Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASLE vs WLFC vs AL vs FTAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
ASLE vs WLFC vs AL vs FTAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $346M | $1.71B | $7.26B | $27.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $340M | $763M | $3.02B | $2.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $121M | $1.09B | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 53.9% | 38.4% | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 20.4% | 29.5% | 28.2% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 16.3x | 12.8x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $2.71B | $19.73B | $3.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $16M | $466M | $300M |
ASLE vs WLFC vs AL vs FTAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AerSale Corporation (ASLE) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
| Willis Lease Financ… (WLFC) | 100 | 1069.6 | +969.6% |
| Air Lease Corporati… (AL) | 100 | 215.7 | +115.7% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) | 100 | 2836.0 | +2736.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASLE vs WLFC vs AL vs FTAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASLE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 8.2%, current ratio 3.71x
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 37.1x)
WLFC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.23 vs AL's 0.79
AL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 1.3%
- Beta 0.30, yield 1.3%, current ratio 0.93x
- 36.1% margin vs ASLE's 3.5%
- Beta 0.30 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage
FTAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 43.2%, EPS growth 15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.4%
- 33.3% 10Y total return vs WLFC's 8.8%
- 43.2% revenue growth vs ASLE's -2.8%
- +149.0% vs ASLE's +4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.2% revenue growth vs ASLE's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 37.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.1% margin vs ASLE's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs WLFC's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.0% vs ASLE's +4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs ASLE's 1.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs 2.4% |
ASLE vs WLFC vs AL vs FTAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASLE vs WLFC vs AL vs FTAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories
FTAI leads 2 • ASLE leads 1 • WLFC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AL is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 8.9x ASLE's $340M. AL is the more profitable business, keeping 36.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASLE's 3.5%. On growth, FTAI holds the edge at +65.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $340M | $763M | $3.0B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $273M | $2.1B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $121M | $1.1B | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$277M | -$1.7B | -$1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +53.9% | +38.4% | +31.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +20.4% | +29.5% | +28.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +15.8% | +36.1% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -36.2% | -57.4% | -48.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +23.2% | +15.1% | +65.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.0% | +57.9% | +81.9% | +48.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ASLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, AL trades at a 88% valuation discount to FTAI's 59.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WLFC offers better value at 0.21x vs AL's 0.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $346M | $1.7B | $7.3B | $28.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $377M | $4.4B | $6.8B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.72x | 14.65x | 7.00x | 59.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.02x | 16.27x | 12.76x | 37.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.21x | 0.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.73x | 13.38x | — | 31.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.03x | 2.54x | 2.41x | 11.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 2.18x | 0.86x | 84.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI delivers a 181.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $181 in annual profit, vs $3 for ASLE. ASLE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTAI's 10.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AL scores 8/9 vs WLFC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +17.1% | +13.2% | +181.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +3.2% | +3.3% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +5.3% | +4.2% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +6.2% | +5.0% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 3.74x | 2.33x | 10.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $2.7B | $19.3B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $16M | $466M | $300M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $2.7B | $19.7B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.49x | 1.79x | 6.32x | 3.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTAI five years ago would be worth $114,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,083 for ASLE. Over the past 12 months, FTAI leads with a +149.0% total return vs ASLE's +4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTAI at 115.8% vs ASLE's -23.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +68.4% | +1.7% | +29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.1% | +68.2% | +22.5% | +149.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.9% | +344.6% | +79.9% | +905.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | +440.7% | +56.3% | +1046.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.3% | +879.9% | +129.9% | +3325.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.3% | +64.4% | +21.6% | +115.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AL is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTAI's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ASLE's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 1.66x | 0.30x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.12 | $239.44 | $65.00 | $323.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.56 | $114.01 | $51.66 | $105.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +94.2% | +100.0% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.1 | 75.6 | 66.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 273K | 76K | 2.5M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASLE as "Hold", WLFC as "Buy", AL as "Buy", FTAI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 84.2% upside for ASLE (target: $14) vs 0.0% for AL (target: $65). For income investors, AL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.35% vs WLFC's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | — | $65.00 | $297.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 1 | 20 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +1.3% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 13 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.81 | $0.87 | $1.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). FTAI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
ASLE vs WLFC vs AL vs FTAI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is the stronger pick with 43. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for AerSale Corporation (ASLE). Air Lease Corporation (AL) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI?
On trailing P/E, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the cheapest at 7.
0x versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, AerSale Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Willis Lease Finance Corporation wins at 0. 23x versus Air Lease Corporation's 0. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) delivered a total return of +1047%, compared to -39. 2% for AerSale Corporation (ASLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTAI returned +33. 3% versus ASLE's -24. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning FTAI is approximately 502% more volatile than AL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AerSale Corporation (ASLE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 10% for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is pulling ahead at 43. 2% versus -2. 8% for AerSale Corporation (ASLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTAI Aviation Ltd. grew EPS 1538% year-over-year, compared to 0. 3% for Willis Lease Finance Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTAI leads at 51. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI?
Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 2. 6% for AerSale Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AL leads at 50. 5% versus 4. 7% for ASLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLFC leads at 65. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Air Lease Corporation's 0. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, AerSale Corporation (ASLE) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 37. 1x for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — 26. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASLE: 84. 2% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI?
In this comparison, AL (1.
3% yield), FTAI (0. 5% yield), WLFC (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ASLE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASLE or WLFC or AL or FTAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 3% yield, +129. 9% 10Y return). FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AL: +129. 9%, FTAI: +33. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASLE and WLFC and AL and FTAI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WLFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; AL is a small-cap deep-value stock; FTAI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. AL pays a dividend while ASLE, WLFC, FTAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.