ATLO vs HFWA vs FBIZ vs SBCF vs FIS

For growth investors, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.

(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 58. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus Ames National Corporation's 13. 85x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.

(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +129. 7%, compared to -65. 1% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIZ returned +161. 1% versus FIS's -18. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ames National Corporation (ATLO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

64β versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 1. 18β — meaning SBCF is approximately 86% more volatile than ATLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 70% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ames National Corporation grew EPS 87. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATLO leads at 23. 6% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus Ames National Corporation's 13. 85x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Heritage Financial Corporation — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 54. 3% to $67. 14.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 1% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ames National Corporation (ATLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

64), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATLO: +48. 5%, SBCF: +122. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ATLO (Financial Services) and HFWA (Financial Services) and FBIZ (Financial Services) and SBCF (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ATLO is a small-cap deep-value stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.