Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASMB vs GILD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
ASMB vs GILD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $492M | $166.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63M | $29.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $9.22B |
| Gross Margin | 74.3% | 63.0% |
| Operating Margin | -21.5% | 38.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $24.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $7.56B |
ASMB vs GILD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assembly Bioscience… (ASMB) | 100 | 13.2 | -86.8% |
| Gilead Sciences, In… (GILD) | 100 | 172.2 | +72.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASMB vs GILD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASMB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 153.5%, EPS growth 91.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.67, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 5.22x
- 153.5% revenue growth vs GILD's 2.4%
GILD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.4%
- 87.8% 10Y total return vs ASMB's -47.8%
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.68x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 153.5% revenue growth vs GILD's 2.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.0% margin vs ASMB's -10.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs ASMB's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.2% vs GILD's +38.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.1% ROA vs ASMB's -3.1%, ROIC 23.4% vs -12.2% |
ASMB vs GILD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASMB vs GILD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILD is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.7B annually — 472.9x ASMB's $63M. GILD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASMB's -10.2%. On growth, GILD holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63M | $29.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $9.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | $10.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.3% | +63.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.5% | +38.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | +31.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -63.3% | +34.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.8% | +54.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ASMB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $492M | $166.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $436M | $183.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -56.24x | 19.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.80x | 5.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | 7.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GILD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GILD delivers a 42.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ASMB. ASMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GILD's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GILD scores 9/9 vs ASMB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.2% | +42.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | +16.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.2% | +23.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.7% | +25.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$56M | $17.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $24.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 8.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ASMB and GILD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GILD five years ago would be worth $22,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,349 for ASMB. Over the past 12 months, ASMB leads with a +149.2% total return vs GILD's +38.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASMB at 35.3% vs GILD's 22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.4% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +149.2% | +38.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.8% | +82.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +124.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.8% | +87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.3% | +22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GILD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GILD is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASMB's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GILD currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs ASMB's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.71 | $157.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.64 | $95.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 103K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASMB as "Buy" and GILD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.3% upside for ASMB (target: $40) vs 20.8% for GILD (target: $162). GILD is the only dividend payer here at 2.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $161.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
GILD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ASMB vs GILD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASMB or GILD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Assembly Biosciences, Inc.
(ASMB) is the stronger pick with 153. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) offers the better valuation at 19. 8x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASMB or GILD?
Over the past 5 years, Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) delivered a total return of +124. 2%, compared to -36. 5% for Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GILD returned +87. 8% versus ASMB's -47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASMB or GILD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Assembly Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning ASMB is approximately 154% more volatile than GILD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 109% for Gilead Sciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ASMB or GILD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Assembly Biosciences, Inc.
(ASMB) is pulling ahead at 153. 5% versus 2. 4% for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gilead Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 1684% year-over-year, compared to 91. 8% for Assembly Biosciences, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ASMB or GILD?
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 9% net margin versus -8. 5% for Assembly Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GILD leads at 40. 1% versus -16. 8% for ASMB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASMB leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ASMB or GILD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASMB: 29.
3% to $40. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ASMB or GILD?
In this comparison, GILD (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. ASMB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ASMB or GILD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 2. 4% yield). Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GILD: +87. 8%, ASMB: -47. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ASMB and GILD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; GILD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GILD pays a dividend while ASMB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.