Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ASM vs EXK vs MFG vs PAAS vs CDE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Other Precious Metals
Banks - Regional
Silver
Gold
ASM vs EXK vs MFG vs PAAS vs CDE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Other Precious Metals | Banks - Regional | Silver | Gold |
| Market Cap | $1.08B | $2.99B | $106.56B | $24.36B | $11.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $330M | $8.60T | $4.02B | $2.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $-94M | $1.01T | $1.27B | $799M |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 9.3% | 41.8% | 43.8% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 35.8% | -1.7% | 13.8% | 37.9% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 14.3x | 0.1x | 12.4x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $120M | $60.89T | $935M | $365M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $106M | $72.48T | $1.21B | $554M |
ASM vs EXK vs MFG vs PAAS vs CDE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avino Silver & Gold… (ASM) | 100 | 994.2 | +894.2% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 528.6 | +428.6% |
| Mizuho Financial Gr… (MFG) | 100 | 347.8 | +247.8% |
| Pan American Silver… (PAAS) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 315.0 | +215.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASM vs EXK vs MFG vs PAAS vs CDE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 435.9% 10Y total return vs MFG's 240.7%
Among these 5 stocks, EXK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 1.8%
- PEG 0.01 vs PAAS's 0.49
- Lower P/E (0.1x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.01 vs 0.49
- 1.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PAAS's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PAAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 13.4%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.69x
- 31.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
- Beta 0.74 vs ASM's 2.05
CDE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- 96.4% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
- +216.1% vs MFG's +78.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.01 vs 0.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs ASM's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PAAS's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.1% vs MFG's +78.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.0% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC 15.7% vs 1.5% |
ASM vs EXK vs MFG vs PAAS vs CDE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASM vs EXK vs MFG vs PAAS vs CDE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFG leads in 2 of 6 categories
CDE leads 1 • ASM leads 1 • EXK leads 0 • PAAS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.60T annually — 97593.4x ASM's $88M. PAAS is the more profitable business, keeping 31.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $330M | $8.60T | $4.0B | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $49M | $1.30T | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | -$94M | $1.01T | $1.3B | $799M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$129M | $0 | $1.4B | $915M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +9.3% | +41.8% | +43.8% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | -1.7% | +13.8% | +37.9% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | -28.4% | +10.3% | +31.7% | +31.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -39.1% | -48.4% | +34.0% | +35.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.4% | +154.0% | — | +49.2% | +137.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.1% | -97.5% | +46.9% | +134.8% | +4.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, MFG trades at a 52% valuation discount to ASM's 40.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDE offers better value at 0.39x vs MFG's 1.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $3.0B | $106.6B | $24.4B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $980M | $3.0B | $32.4B | $24.1B | $11.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.35x | -78.08x | 19.33x | 22.15x | 20.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.19x | 14.34x | 0.09x | 12.39x | 9.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.32x | 0.88x | 0.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.37x | 76.02x | 3.63x | 14.00x | 11.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.42x | 13.72x | 1.94x | 6.61x | 5.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.63x | 5.07x | 1.63x | 3.16x | 3.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 940.81x | — | — | 22.52x | 17.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ASM and PAAS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAAS delivers a 19.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-18 for EXK. ASM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MFG's 5.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAAS scores 7/9 vs EXK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | -18.4% | +9.1% | +19.6% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.7% | -9.2% | +0.3% | +14.0% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.4% | +1.5% | +1.3% | +15.7% | +23.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.1% | +1.6% | +2.1% | +15.4% | +23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.25x | 5.79x | 0.13x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$96M | $14M | -$11.60T | -$277M | -$188M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $106M | $72.48T | $1.2B | $554M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $120M | $60.89T | $935M | $365M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 73.35x | -39.17x | 0.28x | 23.79x | 47.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASM five years ago would be worth $49,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,111 for EXK. Over the past 12 months, CDE leads with a +216.1% total return vs MFG's +78.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASM at 99.5% vs EXK's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +12.5% | +16.9% | +13.6% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +178.9% | +193.4% | +78.3% | +137.5% | +216.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +694.5% | +144.0% | +206.8% | +229.9% | +414.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +390.0% | +61.1% | +209.1% | +71.4% | +96.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +435.9% | +182.7% | +240.7% | +326.1% | +149.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +99.5% | +34.6% | +45.3% | +48.9% | +72.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MFG and PAAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASM's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFG currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs ASM's 57.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 1.71x | 1.12x | 0.74x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.99 | $15.15 | $10.28 | $69.99 | $27.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.19 | $3.14 | $4.89 | $22.08 | $5.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.2% | +67.0% | +84.2% | +82.6% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 47.6 | 60.9 | 54.8 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.8M | 9.4M | 4.6M | 6.2M | 22.2M |
Analyst Outlook
MFG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASM as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", MFG as "Hold", PAAS as "Buy", CDE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 15.5% for MFG (target: $10). For income investors, MFG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.78% vs PAAS's 0.81%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.83 | $12.75 | $10.00 | $75.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 | 5 | 24 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $24.08 | $0.47 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +0.2% | +0.1% |
MFG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). CDE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ASM vs EXK vs MFG vs PAAS vs CDE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE?
On trailing P/E, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
(MFG) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. at 40. 4x. On forward P/E, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 01x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE?
Over the past 5 years, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
(ASM) delivered a total return of +390. 0%, compared to +61. 1% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASM returned +435. 9% versus CDE's +149. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. 's 2. 05β — meaning ASM is approximately 178% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 6% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pan American Silver Corp. grew EPS 741. 9% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE?
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
(ASM) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 3% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 31. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDE leads at 36. 3% versus 3. 8% for EXK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASM leads at 48. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. — 19. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE?
In this comparison, MFG (1.
8% yield), PAAS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. ASM, EXK, CDE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASM or EXK or MFG or PAAS or CDE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 8% yield, +326. 1% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +326. 1%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASM and EXK and MFG and PAAS and CDE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASM (Basic Materials) and EXK (Basic Materials) and MFG (Financial Services) and PAAS (Basic Materials) and CDE (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASM is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MFG, PAAS pay a dividend while ASM, EXK, CDE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.