ATPC vs NATR

For growth investors, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.

(NATR) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 6% for Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC). Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (21. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.

(NATR) delivered a total return of +18. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NATR returned +180. 2% versus ATPC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC) is the lower-risk stock at -2.

01β versus Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. 's 0. 62β — meaning NATR is approximately -131% more volatile than ATPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 19% for Agape ATP Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.

(NATR) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus -7. 6% for Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -21. 7% for Agape ATP Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATPC leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.

(NATR) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 1% net margin versus -186. 8% for Agape ATP Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NATR leads at 5. 2% versus -194. 5% for ATPC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NATR leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -2.

01)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATPC: -100. 0%, NATR: +180. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.