ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
Other Precious Metals
Market Cap$1.08B
5Y Perf.+894.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ASM vs CAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$416.75B
5Y Perf.+645.6%
ASM vs CAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ASM | CAT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.08B | $416.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $70.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $9.42B |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 35.8% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 38.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $43.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $9.98B |
ASM vs CAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ASM
CAT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avino Silver & Gold… (ASM) | 100 | 994.2 | +894.2% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASM vs CAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ASM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Caterpillar Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
The Growth Play
ASM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 30.9%, EPS growth 183.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.05, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 4.06x
- 30.9% revenue growth vs CAT's 4.3%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
The Income Pick
CAT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.54, yield 0.7%
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs ASM's 435.9%
- Beta 1.54, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.44x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ASM | 30.9% revenue growth vs CAT's 4.3% |
| Value | ASM | Lower P/E (19.2x vs 38.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | ASM | 30.4% margin vs CAT's 13.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CAT | Beta 1.54 vs ASM's 2.05 |
| Dividends | CAT | 0.7% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CAT | +181.5% vs ASM's +178.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ASM | 12.7% ROA vs CAT's 10.0%, ROIC 18.4% vs 15.9% |
ASM vs CAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
ASM vs CAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLASMLAGGINGCAT
CATCaterpillar Inc.
1leads
ASMAvino Silver & Gold M…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CATMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ASM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ASM4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ASM7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CAT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 802.9x ASM's $88M. ASM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAT's 13.3%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ASMAvino Silver & Go… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $70.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $14.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $9.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $11.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.4% | +22.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.1% | +30.2% |
ASM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ASM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.4x trailing earnings, ASM trades at a 15% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASM's 29.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAT's 33.4x.
| Metric | ASMAvino Silver & Go… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $416.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $980M | $450.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.35x | 47.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.19x | 38.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.37x | 33.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.42x | 6.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.63x | 19.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 940.81x | 40.56x |
ASM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $15 for ASM. ASM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASM scores 6/9 vs CAT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ASMAvino Silver & Go… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | +47.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.7% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.4% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.1% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$96M | $33.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $43.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 73.35x | 9.22x |
ASM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ASM and CAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASM five years ago would be worth $49,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38,251 for CAT. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs ASM's +178.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASM at 99.5% vs CAT's 62.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASMAvino Silver & Go… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +50.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +178.9% | +181.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +694.5% | +324.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +390.0% | +282.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +435.9% | +1227.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +99.5% | +62.0% |
Evenly matched — ASM and CAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASM's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs ASM's 57.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ASMAvino Silver & Go… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.99 | $931.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.19 | $318.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.2% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 76.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.8M | 2.4M |
CAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASM as "Buy" and CAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.9% upside for ASM (target: $11) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). CAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ASMAvino Silver & Go… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.83 | $824.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ASM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CAT leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallAvino Silver & Gold Mines L… (ASM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ASM vs CAT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASM or CAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
(ASM) is the stronger pick with 30. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) offers the better valuation at 40. 4x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASM or CAT?
On trailing P/E, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
(ASM) is the cheapest at 40. 4x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. is actually cheaper at 19. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASM or CAT?
Over the past 5 years, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
(ASM) delivered a total return of +390. 0%, compared to +282. 5% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus ASM's +435. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASM or CAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 54β versus Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. 's 2. 05β — meaning ASM is approximately 33% more volatile than CAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASM or CAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
(ASM) is pulling ahead at 30. 9% versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. grew EPS 183. 3% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASM leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASM or CAT?
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
(ASM) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 3% net margin versus 13. 1% for Caterpillar Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASM leads at 33. 9% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASM leads at 48. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASM or CAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
(ASM) trades at 19. 2x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASM: 57. 9% to $10. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASM or CAT?
In this comparison, CAT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. ASM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASM or CAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield, +1228% 10Y return). Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAT: +1228%, ASM: +435. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASM and CAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASM (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CAT pays a dividend while ASM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ASM: 8.4% · CAT: 22.2%)Net Margin>
%
(ASM: 30.4% · CAT: 13.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ASM: 40.4x · CAT: 47.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.