Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
ASBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.15B | $4.13B | $3.80B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $953M | $1.89B | $1.36B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $176M | $392M | $287M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 67.4% | 74.7% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.6% | 25.7% | 28.0% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 31.3x | 10.6x | 11.8x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $792M | $1.30B | $303M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $544M | $271M | $1.33B | $52M |
ASBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) | 100 | 105.4 | +5.4% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 155.2 | +55.2% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 191.6 | +91.6% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 191.1 | +91.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASBA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 3.6%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.18 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage
- 3.6% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0%
FULT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 32.5%
- 5.0% NII/revenue growth vs ASBA's -6.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8%
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.67 vs IBCP's 1.82
- NIM 3.4% vs FULT's 3.2%
- +37.7% vs ASBA's +9.7%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs WSFS's 129.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% NII/revenue growth vs ASBA's -6.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.7% vs ASBA's +9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8% |
ASBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASBA leads in 2 of 6 categories
WSFS leads 2 • FULT leads 1 • IBCP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASBA leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 6.0x IBCP's $315M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASBA's 12.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $953M | $1.9B | $1.4B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $617M | $529M | $408M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $176M | $392M | $287M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $605M | $267M | $214M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +67.4% | +74.7% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +25.7% | +28.0% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +20.7% | +21.1% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +15.0% | +15.7% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.9% | +47.2% | +22.9% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 67% valuation discount to ASBA's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.74x vs IBCP's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $4.1B | $3.8B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $5.2B | $2.8B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.29x | 10.31x | 14.16x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.61x | 11.79x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.74x | 0.81x | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.77x | 9.74x | 6.80x | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.36x | 2.18x | 2.79x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.13x | 1.44x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.76x | 14.52x | 17.79x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $4 for ASBA. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FULT's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs ASBA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +11.6% | +10.6% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +7.5% | +9.5% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +9.5% | +10.3% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.37x | 0.11x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$227M | $1.0B | -$1.0B | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $544M | $271M | $1.3B | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $792M | $1.3B | $303M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 0.84x | 1.30x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,944 for ASBA. Over the past 12 months, WSFS leads with a +37.7% total return vs ASBA's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs ASBA's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +11.1% | +31.2% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.7% | +29.6% | +37.7% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.4% | +130.4% | +135.3% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +41.4% | +43.1% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +106.1% | +129.0% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.6% | +32.1% | +33.0% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ASBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASBA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASBA currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 1.13x | 0.89x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.37 | $22.99 | $73.22 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.29 | $16.60 | $49.92 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +93.3% | +98.4% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 55.8 | 64.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 2.0M | 385K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASBA and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FULT as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 3.6% for WSFS (target: $75). For income investors, ASBA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $24.00 | $74.67 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 13 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +3.6% | +0.9% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $0.77 | $0.68 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.6% | +7.6% | +1.8% |
ASBA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). WSFS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ASBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Associated Banc-Corp at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 67x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to +19. 4% for Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus ASBA's +19. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
18β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 513% more volatile than ASBA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 37% for Fulton Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus -6. 6% for Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -29. 2% for Associated Banc-Corp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 12. 9% for Associated Banc-Corp — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus 24. 6% for ASBA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASBA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for WSFS Financial Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 11. 9% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is ASBA or FULT or WSFS or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
18), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASBA: +19. 4%, FULT: +106. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASBA and FULT and WSFS and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASBA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.