ATHS
Athene Holding Ltd. 7.250% Fixe
Asset Management
Market Cap$5.14B
5Y Perf.-1.1%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ATHS vs PRU vs MET vs GL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
Insurance - Life
Market Cap$35.06B
5Y Perf.-14.1%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
Insurance - Life
Market Cap$50.91B
5Y Perf.+5.4%
GL
Globe Life Inc.
Insurance - Life
Market Cap$11.85B
5Y Perf.+29.8%
ATHS vs PRU vs MET vs GL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ATHS | PRU | MET | GL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Life |
| Market Cap | $5.14B | $35.06B | $50.91B | $11.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.68B | $61.82B | $76.94B | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $308M | $3.48B | $3.62B | $1.16B |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.8% | 28.4% | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.2% | 6.3% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 1.8x | 7.5x | 7.9x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $22.96B | $20.18B | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.99B | $19.71B | $22.03B | $145M |
ATHS vs PRU vs MET vs GL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ATHS
PRU
MET
GL
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Athene Holding Ltd.… (ATHS) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| Prudential Financia… (PRU) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
| MetLife, Inc. (MET) | 100 | 105.4 | +5.4% |
| Globe Life Inc. (GL) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHS vs PRU vs MET vs GL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ATHS and GL are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Globe Life Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. PRU also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ATHS
Athene Holding Ltd. 7.250% Fixe
The Banking Pick
ATHS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.15 vs GL's 0.62
- 24.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRU's -14.0%
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 9.7x), PEG 0.15 vs 0.62
- Beta 0.18 vs MET's 1.07
Best for: valuation efficiency
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
The Insurance Pick
PRU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 5.5%
- 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs GL's 0.7%
Best for: income & stability
MET
MetLife, Inc.
The Insurance Play
MET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: financial services exposure
GL
Globe Life Inc.
The Insurance Pick
GL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 173.3% 10Y total return vs MET's 152.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 43.9%, current ratio 9.66x
- Beta 0.45, yield 0.7%, current ratio 9.66x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ATHS | 24.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRU's -14.0% |
| Value | ATHS | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 9.7x), PEG 0.15 vs 0.62 |
| Quality / Margins | GL | 19.4% margin vs MET's 4.7% |
| Stability / Safety | ATHS | Beta 0.18 vs MET's 1.07 |
| Dividends | PRU | 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs GL's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GL | +25.6% vs PRU's +2.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GL | 3.8% ROA vs ATHS's 0.1% |
ATHS vs PRU vs MET vs GL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
ATHS vs PRU vs MET vs GL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGLLAGGINGMET
Who Leads Where
GL leads in 3 of 6 categories
ATHS leads 1 • PRU leads 0 • MET leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓METMetLife, Inc.
0leads
PRUPrudential Financial,…
0leads
ATHSAthene Holding Ltd. 7…
1leads
GLGlobe Life Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ATHSvs PRUMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GL3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ATHS4/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GL7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GL4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MET is the larger business by revenue, generating $76.9B annually — 12.8x GL's $6.0B. GL is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MET's 4.7%.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | PRUPrudential Financ… | METMetLife, Inc. | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.7B | $61.8B | $76.9B | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.6B | $5.4B | $5.9B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $308M | $3.5B | $3.6B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $470M | $9.8B | $16.5B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +30.8% | +28.4% | +33.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +8.2% | +6.3% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +5.6% | +4.7% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +15.8% | +21.5% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +6.3% | +4.4% | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -12.8% | +35.9% | +9.3% |
GL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ATHS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.8x trailing earnings, ATHS trades at a 89% valuation discount to MET's 16.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ATHS offers better value at 0.15x vs GL's 0.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | PRUPrudential Financ… | METMetLife, Inc. | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $35.1B | $50.9B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$9.9B | $38.3B | $49.1B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.78x | 9.86x | 16.27x | 10.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.50x | 7.94x | 9.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.15x | — | — | 0.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.80x | 8.57x | 9.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.58x | 0.66x | 1.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.24x | 0.99x | 1.80x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 84.19x | 5.59x | 2.81x | 9.45x |
ATHS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GL delivers a 20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $0 for ATHS. GL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MET's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MET scores 8/9 vs ATHS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | PRUPrudential Financ… | METMetLife, Inc. | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | +10.3% | +12.7% | +20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.6% | +0.5% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +10.0% | +13.1% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.9% | +1.0% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.65x | 0.70x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15.0B | $3.2B | -$1.8B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15.0B | $19.7B | $22.0B | $145M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $23.0B | $20.2B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.76x | 5.51x | 11.27x |
GL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GL five years ago would be worth $14,715 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,407 for ATHS. Over the past 12 months, GL leads with a +25.6% total return vs PRU's +2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MET at 16.4% vs ATHS's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | PRUPrudential Financ… | METMetLife, Inc. | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -10.2% | -2.1% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +41.2% | +57.6% | +42.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +18.1% | +33.2% | +47.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +90.8% | +152.0% | +173.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.5% | +12.2% | +16.4% | +12.5% |
GL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHS and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHS is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MET's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GL currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs PRU's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | PRUPrudential Financ… | METMetLife, Inc. | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 0.97x | 1.07x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.17 | $119.76 | $83.64 | $156.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.60 | $91.89 | $67.33 | $116.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.3% | +84.2% | +93.4% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 55.4 | 59.2 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 2.3M | 3.4M | 451K |
Evenly matched — ATHS and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRU and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRU as "Hold", MET as "Buy", GL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for MET (target: $97) vs 2.4% for PRU (target: $103). For income investors, PRU offers the higher dividend yield at 5.46% vs GL's 0.70%.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | PRUPrudential Financ… | METMetLife, Inc. | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $103.25 | $97.33 | $171.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 | 33 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +5.5% | +2.9% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 13 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $5.50 | $2.27 | $1.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | +7.6% | +7.4% |
Evenly matched — PRU and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATHS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallGlobe Life Inc. (GL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ATHS vs PRU vs MET vs GL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHS or PRU or MET or GL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 0% for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) offers the better valuation at 1. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MetLife, Inc. (MET) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATHS or PRU or MET or GL?
On trailing P/E, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the cheapest at 1. 8x versus MetLife, Inc. at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Prudential Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATHS or PRU or MET or GL?
Over the past 5 years, Globe Life Inc.
(GL) delivered a total return of +47. 2%, compared to +14. 1% for Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe (ATHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GL returned +173. 3% versus ATHS's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATHS or PRU or MET or GL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus MetLife, Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning MET is approximately 509% more volatile than ATHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globe Life Inc. (GL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 70% for MetLife, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATHS or PRU or MET or GL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -14. 0% for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prudential Financial, Inc. grew EPS 36. 3% year-over-year, compared to -21. 7% for Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe. Over a 3-year CAGR, GL leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATHS or PRU or MET or GL?
Globe Life Inc.
(GL) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus 4. 4% for MetLife, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GL leads at 24. 4% versus 0. 0% for ATHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRU leads at 42. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATHS or PRU or MET or GL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Prudential Financial, Inc.
(PRU) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 7x for Globe Life Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MET: 24. 7% to $97. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATHS or PRU or MET or GL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 0. 7% for Globe Life Inc. (GL).
09Is ATHS or PRU or MET or GL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHS: +14. 1%, MET: +152. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATHS and PRU and MET and GL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATHS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MET is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ATHS: 24.1% · PRU: 6.3%)Net Margin>
%
(ATHS: 10.6% · PRU: 5.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ATHS: 1.8x · PRU: 9.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.