.4% | -44.4% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.0% | -32.9% | -51.8% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.59x | 0.00x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$134M | $156M | -$166M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $143M | $199M | $166M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $354M | $137,000 | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -17.51x | -15687.44x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VKTX five years ago would be worth $53,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,601 for ARVN. Over the past 12 months, MDGL leads with a +79.0% total return vs VKTX's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDGL at 20.1% vs ARVN's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | -9.9% | -10.8% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.8% | +79.0% | +14.6% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | +73.2% | +38.1% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | +310.1% | +435.3% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +3921.5% | +2576.3% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.5% | +20.1% | +11.4% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MDGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VKTX's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDGL currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.57x | 1.61x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.51 | $615.00 | $43.15 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.90 | $265.00 | $22.96 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +87.0% | +73.2% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 61.2 | 47.1 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 808K | 310K | 2.3M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARVN as "Buy", MDGL as "Buy", VKTX as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 219.0% upside for VKTX (target: $101) vs 26.3% for IQV (target: $226).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $705.67 | $100.75 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 23 | 24 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDGL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ARVN vs MDGL vs VKTX vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARVN or MDGL or VKTX or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger pick with 432. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARVN or MDGL or VKTX or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
(VKTX) delivered a total return of +435. 3%, compared to -84. 0% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +39. 2% versus ARVN's -36. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARVN or MDGL or VKTX or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Viking Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning VKTX is approximately 184% more volatile than MDGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ARVN or MDGL or VKTX or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is pulling ahead at 432. 1% versus -0. 3% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arvinas, Inc. grew EPS 53. 8% year-over-year, compared to -215. 8% for Viking Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARVN or MDGL or VKTX or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -30. 8% for Arvinas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -43. 8% for ARVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARVN leads at 98. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ARVN or MDGL or VKTX or IQV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VKTX: 219.
0% to $100. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — ARVN or MDGL or VKTX or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ARVN or MDGL or VKTX or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDGL: +39. 2%, VKTX: +25. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ARVN and MDGL and VKTX and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.