Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASMB vs ARWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ASMB vs ARWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $492M | $10.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63M | $622M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-301M |
| Gross Margin | 74.3% | 85.1% |
| Operating Margin | -21.5% | -35.7% |
| Total Debt | $3M | $366M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $227M |
ASMB vs ARWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assembly Bioscience… (ASMB) | 100 | 13.2 | -86.8% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 241.8 | +141.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASMB vs ARWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.67
- Lower volatility, beta 1.67, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 5.22x
- Beta 1.67, current ratio 5.22x
ARWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs ASMB's -47.8%
- 232.6% revenue growth vs ASMB's 153.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 232.6% revenue growth vs ASMB's 153.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -10.2% margin vs ARWR's -48.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.67 vs ARWR's 1.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +496.9% vs ASMB's +149.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.1% ROA vs ARWR's -18.1%, ROIC -12.2% vs 9.3% |
ASMB vs ARWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ASMB and ARWR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $622M annually — 9.9x ASMB's $63M. ASMB is the more profitable business, keeping -10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARWR's -48.4%. On growth, ARWR holds the edge at -86.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63M | $622M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$203M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$301M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.3% | +85.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.5% | -35.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | -48.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -63.3% | -8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -86.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.8% | -133.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ASMB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $492M | $10.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $436M | $11.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -56.24x | -6389.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 90.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.80x | 13.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | 20.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 69.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASMB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASMB delivers a -4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-55 for ARWR. ASMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARWR's 0.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs ASMB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.2% | -55.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -18.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.2% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.7% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$56M | $140M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $366M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $11,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,349 for ASMB. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs ASMB's +149.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASMB at 35.3% vs ARWR's 24.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.4% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +149.2% | +496.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.8% | +92.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +17.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.8% | +1253.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.3% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASMB and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASMB is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARWR's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs ASMB's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.71 | $79.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.64 | $12.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 69.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 103K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASMB as "Buy" and ARWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.3% upside for ASMB (target: $40) vs 4.2% for ARWR (target: $81).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $81.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ASMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ARWR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ASMB vs ARWR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASMB or ARWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 153. 5% for Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB). Analysts rate Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASMB or ARWR?
Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) delivered a total return of +17. 4%, compared to -36. 5% for Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus ASMB's -47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASMB or ARWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Assembly Biosciences, Inc.
(ASMB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning ARWR is approximately 9% more volatile than ASMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 73% for Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ASMB or ARWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus 153. 5% for Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to 91. 8% for Assembly Biosciences, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ASMB or ARWR?
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 2% net margin versus -8. 5% for Assembly Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus -16. 8% for ASMB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASMB leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ASMB or ARWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ASMB or ARWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1253% 10Y return). Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARWR: +1253%, ASMB: -47. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ASMB and ARWR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.